| Monday | Tuesday | Wednesday | Thursday | Friday | Saturday | Sunday |
| Welcome | Masterpoints! | Photos | Table Counts | ACBL Live Results |
Final Version — Included so far: Results, Masterpoints, Attendance, Brain Warmups, Daily Deal, and Tomorrow’s Schedule.
Alert: your browser may be showing you an old version of a page which is updated often. F5 (computer) or the ↻ button (phone or tablet) will get you the most recent version.
17½ tables at the end of Day One (Monday), 34.3% of the 2018 total.
In 2025, there were 83 tables to this point at the fall regional in Whistler.
In October 2023 here, there were 17 tables to this point.
In April 2022 here, there were 17 tables to this point.
That means this is the biggest Leavenworth start since the pandemic, by 2.9%!
For full details, check out the Table Counts page!
Bridge clubs and tournaments throughout the ACBL are struggling with returning to live play, so comparing this tournament’s attendance to one before the pandemic is not really fair. We'll hope to get around 60% of the 2018 attendance, making the target number 571 tables this time — but perhaps we will be pleasantly surprised!
A simple Rule Of Eleven one to get us started.
Partner leads the 5♦ against 3NT
Dummy:
♠ A Q 9 8 7
♥ A K
♦ 4
♣ K J 8 5 2
Your Hand:
♠ 6 4 3
♥ J T 6 4
♦T 8 7 6
♣Q 6
The Rule Of Eleven tells you that there are a total of six cards in declarer’s and your hand above the opening lead of the 5♦ ( 11 minus 5 is 6 ), assuming partner’s lead is fourth-best from a suit partner hopes to establish. Declarer has two cards higher than the 5♦, since you have four higher. What do you play after declarer calls for the four from dummy?
Answer below....
The five self-describing historical figures below were all born on April 13. Can you name them and place their birth years in chronological order? (Hint: the five people are in alphabetical order by surname.) Answers below.
(Some match awards from the KO will be replaced tomorrow by larger overall awards.)
Overall Leaders | ||
| 1 | Doug Sanders, Grandview WA | 3.41 |
| 1 | Jerri Honeyford, Mount Vernon WA | 3.41 |
| 3 | Brian Koblenz, Leavenworth WA | 2.24 |
| 3 | Charles Bennett, Spokane WA | 2.24 |
| 3 | John Adams, Cheney WA | 2.24 |
| 3 | Richard D'Litzenberger, Leavenworth WA | 2.24 |
| 7 | D Santilli, Sequim WA | 1.90 |
| 7 | K Eiden, Sequim WA | 1.90 |
| 9 | Sheila Bergren, Leavenworth WA | 1.43 |
| 9 | Steven Lachowicz, Wenatchee WA | 1.43 |
| 11 | Jacqui Erwert, Liberty Lake WA | 1.38 |
| 11 | Martha Burdick, Spokane WA | 1.38 |
Non-Life Master Leaders | ||
| 1 | Jerri Honeyford, Mount Vernon WA | 3.41 |
| 2 | Sheila Bergren, Leavenworth WA | 1.43 |
| 3 | John Carr, Victor ID | 0.88 |
| 3 | Nancy Mulroney, Hailey ID | 0.88 |
Masterpoints will be updated first on the masterpoints page. Leaders will appear here soon after in the preliminary version, before the game results are added. | ||
The half-table may have been a pain, but the last two Leavenworth Regionals, both post-pandemic, were 17 total tables on opening night, and the half-table got the 2026 total to 17½! Every little bit helps!
Single-session pairs event, scored in matchpoints. Part of the Evening Side Game Series, session 1 of 5 in the series. (In a side game series you are free to play as many sessions as you wish, even with different partners.) Strat limits (by pair average): A: 1500+ / B: 500 - 1500 / C: 0 - 500.
Average masterpoints for players in this event: 2659
| MPts | Score | A | B | C | Monday Evening Side Pairs | (7½ tables) ACBL Live Link |
| 3.41 | 62.50% | 1 | 1 | Jerri Honeyford, Mount Vernon WA; Doug Sanders, Grandview WA | ||
| 2.24 | 62.30% | 2/3 | Charles Bennett, Spokane WA; John Adams, Cheney WA | |||
| 2.24 | 62.30% | 2/3 | Brian Koblenz - Richard D'Litzenberger, Leavenworth WA | |||
| 1.90 | 55.90% | 4 | 2 | 1 | D Santilli - K Eiden, Sequim WA | |
| 1.08 | 55.16% | 5 | Connie Heller - Dennis Heller, Clinton WA | |||
| 1.38 | 54.37% | 3 | Jacqui Erwert, Liberty Lake WA; Martha Burdick, Spokane WA | |||
| 1.43 | 51.39% | 2 | Steven Lachowicz, Wenatchee WA; Sheila Bergren, Leavenworth WA | |||
| The Race For Overalls in Strat A (unlimited): 5 overall spots available. | |||||||||
| (Hover over a rank for more detail) Players Within Striking Distance (at some point) |
Rd. 1 Rank |
Rd. 2 Rank |
Rd. 3 Rank |
Rd. 4 Rank |
Rd. 5 Rank |
Rd. 6 Rank |
Rd. 7 Rank |
Final Rank |
|
| Jerri Honeyford, Mount Vernon WA; Doug Sanders, Grandview WA: | 8 Round # 1 score: 47.22% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat A: 8 Event score so far: 47.22% Currently 1.33 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
1 Round # 2 score: 100.00% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat A: 1 Event score so far: 73.61% Current Lead in Strat A: 0.08 boards. |
3 Round # 3 score: 55.56% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat A: 3 Event score so far: 67.59% Currently 0.25 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
3 Round # 4 score: 41.66% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat A: 3 Event score so far: 61.11% Currently 1.33 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
5 Round # 5 score: 33.33% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat A: 5 Event score so far: 55.55% Currently 2.33 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
4 Round # 6 score: 66.67% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat A: 4 Event score so far: 57.41% Currently 2.47 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
3 Round # 7 score: 77.78% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat A: 3 Event score so far: 60.32% Currently 1.04 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
1 Round # 8 score: 77.78% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat A: 1 Event score so far: 62.50% Current Lead in Strat A: 0.04 boards. |
|
| Charles Bennett, Spokane WA; John Adams, Cheney WA: | 3 Round # 1 score: 75.00% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat A: 3 Event score so far: 75.00% Currently 0.5 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
4 Round # 2 score: 47.22% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat A: 4 Event score so far: 61.11% Currently 0.75 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
5 Round # 3 score: 44.44% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat A: 5 Event score so far: 55.56% Currently 1.33 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
6 Round # 4 score: 000.00% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat A: 6 Event score so far: 55.56% Currently 1.5 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
4 Round # 5 score: 63.89% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat A: 4 Event score so far: 57.64% Currently 1.62 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
2 Round # 6 score: 86.11% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat A: 2 Event score so far: 63.33% Currently 1.17 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
2 Round # 7 score: 72.22% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat A: 2 Event score so far: 64.81% Currently 0.08 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
2 Round # 8 score: 47.22% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat A: 2 Event score so far: 62.30% Currently 0.04 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
|
| Brian Koblenz - Richard D'Litzenberger, Leavenworth WA: | 1 Round # 1 score: 91.67% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat A: 1 Event score so far: 91.67% Current Lead in Strat A: 0.5 boards. |
2 Round # 2 score: 52.78% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat A: 2 Event score so far: 72.22% Currently 0.08 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
2 Round # 3 score: 61.11% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat A: 2 Event score so far: 68.52% Currently 0.17 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
1 Round # 4 score: 83.33% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat A: 1 Event score so far: 72.22% Current Lead in Strat A: 0.75 boards. |
1 Round # 5 score: 66.67% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat A: 1 Event score so far: 71.11% Current Lead in Strat A: 0.75 boards. |
1 Round # 6 score: 000.00% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat A: 1 Event score so far: 71.11% Current Lead in Strat A: 1.17 boards. |
1 Round # 7 score: 36.11% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat A: 1 Event score so far: 65.28% Current Lead in Strat A: 0.08 boards. |
3 Round # 8 score: 44.44% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat A: 3 Event score so far: 62.30% Currently 0.04 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
|
| D Santilli - K Eiden, Sequim WA: | 7 Round # 1 score: 52.78% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat A: 7 Event score so far: 52.78% Currently 1.17 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
3 Round # 2 score: 80.56% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat A: 3 Event score so far: 66.67% Currently 0.42 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
4 Round # 3 score: 69.44% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat A: 4 Event score so far: 67.59% Currently 0.25 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
2 Round # 4 score: 61.11% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat A: 2 Event score so far: 65.97% Currently 0.75 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
2 Round # 5 score: 66.67% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat A: 2 Event score so far: 66.11% Currently 0.75 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
5 Round # 6 score: 13.89% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat A: 5 Event score so far: 57.41% Currently 2.47 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
4 Round # 7 score: 47.22% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat A: 4 Event score so far: 55.95% Currently 1.96 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
4 Round # 8 score: 55.56% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat A: 4 Event score so far: 55.90% Currently 1.58 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
|
| Connie Heller - Dennis Heller, Clinton WA: | 5 Round # 1 score: 58.33% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat A: 5 Event score so far: 58.33% Currently 1.0 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
11 Round # 2 score: 19.44% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat A: 11 Event score so far: 38.89% Currently 2.08 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
8 Round # 3 score: 72.22% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat A: 8 Event score so far: 50.00% Currently 1.83 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
5 Round # 4 score: 75.00% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat A: 5 Event score so far: 56.25% Currently 1.92 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
3 Round # 5 score: 69.44% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat A: 3 Event score so far: 58.89% Currently 1.83 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
3 Round # 6 score: 69.45% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat A: 3 Event score so far: 60.65% Currently 1.88 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
5 Round # 7 score: 22.22% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat A: 5 Event score so far: 55.16% Currently 2.13 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
5 Round # 8 score: 000.00% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat A: 5 Event score so far: 55.16% Currently 1.54 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
|
| Jacqui Erwert, Liberty Lake WA; Martha Burdick, Spokane WA: | 6 Round # 1 score: 52.78% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat A: 6 Event score so far: 52.78% Currently 1.17 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
8 Round # 2 score: 000.00% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat A: 8 Event score so far: 52.78% Currently 0.62 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
6 Round # 3 score: 52.78% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat A: 6 Event score so far: 52.78% Currently 1.06 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
8 Round # 4 score: 38.89% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat A: 8 Event score so far: 48.15% Currently 2.17 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
7 Round # 5 score: 61.11% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat A: 7 Event score so far: 51.39% Currently 2.37 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
6 Round # 6 score: 72.22% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat A: 6 Event score so far: 55.56% Currently 2.33 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
6 Round # 7 score: 52.78% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat A: 6 Event score so far: 55.09% Currently 1.83 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
6 Round # 8 score: 50.00% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat A: 6 Event score so far: 54.37% Currently 1.71 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
|
| Steven Lachowicz, Wenatchee WA; Sheila Bergren, Leavenworth WA: | 4 Round # 1 score: 66.67% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat A: 4 Event score so far: 66.67% Currently 0.75 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
5 Round # 2 score: 52.78% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat A: 5 Event score so far: 59.72% Currently 0.83 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
1 Round # 3 score: 91.67% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat A: 1 Event score so far: 70.37% Current Lead in Strat A: 0.17 boards. |
4 Round # 4 score: 16.67% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat A: 4 Event score so far: 56.95% Currently 1.83 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
6 Round # 5 score: 36.11% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat A: 6 Event score so far: 52.78% Currently 2.75 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
8 Round # 6 score: 30.55% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat A: 8 Event score so far: 49.07% Currently 3.97 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
7 Round # 7 score: 66.67% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat A: 7 Event score so far: 51.59% Currently 2.87 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
7 Round # 8 score: 50.00% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat A: 7 Event score so far: 51.39% Currently 2.67 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
|
| Nancy Mulroney, Hailey ID; John Carr, Victor ID: | 9 Round # 1 score: 47.22% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat A: 9 Event score so far: 47.22% Currently 1.33 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
9 Round # 2 score: 44.44% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat A: 9 Event score so far: 45.83% Currently 1.67 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
10 Round # 3 score: 38.89% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat A: 10 Event score so far: 43.52% Currently 2.42 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
11 Round # 4 score: 41.67% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat A: 11 Event score so far: 43.06% Currently 3.5 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
9 Round # 5 score: 63.89% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat A: 9 Event score so far: 47.22% Currently 3.58 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
10 Round # 6 score: 33.33% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat A: 10 Event score so far: 44.91% Currently 4.72 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
10 Round # 7 score: 000.00% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat A: 10 Event score so far: 44.91% Currently 3.67 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
8 Round # 8 score: 77.78% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat A: 8 Event score so far: 49.60% Currently 2.71 boards behind the Strat A leader. |
|
| The Race For Overalls in Strat B (under 1500): 3 overall spots available. | |||||||||
| (Hover over a rank for more detail) Players Within Striking Distance (at some point) |
Rd. 1 Rank |
Rd. 2 Rank |
Rd. 3 Rank |
Rd. 4 Rank |
Rd. 5 Rank |
Rd. 6 Rank |
Rd. 7 Rank |
Final Rank |
|
| Jerri Honeyford, Mount Vernon WA; Doug Sanders, Grandview WA: | 4 Round # 1 score: 47.22% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat B: 4 Event score so far: 47.22% Currently 0.58 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
1 Round # 2 score: 100.00% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat B: 1 Event score so far: 73.61% Current Lead in Strat B: 0.42 boards. |
2 Round # 3 score: 55.56% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat B: 2 Event score so far: 67.59% Currently 0.25 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
2 Round # 4 score: 41.66% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat B: 2 Event score so far: 61.11% Currently 0.58 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
2 Round # 5 score: 33.33% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat B: 2 Event score so far: 55.55% Currently 1.58 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
1 Round # 6 score: 66.67% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat B: 1 Event score so far: 57.41% Current Lead in Strat B: -0.0 boards. |
1 Round # 7 score: 77.78% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat B: 1 Event score so far: 60.32% Current Lead in Strat B: 0.92 boards. |
1 Round # 8 score: 77.78% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat B: 1 Event score so far: 62.50% Current Lead in Strat B: 1.58 boards. |
|
| D Santilli - K Eiden, Sequim WA: | 3 Round # 1 score: 52.78% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat B: 3 Event score so far: 52.78% Currently 0.42 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
2 Round # 2 score: 80.56% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat B: 2 Event score so far: 66.67% Currently 0.42 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
3 Round # 3 score: 69.44% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat B: 3 Event score so far: 67.59% Currently 0.25 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
1 Round # 4 score: 61.11% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat B: 1 Event score so far: 65.97% Current Lead in Strat B: 0.58 boards. |
1 Round # 5 score: 66.67% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat B: 1 Event score so far: 66.11% Current Lead in Strat B: 1.58 boards. |
2 Round # 6 score: 13.89% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat B: 2 Event score so far: 57.41% Current Lead in Strat B: 0.0 boards. |
2 Round # 7 score: 47.22% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat B: 2 Event score so far: 55.95% Currently 0.92 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
2 Round # 8 score: 55.56% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat B: 2 Event score so far: 55.90% Currently 1.58 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
|
| Jacqui Erwert, Liberty Lake WA; Martha Burdick, Spokane WA: | 2 Round # 1 score: 52.78% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat B: 2 Event score so far: 52.78% Currently 0.42 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
4 Round # 2 score: 000.00% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat B: 4 Event score so far: 52.78% Currently 0.62 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
4 Round # 3 score: 52.78% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat B: 4 Event score so far: 52.78% Currently 1.06 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
4 Round # 4 score: 38.89% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat B: 4 Event score so far: 48.15% Currently 1.6 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
4 Round # 5 score: 61.11% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat B: 4 Event score so far: 51.39% Currently 1.77 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
3 Round # 6 score: 72.22% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat B: 3 Event score so far: 55.56% Currently 0.28 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
3 Round # 7 score: 52.78% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat B: 3 Event score so far: 55.09% Currently 0.94 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
3 Round # 8 score: 50.00% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat B: 3 Event score so far: 54.37% Currently 1.71 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
|
| Steven Lachowicz, Wenatchee WA; Sheila Bergren, Leavenworth WA: | 1 Round # 1 score: 66.67% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat B: 1 Event score so far: 66.67% Current Lead in Strat B: 0.42 boards. |
3 Round # 2 score: 52.78% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat B: 3 Event score so far: 59.72% Currently 0.83 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
1 Round # 3 score: 91.67% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat B: 1 Event score so far: 70.37% Current Lead in Strat B: 0.25 boards. |
3 Round # 4 score: 16.67% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat B: 3 Event score so far: 56.95% Currently 1.08 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
3 Round # 5 score: 36.11% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat B: 3 Event score so far: 52.78% Currently 2.0 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
4 Round # 6 score: 30.55% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat B: 4 Event score so far: 49.07% Currently 1.5 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
4 Round # 7 score: 66.67% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat B: 4 Event score so far: 51.59% Currently 1.83 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
4 Round # 8 score: 50.00% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat B: 4 Event score so far: 51.39% Currently 2.67 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
|
| Nancy Mulroney, Hailey ID; John Carr, Victor ID: | 5 Round # 1 score: 47.22% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat B: 5 Event score so far: 47.22% Currently 0.58 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
5 Round # 2 score: 44.44% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat B: 5 Event score so far: 45.83% Currently 1.67 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
6 Round # 3 score: 38.89% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat B: 6 Event score so far: 43.52% Currently 2.42 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
5 Round # 4 score: 41.67% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat B: 5 Event score so far: 43.06% Currently 2.75 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
5 Round # 5 score: 63.89% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat B: 5 Event score so far: 47.22% Currently 2.83 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
5 Round # 6 score: 33.33% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat B: 5 Event score so far: 44.91% Currently 2.25 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
5 Round # 7 score: 000.00% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat B: 5 Event score so far: 44.91% Currently 2.77 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
5 Round # 8 score: 77.78% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat B: 5 Event score so far: 49.60% Currently 2.71 boards behind the Strat B leader. |
|
| The Race For Overalls in Strat C (under 500): 2 overall spots available. | |||||||||
| (Hover over a rank for more detail) Players Within Striking Distance (at some point) |
Rd. 1 Rank |
Rd. 2 Rank |
Rd. 3 Rank |
Rd. 4 Rank |
Rd. 5 Rank |
Rd. 6 Rank |
Rd. 7 Rank |
Final Rank |
|
| D Santilli - K Eiden, Sequim WA: | 2 Round # 1 score: 52.78% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat C: 2 Event score so far: 52.78% Currently 0.42 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
1 Round # 2 score: 80.56% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat C: 1 Event score so far: 66.67% Current Lead in Strat C: 0.42 boards. |
2 Round # 3 score: 69.44% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat C: 2 Event score so far: 67.59% Currently 0.25 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
1 Round # 4 score: 61.11% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat C: 1 Event score so far: 65.97% Current Lead in Strat C: 1.08 boards. |
1 Round # 5 score: 66.67% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat C: 1 Event score so far: 66.11% Current Lead in Strat C: 2.0 boards. |
1 Round # 6 score: 13.89% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat C: 1 Event score so far: 57.41% Current Lead in Strat C: 1.5 boards. |
1 Round # 7 score: 47.22% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat C: 1 Event score so far: 55.95% Current Lead in Strat C: 0.92 boards. |
1 Round # 8 score: 55.56% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat C: 1 Event score so far: 55.90% Current Lead in Strat C: 1.08 boards. |
|
| Steven Lachowicz, Wenatchee WA; Sheila Bergren, Leavenworth WA: | 1 Round # 1 score: 66.67% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat C: 1 Event score so far: 66.67% Current Lead in Strat C: 0.42 boards. |
2 Round # 2 score: 52.78% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat C: 2 Event score so far: 59.72% Currently 0.42 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
1 Round # 3 score: 91.67% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat C: 1 Event score so far: 70.37% Current Lead in Strat C: 0.25 boards. |
2 Round # 4 score: 16.67% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat C: 2 Event score so far: 56.95% Currently 1.08 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
2 Round # 5 score: 36.11% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat C: 2 Event score so far: 52.78% Currently 2.0 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
2 Round # 6 score: 30.55% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat C: 2 Event score so far: 49.07% Currently 1.5 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
2 Round # 7 score: 66.67% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat C: 2 Event score so far: 51.59% Currently 0.92 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
2 Round # 8 score: 50.00% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat C: 2 Event score so far: 51.39% Currently 1.08 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
|
| Nancy Mulroney, Hailey ID; John Carr, Victor ID: | 3 Round # 1 score: 47.22% After Round # 1: Rank in Strat C: 3 Event score so far: 47.22% Currently 0.58 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
3 Round # 2 score: 44.44% After Round # 2: Rank in Strat C: 3 Event score so far: 45.83% Currently 1.25 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
4 Round # 3 score: 38.89% After Round # 3: Rank in Strat C: 4 Event score so far: 43.52% Currently 2.42 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
3 Round # 4 score: 41.67% After Round # 4: Rank in Strat C: 3 Event score so far: 43.06% Currently 2.75 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
3 Round # 5 score: 63.89% After Round # 5: Rank in Strat C: 3 Event score so far: 47.22% Currently 2.83 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
3 Round # 6 score: 33.33% After Round # 6: Rank in Strat C: 3 Event score so far: 44.91% Currently 2.25 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
3 Round # 7 score: 000.00% After Round # 7: Rank in Strat C: 3 Event score so far: 44.91% Currently 1.99 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
3 Round # 8 score: 77.78% After Round # 8: Rank in Strat C: 3 Event score so far: 49.60% Currently 1.32 boards behind the Strat C leader. |
|
Monday-Tuesday Knockout Teams, Bracket OneBracket One has five teams and a masterpoint average of 5879 per player. ACBL Live link to brackets |
|||
| Qualifying Swiss Monday Evening 0.31 red per match win |
Semifinals Tuesday Afternoon 10.15 gold |
Final Tuesday Evening 14.50 gold |
|
|
Q — 1. Carmichael (4 wins, 74 VP) Q — 2. Miller (3 wins, 58 VP) Q — 3. Richardson (2 wins, 33 VP) Q — 4. Lipe (0 wins, 18 VP)
5. Holman (1 win, 17VP) |
Carmichael vs Lipe Miller vs Richardson |
??? vs ??? |
|
|
Hideous Hog (In Training)'s Prediction: Carmichael over Miller in the final. |
|||
Bracket One Semifinalist Team Rosters:Tom Carmichael, Marysville WA; Cristina Jacob - Dan Jacob, Vancouver BC; Mitch Dunitz, Sherman Oaks CA; Rick Roeder, La Mesa CA Ray Miller, Seattle WA; Paul Martin, Duvall WA; Patrick Dunn - Polly Dunn, Edmonds WA |
|||
Monday-Tuesday Knockout Teams, Bracket TwoBracket Two has five teams and a masterpoint average of 1326 per player. ACBL Live link to brackets |
|||
| Qualifying Swiss Monday Evening 0.27 red per match win |
Semifinals Tuesday Afternoon 4.40 gold |
Final Tuesday Evening 6.28 gold |
|
|
Q — 1. Ostertag (3 wins, 50 VP) Q — 2. Samuels (2 wins, 44 VP) Q — 3. Rigazio (2 wins, 40 VP) Q — 4. Lycette (2 wins, 38 VP)
5. Ball (1 win, 28VP) |
Ostertag vs Lycette Samuels vs Rigazio |
??? vs ??? |
|
|
Hideous Hog (In Training)'s Prediction: Ostertag over Rigazio in the final. |
|||
Bracket Two Semifinalist Team Rosters:Carl Ostertag - Mardi Dennis - Steve McCoy, Oak Harbor WA; Mary Carlson, Marysville WA Jennifer Samuels - Satish Viswanatham - Mark Mackenzie, Portland OR; Sheryl Williams, West Linn OR |
|||
|
For those of you who used to like the puzzles I printed in the old bulletins, here is a link to an online version: one of the puzzles that I used to feature in the old paper Bulletins, but it is easy to play on a computer as well. Not so easy on a tablet or phone, since most of the puzzles require right-clicks, not easily done in a tablet or phone environment.
Bridges gives you a grid of islands, circles containing a number. Your objective is connect the islands with bridges so that 1) all bridges are horizontal or vertical only, no diagonal or curved bridges, 2) The numbers in the circles indicate the number of bridges that go to that island, 3) Two islands may be connected with one or two bridges, but no more, 4) Bridges may not cross one another or go over an island, and 5) All of the islands need to be connected together with the network of bridges. Strategy: bigger numbers usually allow you to connect one bridge in each possible direction and later decide which directions have second bridges as well; check how many islands can actually be connected with up-down or left-right lines, often this will give you clues as to where the bridges must be. Click on the puzzle you want to try at the right (or the caption below) to go to the page with all the instructions you’ll need. These puzzles come from Simon Tatham’s Portable Puzzle Collection (see below) and there are links there to apps for most devices.
|
![]() Easy puzzle (McBruce’s time: 0min 56sec) |
![]() Medium puzzle (McBruce’s time: 0min 44sec) |
|
![]() Tricky puzzle (McBruce’s time: 1min 13sec) |
Tuesday Morning Side Game: Pairs game, part of the Morning Side Game Series (1st of 5).
Strat Limits (by pair average) A: 3000+, B: 1500 - 3000, C: 0 - 500.
Masterpoints: Mostly red points but gold points for overall winners if they play another session in the Morning Side Game Series, and a chance for gold points for individuals whose two best games in the series (played with the same or different partners) are good enough to make the series overalls.
Leavenworth 2023 winners (6 tables):
A: Jennifer Beall - Ron Beall, Bellingham WA
B: Dean Altschuler - Valerie McWhorter, Bellingham WA
C: Sheila Van De Velde - Frances Kammermayer, Vancouver BC
Whistler 2025 winners (11, 12 tables):
A, B: Benjamin Levine - Nicholas Buck, Prince George BC
C: Jerry Shapiro - Sharene Jansen, Vancouver BC
Monday-Tuesday Willkommen Knockout Teams (began Monday evening): Team game, 4-6 players on a team, matches scored in IMPs. This knockout will be played in the traditional style, but over only three sessions, with brackets of 5-8 teams.
Bracketed, by team average into brackets of 5-8 teams.
Masterpoints: Gold points for teams that make it to the finals or win a third-place match, red points for other match awards. Lower brackets may have part-gold, part-red for overalls, based on masterpoints.
Leavenworth 2023 winners (8 teams in one 3-session handicapped bracket):
Bracket I: Scott Chupack - Ray Miller, Seattle WA; Polly Dunn - Patrick Dunn, Edmonds WA
Whistler 2025 winners (24 teams in three 4-session brackets):
Bracket I: Nicholas Stock, North Vancouver BC; Paul Martin, Duvall WA; Ray Miller, Seattle WA; Gustav Axen, New Westminster BC
Bracket II: Debbie Martignago, Port Coquitlam BC; Marlene Sumi, Burnaby BC; Khosrow Shad - Mojgan Shad, West Vancouver BC
Bracket III: Lana Chow - Joyce Tokarek, Vancouver BC; Lisa Walsh - Daniel Walsh, Tinton Falls NJ
Tuesday Open Pairs: Two session pairs game, matchpoint scoring.
Strat Limits (by pair average) A: 3000+, B: 1500 - 3000, C: 0 - 1500.
Masterpoints: Gold points for overalls and some section tops, other awards are red points. Note that you can win points in the first session that are replaced by a higher overall award after the second: you get the greater of your overall award or the sum of the session awards; not both combined.
Leavenworth 2023 winners (8, 8 tables):
A, B: Richard D'Litzenberger - Brian Koblenz, Leavenworth WA
C: Martha Burdick - Jacqui Erwert, Liberty Lake WA
Whistler 2025 winners (11, 12 tables):
A: Cameron Doner, Surrey BC; Donald Sache, West Vancouver BC
B, C: Dex Stuberg, Seattle WA; Cliff Marx, Everett WA
Tuesday Gold Rush 0-750 Pairs: Two session pairs game, matchpoint scoring.
Strat Limits (by pair average) 7: 500 - 750, 5: 300 - 500, 3: 0 - 300. No individuals over 750 points may play in this event, even if the pair average is below 750.
Masterpoints: Gold points for top strat overalls and some section tops, other awards are red points. Note that you can win points in the first session that are replaced by a higher overall award after the second: you get the greater of your overall award or the sum of the session awards; not both combined.
Leavenworth 2023 winners (10, 10 tables):
7: Steve Kasner - Marianne Kersten, Bellevue WA
5, 3: Moira Mallison, Portland OR; Katy Balagopal, Washougal WA
Whistler 2025 winners (17, 13 tables):
7, 4, 2: Keith Stevenson, Vancouver BC; Jane Lutman, North Vancouver BC
Tuesday Afternoon Side Game: Pairs game, part of the Afternoon Side Game Series (2nd of 5).
Strat Limits (by pair average) A: 1500+, B: 500 - 1500, C: 0 - 500.
Masterpoints: Mostly red points but gold points for overall winners if they play another session in the Afternoon Side Game Series, and a chance for gold points for individuals whose two best games in the series (played with the same or different partners) are good enough to make the series overalls.
Leavenworth 2023 winners (7 tables):
A: Dennis Heller - Connie Heller, Clinton WA
B, C: William Tenneson - Steven Lachowicz, Wenatchee WA
Whistler 2025 winners (5 tables):
A, B: William Tenneson, Wenatchee WA; Arthur Resnick, Seattle WA
Tuesday Evening Side Game: Pairs game, part of the Evening Side Game Series (2nd of 5).
Strat Limits (by pair average) A: 1500+, B: 500 - 1500, C: 0 - 500.
Masterpoints: Mostly red points but gold points for overall winners if they play another session in the Evening Side Game Series, and a chance for gold points for individuals whose two best games in the series (played with the same or different partners) are good enough to make the series overalls.
Leavenworth 2023 winners (5 tables):
A, B: Jeff Jacob, Vancouver WA; Ann Romeo, Seattle WA
C: Karen Rise, Leavenworth WA; Carol Knaup, Seattle WA
Tuesday Bracketed Round Robin Teams: Team game, 4-6 players on a team, short matches scored in IMPs and converted to victory points.
Bracketed, by team average into brackets of usually 7-9 teams; each team will play all, or nearly all, of the other teams in their bracket.
Masterpoints: Gold points for overalls, or red points for match awards. Lower brackets may have part-gold, part-red for overalls, based on masterpoints.
Whistler 2025 winners (26 teams in 3 brackets):
Bracket I: William Bailey, Mill Valley CA; Daniel Korbel, Las Vegas NV; Cindy Oishi, West Vancouver BC; Jacob Morgan, Madison WI
Bracket II: Jill Plasteras - Mel Zimmerman - Andrea Killackey, Victoria BC; Madeleine Tremblay, North Saanich BC
Bracket III: JP Weber - Joanna Heard - Holly Boudreau - Margaret Skinner, Victoria BC
Review the question here
| Board # 8 |
North |
EW Vulnerable |
West opened 1♠, East responded 1NT, West raised to 3NT. South led the 5♦ and the North player had to decide whether to play the ten or a low diamond. The Rule of Eleven tells North that there are exactly six cards higher than the led 5♦ in the North and East hands. North has four of them, so declarer has two. Playing low may cost if declarer has the 9♦, but is this likely? If declarer has the 9♦ and a higher honour, partner would lead a different card: from AQJ5 partner would lead the queen, from AKJ5 or AKQ5 partner would lead the king. Declarer cannot have the 9♦, so play low! Declarer wins the queen and at some point finesses the jack of clubs, so you’re in with the Q♣. If you played the T♦ at trick one, declarer ducks your diamond return, partner, having led the five, must win, and declarer has a diamond stopper. If you realized partner must have the nine and saved the ten, three diamond tricks are yours and partner’s A♣ will set 3NT! |
|||||
| ♠ | 6 4 3 | |||||||
| ♥ | J T 6 4 | |||||||
| ♦ | T 8 7 6 | |||||||
| West | ♣ | Q 6 | East | |||||
| ♠ | A Q 9 8 7 | ♠ | K 2 | |||||
| ♥ | A K | ♥ | Q 7 5 2 | |||||
| ♦ | 4 | ♦ | K Q 3 2 | |||||
| ♣ | K J 8 5 2 | South | ♣ | T 7 4 | ||||
| ♠ | J T 5 | |||||||
| ♥ | 9 8 3 | |||||||
| ♦ | A J 9 5 | |||||||
| ♣ | A 9 3 | |||||||
The German sub-headline at the top of the page, Willkommen in der Bayerisch Aussehenden Stadt des Bundesstaates Washington! translates to Welcome to Washington State's most Bavarian-looking city! Back to top.
| Monday | Tuesday | Wednesday | Thursday | Friday | Saturday | Sunday |
| Welcome | Masterpoints! | Photos | Table Counts | ACBL Live Results |