VanLawn Bridge After Dark — Monday Evening, October 19 – Section X

Thanks to all for playing!

Tabs below reveal board results or section standings or general help. Click some and see!
Use CTRL + (minus) to shrink to fit on your computer screen, or CTRL + (plus) to expand, or CTRL + 'zero' to go back to the default.

Results for Section X, North-South
Pair#PercentScoreXYMPtsPlayers
X6N 69.52% 58.40110.48(X)Amanda Hill - David Hsu
X3N 55.48% 46.60220.34(X)Alexa Allen - Jacquie Brown
X8N 52.26% 43.9030.24(X)Francesco L Piccone - M Piccone
X5N 51.67% 43.40Diane O Connor - Valerie Young
X7N 47.50% 39.90Scott Turner - John Fraser
X4N 45.83% 38.50Eiler Eis - Bob Hodgkinson
X1N 45.83% 38.50Vicki Torbett - Myrna Halpenny
X2N 31.19% 26.20Faye Wightman - Diane Hardouin
North-South had 52.50% of the highcard points in this session's deals.
The average freakness rating of this session's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the deal set as a whole) was 13.19, a bit above the average of about 11.93.
Results for Section X, East-West
Pair#PercentScoreXYMPtsPlayers
X4E 61.31% 51.50110.48(X)Carol Linda Ward - David Rosenberg
X7E 60.12% 50.5020.34(X)Doug MacDougall - Niamh Kelly
X8E 51.90% 43.6030.24(X)Curtis Ballard - Elizabeth Ballard
X3E 48.69% 40.9020.17(Y)Doug Stewart - Louise Forsyth
X6E 47.74% 40.10Patti Young - Judy Day
X5E 45.95% 38.60Lee Laxton - Donna Bridgeman
X2E 42.98% 36.10Wendy Chapman - Linda Collins
X1E 42.02% 35.30Johanne Leach - Lynne Pomfret
North-South had 52.50% of the highcard points in this session's deals.
The average freakness rating of this session's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the deal set as a whole) was 13.19, a bit above the average of about 11.93.
Board 1 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N92 5.504003NTn=6♦︎— 0.508X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N92 5.504003NTn=6♦︎— 0.508X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N67 4.001501NTn+26♦︎— 2.0033X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N50 3.001303♦︎n+18♣︎— 3.0050X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N33 2.00503♣︎w–1A♥︎— 4.0067X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N17 1.00—3NTn–16♦︎50 5.0083X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N0 0.00—2♣︎w=A♥︎90 6.00100X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ne*4♦︎-3 500
3Nn8♠︎+1 430
3Ne4♦︎-3 150
3♦︎n5♥︎+1 130
3♦︎n3♣︎= 110
3♣︎wA♥︎-2 100
2♠︎eA♦︎-1 50
4♦︎n3♣︎-1 50
North opens 1♦︎, East passes, and South scrapes up a raise to 2♦︎. West makes a takeout double and North has to rethink. North was hoping to be able to jump to 2NT as a rebid, showing 18-19 balanced, but some new strategy is now needed. A 3♦︎ rebid will probably be safe, but if South has as little as 8 points 3NT may easily make. A confident player might bid 3NT, hoping to be able to make it even opposite a minimum by playing West for most of the missing non-diamond high cards based on the bidding. A 2NT rebid will probably get a 3♦︎ call from South. Redouble might be best though, suggesting a penalty double of wherever East-West end up. But even this might not work, since a timid South will run to 3♦︎. 3NT is difficult with the 4-0 diamond break, but nine tricks are possible. Difficult deal, bidding and play!
#1 D  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ KJ32Dealer: North
♥︎ AK2 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ K753N  EAST      
♠︎ A754♣︎ A9♠︎ Q98
♥︎ QJ86   ♥︎ 543
♦︎N SOUTH       ♦︎QT86
♣︎KJ872♠︎T6♣︎QT3
 18 ♥︎T97 1 
11HCP6♦︎AJ9426FRK0
 5 ♣︎654 2 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
977105by
E
46527
by
S
977106by
W
46537
Board 2 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N92 5.50503NTe–18♥︎— 0.508X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N92 5.50504♠︎w–19♥︎— 0.508X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N58 3.50—3♠︎w+14♥︎170 2.5042X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N58 3.50—3♠︎w+13♥︎170 2.5042X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N33 2.00—4♠︎w=6♥︎420 4.0067X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N8 0.50—4♠︎e+1A♥︎450 5.5092X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N8 0.50—4♠︎e+1A♥︎450 5.5092X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ne8♥︎-1 50
2♠︎eA♥︎+3 200
4♠︎eA♥︎= 420
4♠︎eA♥︎= 420
4♠︎eK♥︎= 420
3NeA♥︎+1 430
4♠︎eA♥︎+1 450
4♠︎eA♥︎+1 450
East opens 1♣︎ and South overcalls 1♥︎. West bids 1♠︎, promising a five-card suit since a negative double is an alternate possibility. North passes and East has enough to bid 4♠︎ directly, since few 1♠︎ responses in competition will be made with a 5-7 point hand. Most will choose 3♠︎ instead and let partner decide, but 4♠︎ should be the contract at all tables. (A 2♠︎ rebid by East shows a fit but no extras and West will pass and be surprised to find so much in dummy.) With only 14 points in the opponents' hands, South, who overcalled, is the heavy favorite to hold the Q♠︎, so South should bring the trumps in without loss and lose only one heart and two clubs. Two pairs in 3NT without a heart stopper and two who managed an overtrick somehow are quite baffling results!
#2 V  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ 853Dealer: South
♥︎ 96543 North-South Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ 532N  EAST      
♠︎ AT976♣︎ J9♠︎ KJ2
♥︎ T   ♥︎ Q2
♦︎KQ98V SOUTH       ♦︎AJ4
♣︎762♠︎Q4♣︎AQ853
 1 ♥︎AKJ87 2 
9HCP17♦︎T764FRK2
 13 ♣︎KT4 2 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
22723by
E
81061010
by
S
22723by
W
81061010
Board 3 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N92 5.502002♠︎w–2A♥︎— 0.508X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N92 5.502003NTe–28♣︎— 0.508X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N67 4.001001♥︎e–18♣︎— 2.0033X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N42 2.50—1♦︎e+18♣︎90 3.5058X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N42 2.50—1♦︎e+15♠︎90 3.5058X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N17 1.00—2♠︎w=Q♣︎110 5.0083X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N0 0.00—1♦︎e+37♠︎130 6.00100X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nw2♥︎-1 100
3Ne8♣︎-1 100
2♥︎s8♦︎-1 50
3♦︎e7♠︎= 110
2♠︎w7♦︎= 110
2♦︎e3♥︎+1 110
2♥︎e7♠︎= 110
1♦︎e5♠︎+3 130
Many players are so afraid of the possibility of a three-card 1♣︎ or 1♦︎ opener that they overstrive to avoid having the auction end with the opening bid. Here, after three passes, East opens 1♦︎ and South passes a second time. Most players will bid 1♠︎ with the West hand, five points, one of them a singleton jack, and a bid suit weaker than a wet noodle. North passes and East rebids 2♥︎, a rebid showing more (not equal) diamonds than hearts and a hand strong enough to still be opened if an ace were a deuce. It's amazing how often opener jump rebids when you scrape up a response on junk. Notice especially that the top score East-West in Section A was the one West player who passed 1♦︎. Don't be afraid to leave your partner in 1♣︎ or 1♦︎. Bidding with junk seldom saves anything.
#3 N  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ QJ43Dealer: East
♥︎ A532 East-West Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ 974V  EAST      
♠︎ T962♣︎ Q6♠︎ AK8
♥︎ J   ♥︎ QT98
♦︎85N SOUTH       ♦︎AQJT6
♣︎AT5432♠︎75♣︎7
 9 ♥︎K764 1 
5HCP16♦︎K326FRK4
 10 ♣︎KJ98 1 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
54635by
E
79798
by
S
54635by
W
89798
Board 4 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N100 6.001502NTn+1A♦︎— 0.000X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N83 5.001201NTn+15♣︎— 1.0017X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N58 3.501102♥︎n=Q♣︎— 2.5042X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N58 3.501102♥︎n=J♣︎— 2.5042X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N33 2.00901♣︎n+1T♠︎— 4.0067X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N17 1.00—2NTn–15♣︎100 5.0083X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N0 0.00—3NTn–25♣︎200 6.00100X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♥︎n2♠︎+2 170
2♥︎n5♣︎+1 140
2♥︎nT♠︎+1 140
2♥︎nT♠︎= 110
3Nn6♠︎-1 100
3♥︎s7♠︎-1 100
3NnT♠︎-2 200
3NnT♠︎-3 300
West passes and North opens 1NT. East passes and South transfers to hearts with a 2♦︎ call. West passes and North completes the transfer, bidding 2♥︎. East passes and so does South. Wiseguy West realizes that South may have nothing, which would leave partner with 14 or more points, and tries 2♠︎. North should really double 2♠︎, but is also mesmerized by the possibility of South having nothing, so passes. East passes and South rebids 3♦︎, showing a weak two-suiter. North is happy to pass this, and 3♦︎ is a lot easier than 3♥︎, but most will make nine tricks in hearts, so 3♦︎ beats only those crazies in 3NT and one who failed to make 3♥︎ somehow. The reality is that transfer-drops can be as strong as 6 or 7 points, although zero is a possibility!
#4 V  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ AKQ5Dealer: West
♥︎ KT Both Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ T87V  EAST      
♠︎ 98743♣︎ K986♠︎ T62
♥︎ A64   ♥︎ J83
♦︎J2V SOUTH       ♦︎AQ9
♣︎A32♠︎J♣︎QJ75
 15 ♥︎Q9752 1 
9HCP10♦︎K65432FRK0
 6 ♣︎T4 6 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
77997by
E
56435
by
S
77997by
W
56435
Board 5 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N100 6.001003NTe–25♣︎— 0.000X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N58 3.50502NTe–14♣︎— 2.5042X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N58 3.50503♦︎e–1T♥︎— 2.5042X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N58 3.50503♥︎w–1K♣︎— 2.5042X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N58 3.50502♠︎w–19♣︎— 2.5042X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N17 1.00—1♦︎e=J♥︎70 5.0083X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N0 0.00—2♥︎w+1K♣︎140 6.00100X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎wK♣︎-2 100
4♥︎wK♣︎-2 100
4♥︎wK♣︎-1 50
2♥︎w9♣︎= 110
2♥︎wK♣︎= 110
2♥︎w6♠︎= 110
2♥︎wK♣︎= 110
3♥︎eJ♦︎= 140
North passes and East opens 1♦︎. South passes and West responds 1♥︎. North passes and East re-evaluates: how strong is the East hand in support of hearts, where there is a known eight-card fit? 14 high-card points, one for the doubleton club, and another for the trump honour. This bumps the East hand up to the next bracket, worth an invitational jump rebid of 3♥︎. Most West players will accept and go down one or two: nine points, partner, it seemed right to bid the game. The computer actually deals out the other 39 cards thousands of times, looking for deals that fit the bidding thus far, and tracks how many tricks are available in each fitting deal, and discovers that 4♥︎ is likely to fail, and even 3♥︎ is not a sure bet. Tough for human players to stop in 3♥︎; most not in 4♥︎ will blame East for rebidding only 2♥︎.
#5 D  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ 632Dealer: North
♥︎ Q84 North-South Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ 854N  EAST      
♠︎ KJ74♣︎ KQT9♠︎ QT8
♥︎ A953   ♥︎ K762
♦︎972V SOUTH       ♦︎KQ63
♣︎J3♠︎A95♣︎A2
 7 ♥︎JT 0 
9HCP14♦︎AJT1FRK1
 10 ♣︎87654 2 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
65457by
E
78886
by
S
65457by
W
78886
Board 6 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N73 4.401403♠︎s=A♣︎— 1.6027X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N73 4.401403♠︎s=A♣︎— 1.6027X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N73 4.401403♠︎s=9♥︎— 1.6027X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N50 3.00AVE AVE 3.0050X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N40 2.40AVE AVE 3.6060X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N27 1.60P SS 4.4073X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N3 0.20—4♠︎s–2A♥︎100 5.8097X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎sA♣︎= 420
3♠︎sK♣︎= 140
1♠︎sA♥︎+1 110
5♦︎wK♠︎-1 100
4♠︎sA♣︎-1 50
4♠︎sA♣︎-1 50
4♠︎sA♣︎-1 50
3♠︎n*7♦︎-1 100
East passes and South opens 1♠︎. West passes and North responds with ... 4♦︎!! This double-jump-shift is called a splinter bid, showing good support for spades, values for games, and a singleton or void in the suit actually bid. East doubles to get the desired lead and South, who opened quite light, has an easy 4♠︎ call that ends the auction. Defenders take their four side suit tricks and now South's opener is the main focus. If South passes, West opens 1♦︎, and while North-South may get in later, it is unlikely that they get as high as 4♠︎. Even if they do, East-West may outbid them with 5♦︎ and go down one. A close look at the South hand shows eleven points, three of which are extremely dubious (doubleton QJ♦︎). Just pass these. If partner has enough to compete, you'll be fine.
#6 N  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ KQ32Dealer: South
♥︎ Q763 East-West Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ 9V  EAST      
♠︎ 4♣︎ QJ63♠︎ 865
♥︎ A9   ♥︎ JT5
♦︎765432N SOUTH       ♦︎AKT8
♣︎AK75♠︎AJT97♣︎T94
 10 ♥︎K842 3 
11HCP8♦︎QJ6FRK0
 11 ♣︎82 3 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
49834by
E
844107
by
S
49834by
W
844107
Board 7 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N100 6.001702♠︎s+22♥︎— 0.000X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N83 5.001402♠︎s+12♥︎— 1.0017X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N67 4.001102♠︎s=2♥︎— 2.0033X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N50 3.00—2NTn–14♦︎100 3.0050X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N17 1.00—4♠︎s–2T♣︎200 5.0083X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N17 1.00—3♠︎s–24♣︎200 5.0083X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N17 1.00—3NTn–26♦︎200 5.0083X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nn4♦︎= 600
5♣︎e*K♠︎-2 500
2♠︎s9♦︎= 110
5♣︎eK♠︎-1 100
3♠︎s4♣︎-1 100
4♠︎s*7♣︎-1 200
4♠︎s9♦︎-2 200
4♠︎s4♦︎-2 200
South opens 1♠︎ and West passes. North responds 1NT and East passes. How many spades does North promise with the 1NT bid? The answer may surprise you: zero! Bidding a new suit at the two level requires ten points, so North may have a distributional hand of 5-9 points for 1NT. East considers an unusual 2NT call with 6-5 in the majors, but the vulnerability suggests pass is safer. South's seven spades demand a spade rebid, but 2♠︎ is more than enough. Three of South's 14 points are the singleton K♦︎, which may be worth nothing, and the hand contains no aces. It's a minimum, not worth an invite, as the Section A pairs in 4♠︎ found out! Even without the bad trump break, South is still an underdog in 4♠︎ on these cards.
#7 V  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ J8Dealer: East
♥︎ JT654 Both Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ QT75V  EAST      
♠︎ AT97♣︎ AJ♠︎
♥︎ AQ2   ♥︎ 73
♦︎983V SOUTH       ♦︎AJ642
♣︎QT4♠︎KQ65432♣︎987532
 9 ♥︎K98 3 
12HCP5♦︎K0FRK9
 14 ♣︎K6 7 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
58843by
E
75599
by
S
58843by
W
75599
Board 8 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N100 6.0010106♠︎n+17♣︎— 0.000X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N58 3.505104♠︎n+33♣︎— 2.5042X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N58 3.505104♠︎n+37♣︎— 2.5042X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N58 3.505104♠︎n+37♣︎— 2.5042X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N58 3.505104♠︎n+33♣︎— 2.5042X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N17 1.004804♠︎n+29♣︎— 5.0083X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N0 0.004504♥︎s+15♠︎— 6.00100X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
6♠︎n3♣︎+1 1010
6♠︎nT♠︎+1 1010
6♠︎n7♥︎+1 1010
6♠︎nT♣︎+1 1010
6♠︎nT♠︎= 980
5♠︎n5♦︎+1 480
4♠︎n6♠︎+2 480
7♠︎n8♥︎-1 50
West passes and North-South have this uncontested auction to 6♠︎: 1♠︎ (North first) - 2♥︎, 3♦︎ - 3♠︎ (three-card support), 4♣︎ (first of three cuebids) - 4♦︎, 4♥︎ - 4♠︎, 4NT - 5♦︎, 5NT - 6♦︎, 6♠︎. North knows that South's 5♦︎ response shows specifically the A♦︎, since the earlier cuebid promised at least second round control and North has the KQ♦︎. 5NT normally promises all the aces, but a void in place of a known missing ace will do. But over 5NT, 6♦︎ might be the good-as-gold K♣︎, or the almost useless K♥︎. Plus, knowing about the Q♠︎ would be useful. Two conventions that would help here are Roman Key Card Blackwood, to find the Q♠︎, and Specific Kings Over 5NT to discover that South has the K♥︎ and not the K♣︎. Thirteen tricks are there if you simply ruff two clubs in dummy and play for spades and diamonds to break.
#8 N  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ AK8643Dealer: West
♥︎ None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ KQ72N  EAST      
♠︎ 95♣︎ AQ4♠︎ T2
♥︎ AQ42   ♥︎ 875
♦︎943N SOUTH       ♦︎J85
♣︎8652♠︎QJ7♣︎KT973
 18 ♥︎KJT963 7 
6HCP4♦︎AT61FRK2
 12 ♣︎J 5 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
111311139by
E
20203
by
S
111311139by
W
20203
Board 9 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N83 5.002002NTw–27♦︎— 1.0017X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N83 5.002002NTw–27♦︎— 1.0017X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N83 5.002002NTw–27♦︎— 1.0017X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N42 2.501002NTw–17♦︎— 3.5058X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N42 2.501002NTw–17♦︎— 3.5058X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N17 1.00—1♣︎w+1J♦︎90 5.0083X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N0 0.00—1NTw+17♦︎120 6.00100X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2Nw7♦︎-2 200
1Ns*K♥︎= 180
1♣︎wT♠︎+1 90
2♦︎n6♣︎-2 100
1♠︎eQ♦︎+1 110
1♥︎w8♠︎+1 110
1♣︎w3♥︎+2 110
1♣︎w8♠︎+3 130
Three passes precede West's opening bid and three passes follow it. Some will open 1♣︎ and play it there, unless North overcalls 1♦︎ or South avoids passing out 1♣︎ by making a takeout double. West might also upgrade to 20 for three of the four aces and open 2NT and play it there. In 1♣︎ or 2NT, West's main challenge will be finding enough entries to dummy to take finesses against the K♠︎ and the A♥︎ in the South hand. A diamond lead will allow West to capture South's queen and later win the T♦︎. Another dummy entry can come from playing clubs from the top, creating a third-round entry to dummy. 2NT may be tricky, but those left in 1♣︎ should have no trouble making an overtrick and possibly even more.
#9 D  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ T86Dealer: North
♥︎ J43 East-West Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ KJ872V  EAST      
♠︎ AJ3♣︎ K5♠︎ Q95
♥︎ KQT9   ♥︎ 865
♦︎A3N SOUTH       ♦︎T965
♣︎AJT9♠︎K742♣︎Q86
 8 ♥︎A72 2 
19HCP4♦︎Q41FRK0
 9 ♣︎7432 1 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
45464by
E
87878
by
S
56465by
W
87978
Board 10 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N100 6.001102♥︎s=5♦︎— 0.000X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N75 4.50—2♠︎e=4♥︎110 1.5025X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N75 4.50—2♥︎s=8♦︎110 1.5025X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N42 2.50—2♠︎e+1Q♥︎140 3.5058X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N42 2.50—2♠︎e+1Q♥︎140 3.5058X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N17 1.00—2♠︎e+2T♦︎170 5.0083X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N0 0.00—3♥︎s–34♠︎300 6.00100X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♥︎e8♣︎-2 200
3♠︎e8♣︎-1 100
4♠︎e4♥︎-1 100
3♠︎e8♣︎= 140
1♠︎e4♥︎+2 140
3♠︎e3♥︎= 140
3♠︎eK♣︎= 140
3♠︎eQ♥︎+1 170
East opens 1♠︎ and South passes. West has five points and two doubletons, and most will find this hand difficult to pass. 1NT is the only response possible, but upon hearing this, East will jump rebid 3♥︎, and West's goose is cooked. West will reluctantly bid 3NT (3♠︎ here promises three-card support and is forcing) and it's not a bad contract, depending on the K♠︎ being onside (it's not). Some Easts will instead rebid 3♠︎ with the six-card suit. This at least can be passed by West for a plus score, but fails any time West has hearts and not spades, a reasonable possibility on this auction. JACK chose to pass the opening bid of 1♠︎ but it's less likely that a human player will pass with the Wst hand.
#10 V  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ T73Dealer: South
♥︎ K2 Both Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ J743V  EAST      
♠︎ J4♣︎ Q942♠︎ AQ8652
♥︎ T9   ♥︎ A875
♦︎A9652V SOUTH       ♦︎Q
♣︎T763♠︎K9♣︎A5
 6 ♥︎QJ643 1 
5HCP16♦︎KT83FRK6
 13 ♣︎KJ8 2 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
54677by
E
89555
by
S
54677by
W
89555
Board 11 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N100 6.001102♥︎n=8♣︎— 0.000X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N75 4.50504♠︎w–1A♥︎— 1.5025X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N75 4.50503♠︎w–1A♥︎— 1.5025X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N42 2.50—4♥︎n–1Q♠︎50 3.5058X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N42 2.50—4♥︎n–13♠︎50 3.5058X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N17 1.00—5♥︎n–5Q♠︎250 5.0083X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N0 0.00—5♦︎**n–43♠︎1600 6.00100X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♥︎sK♠︎= 450
4♥︎sA♠︎+1 450
4♥︎sA♠︎= 420
4♥︎sA♠︎= 420
5♠︎wA♥︎-3 150
3♥︎sA♠︎-1 50
5♥︎nQ♠︎-3 150
5♥︎sA♠︎-3 150
South passes and West opens 1♠︎. North bids 2♠︎, a Michaels cuebid showing hearts and an unknown minor, at least five of each. East passes and South raises to 4♥︎. West considers sacrificing in 4♠︎ but the math doesn't quite work: if 4♥︎ makes and 4♠︎ is doubled, West needs to make 8 tricks to show a profit, and partner is not going to provide much. After cashing two high spades, West should switch to a trump. South now is limited to the trump trick, seven more trumps via crossruff, and the A♣︎, and needs one more. At some point, South will need to pull trumps and give up a trick in a minor suit to set it up, while still retaining a trump to control a spade return. Not easy unless the defenders make it so, by leading the A♦︎ or some other error.
#11 N  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ 84Dealer: East
♥︎ AKQ63 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ KQT863N  EAST      
♠︎ AKJ762♣︎ ♠︎ Q3
♥︎ 4   ♥︎ T87
♦︎AJ72N SOUTH       ♦︎954
♣︎Q3♠︎T95♣︎KJ842
 14 ♥︎J952 9 
15HCP6♦︎6FRK2
 5 ♣︎AT9765 7 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
641075by
E
77247
by
S
641075by
W
77256
Board 12 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N100 6.001402♠︎s+1Q♣︎— 0.000X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N83 5.001003♣︎w–22♠︎— 1.0017X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N67 4.00801♠︎s=5♦︎— 2.0033X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N50 3.00503♦︎e–1A♠︎— 3.0050X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N25 1.50—4♠︎s–1T♣︎100 4.5075X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N25 1.50—3♠︎s–19♦︎100 4.5075X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N0 0.00—4♠︎s–29♦︎200 6.00100X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3NsQ♣︎-1 100
3♠︎s9♦︎-1 100
3NsT♣︎-1 100
3♦︎eQ♠︎= 110
2♦︎eA♠︎+2 130
3♠︎s9♦︎-2 200
4♠︎sA♣︎-2 200
4♠︎s9♦︎-2 200
West and North pass and East opens 1♦︎ in third seat. South makes a takeout double and West bids 3♣︎. A jump shift after a negative double is a pre-empt, so North and East pass and South lets the auction end there rather than bidding 3♠︎. Good choice: the defenders easily take two offside red kings, an eventual trump winner, and two spades for down one and a plus score for North-South that would have been a top board in Section A. If South bids 3♠︎ it will be a struggle but eventually will end in defeat. Sometimes all you need to do for a good score is pass and make sure you don't lose any tricks on defense.
#12 V  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ 942Dealer: West
♥︎ JT952 North-South Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ Q2N  EAST      
♠︎ JT♣︎ 754♠︎ 853
♥︎ 843   ♥︎ AQ6
♦︎95V SOUTH       ♦︎AJT643
♣︎AQJT62♠︎AKQ76♣︎3
 3 ♥︎K7 2 
8HCP11♦︎K874FRK5
 18 ♣︎K98 2 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
68744by
E
65698
by
S
68744by
W
65598
Board 13 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N100 6.003004♦︎e–3Q♠︎— 0.000X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N75 4.501403♥︎s=3♠︎— 1.5025X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N75 4.501403♥︎s=7♣︎— 1.5025X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N50 3.001102♥︎s=3♠︎— 3.0050X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N33 2.001003♠︎e–1A♥︎— 4.0067X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N17 1.00—3♥︎s–13♠︎100 5.0083X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N0 0.00—4♥︎s–28♠︎200 6.00100X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎wJ♣︎-3 300
3♠︎wJ♣︎-3 300
4♠︎eQ♠︎-2 200
3♥︎sA♣︎= 140
2♣︎s7♥︎+2 130
3♥︎sA♣︎-1 100
3♥︎sA♣︎-1 100
3♥︎s*7♦︎-2 500
North passes and East opens 1NT. South jumps to a pre-emptive 3♥︎. West bids 3♠︎, a non-forcing call with at least five spades. West would double with any game-going hand, so once North passes, East does as well, and South steps right in with a 4♥︎ call. West and North pass and East doubles happily. Three passes follow and North's dummy leaves poor South in big trouble that gets worse later when trumps don't behave. Down three doubled is the likely result for poor South, who we hope has learned the lesson that you only get to pre-empt once in a hand, a second raise is usually fatal.
#13 D  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ J72Dealer: North
♥︎ Both Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ Q62V  EAST      
♠︎ 86543♣︎ JT96543♠︎ AKT9
♥︎ 74   ♥︎ KQ53
♦︎8753V SOUTH       ♦︎K94
♣︎A7♠︎Q♣︎Q2
 4 ♥︎AJT9862 8 
4HCP17♦︎AJT3FRK1
 15 ♣︎K8 7 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
658610by
E
76563
by
S
658610by
W
67463
Board 14 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N100 6.005104♠︎n+3K♣︎— 0.000X1EJohanne Leach &
Lynne Pomfret
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N83 5.004804♠︎n+28♥︎— 1.0017X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Vicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
X1N67 4.004504♠︎n+1K♣︎— 2.0033X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N33 2.004204♠︎n=J♣︎— 4.0067X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N33 2.004204♠︎n=J♣︎— 4.0067X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N33 2.004204♠︎n=J♣︎— 4.0067X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N0 0.00—4♠︎n–1K♣︎50 6.00100X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎nK♣︎+2 480
4♠︎nK♣︎+2 480
4♠︎nK♣︎+2 480
4♠︎nK♣︎+1 450
4♠︎nK♣︎= 420
4♠︎nK♣︎= 420
4♠︎nK♣︎= 420
4♠︎nK♣︎= 420
Three passes to North, who opens 1♠︎ in fourth seat. East passes and South bids 2♣︎, a convention named after Toronto's Doug Drury, who needed protection from wild third and fourth seat openers made by his partners! The modern version of the Drury convention asks opener to repeat his suit at the two level if the opening bid was shaded, otherwise do something else. North does something else, jumping to 3♠︎ to show rebiddable spades and a good hand. Cuebids of 4♦︎ and 4♥︎ follow before South settles in 4♠︎ and North passes. East leads the K♣︎: North wins the ace and runs the Q♠︎ successfully, revealing the break. A spade to the ten and then the A♠︎ pulls trumps, and a diamond to the ace follows. The T♥︎ wins, then the Q♦︎ is covered and ruffed. A♥︎, heart ruff dropping West's K♥︎, J♦︎ pitching the 8♣︎, club ruff, making seven!! Wow!
#14 N  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ AT9865Dealer: South
♥︎ AQJ3 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ 8N  EAST      
♠︎ K73♣︎ A8♠︎
♥︎ K74   ♥︎ 98652
♦︎KT532N SOUTH       ♦︎764
♣︎92♠︎QJ42♣︎KQJ43
 15 ♥︎T 6 
9HCP6♦︎AQJ92FRK7
 10 ♣︎T765 3 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
1013778by
E
20555
by
S
1013668by
W
20665
Board 15 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N100 6.00—3♣︎s–1T♦︎100 0.000X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N83 5.00—2♦︎w+37♣︎150 1.0017X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N67 4.00—4♣︎s–2A♠︎200 2.0033X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N42 2.50—5♣︎s–3A♦︎300 3.5058X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N42 2.50—5♣︎s–3A♠︎300 3.5058X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N17 1.00—5♠︎e+1J♣︎480 5.0083X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N0 0.00—4♠︎e+33♥︎510 6.00100X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♦︎wA♣︎+1 420
5♦︎wA♣︎+1 420
4♠︎e3♥︎+3 510
4♠︎e3♥︎+3 510
5♠︎e3♥︎+2 510
4♠︎e2♥︎+3 510
4♠︎w4♦︎+3 510
5♦︎w*A♣︎+1 650
South opens a pre-emptive 3♣︎ and West overcalls 3♦︎. North raises to 4♣︎ and East chooses 5♦︎, which ends the auction. 5♦︎ is an easy twelve tricks, but the slam is there in spades as well, so the court of Bridge Appeals is quickly convened to decide who was to blame. West thinks that East should have bid 4♠︎ on the way to 5♦︎, to uncover the spade fit. East thinks West could have passed over 3♦︎ and let West decide what to do, even after the 4♣︎ call made that decision a little harder. The tribunal of judges met for some time before announcing a six-word verdict: "nobody's to blame: sometimes pre-empts work!"
#15 V  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ 73Dealer: East
♥︎ KJT9876 North-South Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ 4N  EAST      
♠︎ AKJ5♣︎ AT7♠︎ Q9642
♥︎ 2   ♥︎ AQ54
♦︎AT9872V SOUTH       ♦︎KQ3
♣︎62♠︎T8♣︎5
 8 ♥︎3 7 
12HCP13♦︎J656FRK4
 7 ♣︎KQJ9843 7 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
00709by
E
6126124
by
S
00709by
W
6126124
Board 16 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X6N100 6.0010206NTn+12♣︎— 0.000X4ECarol Linda Ward &
David Rosenberg
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N75 4.505203NTn+43♦︎— 1.5025X7EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Scott Turner &
John Fraser
X7N75 4.505203NTn+44♣︎— 1.5025X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N50 3.005104♠︎n+37♦︎— 3.0050X5ELee Laxton &
Donna Bridgeman
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N25 1.504903NTn+32♣︎— 4.5075X8ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Faye Wightman &
Diane Hardouin
X2N25 1.504903NTn+32♥︎— 4.5075X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N0 0.004804♠︎s+27♣︎— 6.00100X2EWendy Chapman &
Linda Collins
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
6♠︎s9♦︎+1 1010
6♠︎n8♦︎+1 1010
6♠︎n4♥︎+1 1010
6♠︎n6♠︎+1 1010
6♠︎n8♦︎+1 1010
3Nn9♥︎+4 520
4♠︎n2♣︎+3 510
4♠︎n2♥︎+3 510
North opens 1NT, South bids a Stayman 2♣︎, and North admits to a four-card major with 2♠︎. When opener starts with 1NT, 4NT by responder is a point-count based slam try, even after a Stayman or transfer sequence. To ask about aces, responder South instead bids 4♣︎, the Gerber Convention. 4♥︎ from North says 'one ace' (not necessarily hearts), and 5♣︎ asks for kings. 5♠︎ says 'two of them' and South bids a confident 6♠︎, which makes seven when both missing kings are onside. JACK takes this a step further, reserving 4♣︎ as a splinter raise (with a singleton club) and using 4♥︎ as the ace-asking bid. Science like this is great, but only if both partners are on the same page!
#16 N  NORTH       October 19, 2026.
♠︎ KQ75Dealer: West
♥︎ AQ East-West Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ KQ6V  EAST      
♠︎ J82♣︎ JT65♠︎ 64
♥︎ KT7653   ♥︎ 942
♦︎94N SOUTH       ♦︎8753
♣︎73♠︎AT93♣︎K942
 17 ♥︎J8 1 
4HCP3♦︎AJT24FRK1
 16 ♣︎AQ8 1 
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
 in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
131381312by
E
00501
by
S
131381312by
W
00501

Work In Progress! This HTML page with results combines the ACBLscore results, the BridgeMate data, and the actual cards in each hand to make a page that displays nicely on most screens. I'll continue to develop it as I hear about problems from people. So far I have only really had time to test it on the large monitor I have at home. I've done a little bit of work in making it fit on my iPhone 15 screen (turned sideways), but the typical cellphone screen is not wide enough to display the hands alongside the results, so it relocates the hands below the results and you may need to scroll down a bit. The key is in the tabs at the top, which mean you don't need to scroll to get from the main results all the way to Board 32! Just click or tap on what you want to see next!

Two things that may help: If your browser program is old, some of the tech in this page might not work 100%: the system of tabs at the top of the page requires a recent version. You really aren't doing your computer many favours if you avoid requests to upgrade the programs you use most often, like browsers. If the page works but there are large areas of a monitor unused, you might be able to make it more readable by adjusting the size of things with CTRL + (plus key), which upsizes text and other screen elements a bit. CTRL + (minus key) also works if you go too far, and CTRL + (zero) resets to the default. (This doesn't work on cellphone screens.)

How is a pair's matchpoint score on a board calculated? Your raw score is compared one by one with all of the other raw scores on the board made by pairs sitting in your direction. You get one matchpoint for each score you beat, and a half-point for each score that is the same as yours. The top score on a board is one less than the number of times it is played. If the board was not played as many times as other boards for some reason, the scores may be factored up to compensate, so that each board has the same top score.

How is a pair's total score calculated? The scoring program first checks all boards to see how many times they have been played. Usually this will be the same for all boards, but if there is a sitout or a glitch of some sort in the movement, or an artificially assigned score due to an irregularity, the scoring program must first FACTOR scores on boards played fewer times, so that the top score on every board is the same. Once that is done, the scoring program also checks to see that each pair played the same number of boards: some may have sat out and missed a round: these pairs will have their total matchpoints FACTORED so that they get matchpoints for the boards they missed, based on their percentage on the boards they did play. The total of all this summing and factoring is your final score.

How does this factoring work exactly? There are actually two types of factoring: the most common is to factor a pair's score that has not played as many boards as the other pairs. Their sum of matchpoints on the boards they played, is divided by the number of boards they played, and then multiplied by the number of boards most pairs played. The other type is covered in the next question.

I have the best score on a board but got slightly fewer matchpoints than tops on other boards, why is that? This is the other type of factoring, which happens when a board is played fewer times than other boards for some reason. Maybe a pair didn't get to it, or there was a artificial score assigned after an irregularity. Factoring a board has to take into account the small chance that, had it been played the correct number of times, the extra plays might have produced a score that is better than the current top, or lower than the current bottom. To do so, the ACBL and the World Bridge Federation use the Neuberg formula, which you can read about on Wikipedia if you want the complete details. It has its detractors, but is sort of like Winston Churchill's ranking of democracy as the second-worst system of government ... all the others being tied for first!

HCP and FRK, what on earth are they? HCP stands for highcard points, and the four numbers surrounding it show how many points each player has in a hand. The colour behind the word "HCP" is gray when the 40 points are evenly distributed between North-South and East-West, but turns more and more orange (North-South) or purple (East-West) if one side has a majority. FRK stands for Freakness, a way to describe just how freaky a hand's distribution is, on a scale from 0-20, with average for a hand being just slightly less than 3, and the average for a full deal, the sum of the freakness ratings of the four hands, is about 11.93 on average. A hand gets one freakness point for each card in a suit beyond the fourth, or less than three; plus a bonus if the hand contains at least one void (2 points) or at least one singleton but no void (1 point). The background colour behind the "FRK" shows whether the deal is hot (red), average (gray), or cold (blue) in terms of Freakness! Freakness was created by bridge expert Richard Pavlicek and searching for "pavlicek freakness" will get you quickly to his article on the subject.

Something New! The tabs with the board numbers now indicate which side had the bulk of the high-card points (above the board number: NS: orange, EW: purple, evenly-split: gray), and the freakness rating of the deal as a whole (below the board number: flat: blue, average: gray, freaky: red)! Want to see only the hands where N-S had the points, or the freakiest ones? Check the tabs!

What are "tricks available" and how are they calculated? Computers these days can analyze all the possible legal play lines on a deal, given a trump suit (or notrump) and a declarer, and sort all of these lines into successes and failures to come up with an optimum line of play that perfect defenders and a perfect declarer would take. The result of this line of play is the "tricks available" and is sometimes unrealistic, requiring opening leads that few if any would find, or declarer taking only the finesses that work and dropping offside singleton honours where possible. You will very quickly see from the results which deals have unrealistic "tricks available" expectations, and it is often a fun exercise to work out how you can make that many tricks. But for most deals, it is a fairly good guide as to how high a pair should bid.

Why are the masterpoints not the same as what is on ACBL Live for Clubs? This is in my view an own goal by ACBL: they have new rules for club game masterpoints but are not willing to expend the time to upgrade ACBLscore to show the masterpoints under the new rules. Luckily, most masterpoint awards actually get bigger when they go through the "engine" and are reposted on Live. The main effect is to give more masterpoints to games where the non-sitting out pairs play more boards. The problem is that the masterpoint awards that come out of ACBLscore, before being posted online, are not what you eventually get.

How can I contact McBruce to tell him what's not working for me? By e-mail: oogashawca@gmail.com or bm@mcbruce.ca (the old shaw.ca address is gone)