VanLearners Section X Monday Evening June 8, 2026

Results for Section X, North-South
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X2N 66.67% 40.0010.30Eiler Eis - Bob Hodgkinson
X3N 63.33% 38.0020.21Alexa Allen - Jacquie Brown
X4N 54.17% 32.50Joan Christensen - Carol Linda Ward
X1N 35.00% 21.00John Fraser - Jandi Fraser
X5N 30.83% 18.50Francesco L Piccone - M Piccone
East-West had 51.34% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 13.61, a bit above the average of about 11.93.
Results for Section X, East-West
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X1E 66.67% 40.0010.30David Hsu - Amanda Hill
X4E 54.17% 32.5020.21Vicki Torbett - Doug MacDougall
X5E 52.50% 31.50Mike Bow - Kelly Anderson
X3E 42.50% 25.50Barbara Spitz - Marlee Sheinin
X2E 34.17% 20.50Doug Stewart - Louise Forsyth
East-West had 51.34% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 13.61, a bit above the average of about 11.93.
Board 1 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N100 4.004♠︎e+2♦︎2480 0.000X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N75 3.004♠︎e+3♦︎4510 1.0025X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N38 1.506♠︎e+1♥︎51010 2.5063X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N38 1.506♠︎e+1♥︎51010 2.5063X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N0 0.007♠︎e=♦︎21510 4.00100X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎e8♣︎+3 510
4♠︎e4♦︎+3 510
6♠︎e6♦︎+1 1010
6♠︎e6♣︎+1 1010
6♠︎eT♠︎+1 1010
6♠︎e6♦︎+1 1010
East-West bid uncontested to slam beginning with East's opener: 1♠︎ - 2NT*, 3NT* - 4NT, 5♥︎ - 5NT, 6♥︎ - 6♠︎. 2NT is the Jacoby forcing raise, showing opening values and at least four-card support (never three) for opener's suit. East's 3NT shows extras, about a king more than a minimum opener, but no singleton or void (rebidding a new suit over the 2NT response shows shortness). 4NT is Blackwood and the East shows two aces and two kings. West settles for 6♠︎ not knowing which king is missing. 6NT scores well but the defenders can hold it to six for 990, while 6♠︎ makes all the tricks when the hearts break 3-3, allowing East to pitch a diamond from dummy and ruff the 5♦︎. 
#1 D  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ Q6Dealer: N
♥︎ 984 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ KJ73N  EAST      
♠︎ AK982♣︎ Q974♠︎ J7543
♥︎ AQ3♥︎ KT72
♦︎Q9N SOUTH       ♦︎A5
♣︎JT5♠︎T♣︎AK
8♥︎J651
16HCP15♦︎T86422FRK3
1♣︎86324
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
10155by
E
12131288
by
S
10155by
W
12131288
Board 2 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N88 3.50503♠︎w–1♣︎K 0.5013X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N88 3.50503♠︎w–1♥︎Q 0.5013X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N50 2.002NTe+1♥︎6150 2.0050X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N25 1.004♥︎s–2♠︎9200 3.0075X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N0 0.003NTn–4♦︎8400 4.00100X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎wK♣︎-2 100
3♥︎sQ♠︎-1 100
2♠︎wK♣︎+1 140
2♠︎wT♦︎+1 140
2♠︎wQ♥︎+2 170
3♠︎w7♦︎+1 170
East opens 1♦︎ and South passes. West bids 1♠︎ and North passes, not having a good option despite the best hand at the table. East rebids 1NT, showing 12-14 balanced. South passes and West jumps to 3♠︎, inviting game, and East passes quickly, recounting and finding only 11. Is the East hand really an opener? Maybe not. If East passes, West will open 2♠︎ and poor North will be similarly stuck. 3♠︎ can only be defeated if North leads a club to dummy's ace, wins the first trump with the A♠︎, cashes a high club, and leads a third to give South a ruff. Note that West is in even more trouble with the 3♠︎ call if East is one of those players who rebids notrump with a singleton in partner's suit (DON'T!)...
#2 V  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ AK6Dealer: E
♥︎ Q4 NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ T763D  EAST      
♠︎ QJT973♣︎ KQT8♠︎ 84
♥︎ A2♥︎ KT5
♦︎K4V SOUTH       ♦︎QJ98
♣︎643♠︎52♣︎AJ72
14♥︎J987631
10HCP11♦︎A524FRK1
5♣︎954
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
54856by
E
88577
by
S
54856by
W
88577
Board 3 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N88 3.504603NTs+2♥︎6 0.5013X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N88 3.504603NTs+2♥︎6 0.5013X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N38 1.504005♣︎n=♥︎4 2.5063X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N38 1.504005♣︎n=♥︎4 2.5063X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N0 0.001402♥︎n+1♠︎T 4.00100X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ns6♥︎+3 490
3Ns6♥︎+3 490
4♥︎n6♦︎= 420
2Ns6♥︎+2 180
2Ns6♥︎+1 150
2Ns5♠︎= 120
South and West pass and North opens 1♣︎. East passes and South bids 1NT. West passes and North rebids 2♥︎, a "reverse" since the rebid suit is higher than the opened suit, forcing responder to the three level to prefer the first suit. A reverse shows about an ace more than a minimum opener, and a longer opened suit than the rebid suit (not equal). South must be careful not to simply bid 3♣︎, which will look to North like a signoff. South's options are: 4♣︎ (about 9-10 points with club support), 3NT, 5♣︎, and even 4♥︎. The last three are gambling actions, and the best bid is probably 4♣︎, which North will happily raise to game. 3NT and 4♥︎ make this time, but 5♣︎ is the safest plus.
#3 N  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ ADealer: S
♥︎ KT92 EW Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ AQ9V  EAST      
♠︎ J75♣︎ AJ753♠︎ KT9864
♥︎ AJ763♥︎ 4
♦︎K73D SOUTH       ♦︎T854
♣︎86♠︎Q32♣︎42
18♥︎Q854
9HCP3♦︎J622FRK6
10♣︎KQT90
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
11710911by
E
26341
by
S
11710911by
W
26341
Board 4 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N100 4.006204♥︎s=♦︎3 0.000X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N63 2.501403♥︎s=♦︎A 1.5038X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N63 2.501402♥︎s+1♣︎8 1.5038X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N25 1.001003♦︎e–1♠︎3 3.0075X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N0 0.002♦︎e+1♠︎4110 4.00100X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♥︎sT♣︎+1 170
2♥︎sT♣︎+1 140
1♠︎n5♥︎= 80
2NsT♣︎-1 100
2♦︎e4♠︎+2 130
2Nw6♠︎+1 150
West opens 1♣︎ (1♦︎ is OK here in case the opponents take over and partner ends up on lead) and North overcalls 1♠︎. East raises to 2♣︎ or 2♦︎ and South bids 2♥︎. This seems unlikely to be coming from a mere four-card suit, so North raises to 3♥︎ and South happily bids 4♥︎. There's only one way to go down: West must smoothly duck the first spade lead from South and hope South guesses to play the jack. If West plays the ace, South can win the second round with the king and ruff the rest in hand, losing only West's three aces. If West thinks and ducks, South should have no trouble playing West for the ace and plays the king. West hesitated and East had the A♠︎? Call the director; that's a foul.
#4 V  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ KJT65Dealer: W
♥︎ KQT All Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ 964V  EAST      
♠︎ A872♣︎ KQ♠︎ Q9
♥︎ A64♥︎ 5
♦︎A83V SOUTH       ♦︎KJT752
♣︎T98♠︎43♣︎7532
14♥︎J987322
12HCP6♦︎Q0FRK6
8♣︎AJ646
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
571046by
E
85396
by
S
471046by
W
85396
Board 5 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N100 4.001103♣︎n=♦︎Q 0.000X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N75 3.000PASS0 1.0025X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N50 2.003♥︎s–1♠︎A100 2.0050X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N13 0.503♠︎w=♥︎K140 3.5088X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N13 0.503♠︎w=♥︎K140 3.5088X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1NnQ♦︎+2 150
4♠︎wK♥︎-1 50
PASSOUT00
4♣︎nQ♠︎-1 100
3♠︎wK♥︎= 140
3♠︎wK♥︎= 140
North doesn't have an opener. It may look like eleven points and two doubletons, but one is the KQ and giving yourself six total for that is inflationary. Aceless hands deserve a one-point penalty, so North should pass. East does too and South opens 1♥︎ and East overcalls 1♠︎ on very similar suits. Now North can re-enter with a 2♣︎ call, and when East raises to 3♠︎, South has no trouble competing to 4♣︎. 3♠︎ makes so down one is OK unless they double 4♣︎, but with very careful play ten tricks can be made despite the 4-0 trump break, losing only a spade, a diamond, and a trump. North opening 1♣︎ on this dross usually gets South excited enough to overbid. Aceless? Subtract a point and be safe!
#5 D  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ K5Dealer: N
♥︎ KQ NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ 9742N  EAST      
♠︎ A9642♣︎ QJT86♠︎ QJ73
♥︎ T8♥︎ J643
♦︎K8V SOUTH       ♦︎QJT53
♣︎A974♠︎T8♣︎
11♥︎A97523
11HCP7♦︎A63FRK6
11♣︎K5323
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
748510by
E
49463
by
S
748510by
W
49463
Board 6 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N100 4.002003NTw–2♦︎2 0.000X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N75 3.002♠︎w+1♣︎5140 1.0025X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N38 1.503♠︎w+1♥︎8170 2.5063X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N38 1.502♠︎w+2♣︎Q170 2.5063X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N0 0.004♠︎w=♦︎2620 4.00100X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♠︎w8♥︎+1 140
2Nw8♥︎+2 180
3NwJ♠︎= 600
4♠︎wQ♣︎= 620
4♠︎wJ♠︎= 620
4♠︎w9♠︎= 620
East opens 2♦︎, South passes, and West bids 2NT. Lots of ways to play 2NT here: some play it as an asking bid about the opening weak-two, with the four suits indicating combinations of good-bad hand-suit (the Ogust convention), others play that 2NT asks for a side ace or king, as here. West hears about East's side card in clubs and decides two club stoppers is just what is needed for a shot at 3NT. All depends on diamonds: most will start by running the J♦︎ lead to South's king. On the second round, when West leads the 4♦︎, North covers with the nine, and later must win a second diamond with the ten. But now declarer has a heart to establish and four diamonds, two spades and two clubs, nine tricks. 
#6 N  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ JT9Dealer: E
♥︎ 863 EW Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ T962D  EAST      
♠︎ AK432♣︎ QJ5♠︎ 876
♥︎ KQ94♥︎ 2
♦︎J4N SOUTH       ♦︎AQ8753
♣︎A7♠︎Q5♣︎K98
4♥︎AJT750
17HCP9♦︎K3FRK5
10♣︎T64326
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
32525by
E
9118118
by
S
32525by
W
9118118
Board 7 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N100 4.002003NTw–2♥︎5 0.000X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N75 3.001102♥︎n=♠︎J 1.0025X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N50 2.001003NTw–1♥︎5 2.0050X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N25 1.001NTw=♥︎590 3.0075X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N0 0.001NTw+1♥︎5120 4.00100X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nw5♥︎-2 200
2♠︎sA♦︎+1 140
3Nw5♥︎-1 100
1Nw5♥︎= 90
1Nw4♣︎= 90
3Nw5♥︎= 600
South passes and West opens 1♦︎. North overcalls 1♥︎ and East passes. South should resist the urge to show some values with a 1♠︎ "save" and pass. It will take very good opponents to figure out that this is a good final spot for them. West rebids 1NT, showing a balanced hand of more than 17 (with 15-17 West would have opened 1NT, not 1♦︎). North tries 2♣︎ to complete the picture and East doubles for penalties. Now is the time for South to save to 2♠︎. This is passed around to East, who bids .... 3♠︎, a special cuebid asking if partner has a spade stopper. West does and bids 3NT. Can it be made? Maybe, but if North persists in hearts and does not try leading the K♠︎, it should go down. 
#7 V  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ K4Dealer: S
♥︎ AQ852 All Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ T6V  EAST      
♠︎ AQ73♣︎ AT94♠︎ J
♥︎ K93♥︎ JT64
♦︎AQ74D SOUTH       ♦︎K92
♣︎K8♠︎T98652♣︎Q7532
13♥︎73
18HCP7♦︎J8531FRK4
2♣︎J66
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
57554by
E
86888
by
S
57554by
W
86889
Board 8 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N100 4.002♦︎w+1♥︎3110 0.000X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N63 2.503♠︎e+1♥︎7170 1.5038X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N63 2.502♠︎e+2♥︎7170 1.5038X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N13 0.504♠︎e=♥︎7420 3.5088X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N13 0.504♠︎e=♥︎7420 3.5088X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎sQ♠︎-2 100
2♠︎e2♣︎+1 140
3♠︎e7♥︎= 140
2♠︎e2♥︎+2 170
4♠︎eK♥︎= 420
4♠︎eQ♦︎+1 450
West opens 1♦︎, North passes, and East responds 1♠︎. South passes and West raises to 2♠︎. North and East pass and South decides not to "sell out" to 2♠︎ and competes with 3♥︎. Beware when a passed-hand partner bids in the passout seat, for these 'balancing' bids may be weaker than you expect! West and North pass and East competes to 3♠︎. Now, South and West pass and North cannot resist bidding 4♥︎ for no good reason. East competes again to 4♠︎ and when the K♣︎ is onside emerges with ten tricks and a good score. North should have let sleeping dogs lie in 3♠︎ rather than invite the opponents to a makeable game!
#8 N  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ 93Dealer: W
♥︎ AQ3 None Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ A652N  EAST      
♠︎ Q74♣︎ 9864♠︎ AKJT65
♥︎ 54♥︎ T8
♦︎KJ94N SOUTH       ♦︎T83
♣︎AQJ7♠︎82♣︎T3
10♥︎KJ97621
13HCP8♦︎Q71FRK4
9♣︎K524
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
42744by
E
610699
by
S
42744by
W
610699
Board 9 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N88 3.501003♠︎w–1♥︎8 0.5013X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N88 3.501003♠︎w–1♥︎8 0.5013X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N50 2.003♥︎s–1♠︎A50 2.0050X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N25 1.002♠︎w=♥︎8110 3.0075X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N0 0.003♠︎w=♥︎8140 4.00100X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎w8♥︎-2 200
3♠︎w8♥︎= 140
3♠︎w8♥︎= 140
4♥︎sA♠︎-3 150
3♠︎w8♥︎+1 170
4♠︎w8♥︎= 620
North and East pass and South opens 1♥︎. West makes a pre-emptive jump overcall of 2♠︎. Twelve points may seem a bit strong for a pre-empt, but experience teaches that after partner has passed, near openers with long suits are best handled with a pre-emptive jump, to maximize the disrupting of the opponents auction. North passes and East raises to 3♠︎, and that's too much disruption for South to handle, so 3♠︎ is the final contract. West emerges with an overtrick only because in both red suits the missing ace-queen are both under the king-jack. 21 combined points is usually not enough to bid game unless you feel lucky.
#9 D  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ 86Dealer: N
♥︎ 8 EW Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ AQT83V  EAST      
♠︎ AQT753♣︎ J9863♠︎ J94
♥︎ KJ9♥︎ T6
♦︎7N SOUTH       ♦︎KJ64
♣︎Q75♠︎K2♣︎AT42
7♥︎AQ754326
12HCP9♦︎9525FRK1
12♣︎K7
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
22664by
E
1110769
by
S
22664by
W
1110769
Board 10 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N63 2.504♠︎w+2♣︎T680 1.5038X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N63 2.504♠︎w+2♦︎5680 1.5038X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N63 2.505♠︎w+1♣︎A680 1.5038X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N63 2.504♠︎w+2♥︎9680 1.5038X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N0 0.006♠︎w=♥︎41430 4.00100X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎w9♥︎+1 650
4♠︎w9♥︎+3 710
3Ne6♠︎+4 720
6♠︎w5♦︎= 1430
6♠︎w9♥︎= 1430
6Ne3♦︎+1 1470
East and South pass and West opens 2♣︎. North doubles to indicate a club lead to South, just in case by some miracle South gets in or ends up on opening lead. East makes the positive response of 2♥︎, showing five hearts with two of the top three and eight or more points. South passes and West completes the picture by bidding 2♠︎. East rebids 3♣︎ as a query: if you have a club stopper, notrump might be a good spot. West checks for aces with 4NT, and finding East with none (5♣︎ response), chooses .... 6NT to maximize the score. This may do even better; it is easier for North to cash the A♠︎ against 6♣︎ than 6NT. But West has 12 tricks in the other three suits, 13 if South discards a heart!! 
#10 V  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ 72Dealer: E
♥︎ 94 All Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ J765D  EAST      
♠︎ AKQJ854♣︎ AQT94♠︎ T9
♥︎ A8♥︎ KQT73
♦︎AV SOUTH       ♦︎K84
♣︎K87♠︎63♣︎J32
7♥︎J6523
21HCP9♦︎QT9327FRK2
3♣︎653
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
00064by
E
11101068
by
S
00064by
W
12121079
Board 11 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N100 4.00503NTw–1♥︎3 0.000X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N75 3.004♠︎e+1♥︎A450 1.0025X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N50 2.004♠︎e+2♥︎A480 2.0050X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N25 1.003NTe+3♣︎3490 3.0075X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N0 0.004♠︎e+3♦︎8510 4.00100X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3NwJ♥︎-1 50
4♠︎eA♥︎+2 480
4♠︎eA♥︎+2 480
3Ne6♥︎+4 520
3Ne6♥︎+4 520
6♠︎eA♥︎= 980
South passes and West opens 1♦︎. One mistake newer players make with this type of hand is to open 1♣︎ intending to "reverse" to 2♦︎. This shows the extra values but a reverse also shows MORE (not less or equal) cards in the opened suit than the rebid suit. The way to handle this big hand is to open 1♦︎ and hope to be able to jump to 3♣︎ next. North passes and East responds 1♠︎. South passes and West rebids 3♣︎. East tries 3♥︎, the fourth suit, and when West admits to three-card support for spades with 3♠︎, East supports diamonds with 4♦︎. Now surely these two hands will get to 6♦︎ or 6♠︎ somehow. (Both make easily when West can ruff the second heart.)
#11 N  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ 72Dealer: S
♥︎ JT832 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ J72N  EAST      
♠︎ K98♣︎ T76♠︎ AQT54
♥︎ 7♥︎ Q54
♦︎KQ963D SOUTH       ♦︎AT4
♣︎AKQ2♠︎J63♣︎J8
2♥︎AK962
17HCP13♦︎854FRK2
8♣︎95431
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
00500by
E
111281211
by
S
00500by
W
81271210
Board 12 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N100 4.002♠︎s–1♦︎8100 0.000X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N63 2.502♥︎s–2♦︎6200 1.5038X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N63 2.502♠︎s–2♦︎6200 1.5038X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N25 1.003♥︎s–3♦︎8300 3.0075X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N0 0.004♠︎*s–4♥︎A1100 4.00100X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♦︎e*A♠︎-2 300
2♥︎sA♥︎-1 100
3♣︎n7♥︎-2 200
3Nn7♥︎-2 200
2♠︎sA♥︎-2 200
3♠︎s8♦︎-4 400
West and North pass and East opens 2♦︎. South overcalls 2♠︎ and West passes. North, having passed originally, can bid 3♣︎ without worrying that partner will read too many values into the hand. 3♣︎ becomes the final contract and North's main objective is to hold it to down one, since -100 might be better than -110 if the opponents can make nine tricks in diamonds (they can). West gets off to a fine start, cashing two high hearts and leading a third for East to ruff. Two high trumps and a ruff, plus the AK♥︎ is down one already and the crucial trick for +200 should be the K♦︎, unless declarer can manage to pull trumps and pitch enough diamonds on good spades.
#12 V  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ JDealer: W
♥︎ Q92 NS Vul
D  WEST      ♦︎ Q54N  EAST      
♠︎ 98654♣︎ J87543♠︎ T3
♥︎ AK85♥︎ 74
♦︎86V SOUTH       ♦︎KJT973
♣︎K6♠︎AKQ72♣︎AT2
6♥︎JT635
10HCP8♦︎A23FRK4
16♣︎Q93
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
46747by
E
87696
by
S
45737by
W
87696
Board 13 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N75 3.001003NTw–1♦︎4 1.0025X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N75 3.001001NTw–1♦︎4 1.0025X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N75 3.001004♥︎w–1♠︎K 1.0025X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N25 1.001♠︎w=♦︎480 3.0075X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N0 0.002♥︎w=♦︎J110 4.00100X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎e2♦︎-1 100
4♥︎e4♠︎-1 100
4♥︎e4♥︎-1 100
4♥︎e4♠︎-1 100
3♥︎eT♣︎-1 100
3Nw4♦︎+1 630
North opens 1♦︎ and East passes. South responds 1NT and West looks at 19 points. No overcall seems right, so West makes a takeout double because passing with nearly half the deck seems wrong. North passes, East bids 2♥︎, and South passes. Now what? With an opening bid on West's left and a response on West's right, how much can partner have? West passes, hoping partner has at least five hearts and can survive. Maybe an opponent will come in and West can double for penalties. Or maybe partner's three points are just enough to make eight or nine tricks in hearts, besting all those who could not stop below game. Bridge is about mastering context: sometimes passing with a big hand is the right move!
#13 D  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ KQ85Dealer: N
♥︎ K6 All Vul
V  WEST      ♦︎ JT543V  EAST      
♠︎ AJ62♣︎ Q7♠︎ T97
♥︎ A8♥︎ QJT953
♦︎AQ87V SOUTH       ♦︎9
♣︎KJ3♠︎43♣︎852
11♥︎7423
19HCP3♦︎K621FRK5
7♣︎AT9642
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
64376by
E
77966
by
S
65376by
W
77967
Board 14 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N100 4.001002NTe–2♦︎K 0.000X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N63 2.503NTn–1♣︎250 1.5038X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N63 2.502NTn–1♠︎J50 1.5038X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N25 1.001NTe=♥︎790 3.0075X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N0 0.003♥︎s–2♠︎6100 4.00100X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♠︎w6♥︎-3 150
2♣︎e9♥︎-3 150
2Ne4♣︎-2 100
2Ne4♣︎-1 50
1Ne7♥︎-1 50
3Nn4♥︎-5 250
Surprisinglty, about 10% of all bridge deals have no suit where either side has an eight-card fit, like this one. Usually on these hands the defenders prevail, since it is hard to generate tricks without long suit power. Here, East opens 1♣︎, West responds 1♠︎, East rebids 1NT, and West rebids 2♠︎, down two it goes. But if North or South cannot restrain themselves from competing, they will probably get too high in hearts or diamonds. There is no way to discover that no eight-card fits exist in the bidding: even if you had a system to find out, you'd be too high by the time the answer was yes! So when you first see dummy and all the suits are six or seven-card fits, escaping for down one might be good!
#14 N  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ AK72Dealer: E
♥︎ 6 None Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ J9743D  EAST      
♠︎ QT965♣︎ AJ7♠︎ J8
♥︎ T5♥︎ AKJ4
♦︎A652N SOUTH       ♦︎QT8
♣︎85♠︎43♣︎QT32
13♥︎Q987324
6HCP13♦︎K3FRK1
8♣︎K9646
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
66868by
E
66565
by
S
66867by
W
66565
Board 15 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X2N100 4.001004♥︎e–2♣︎2 0.000X4EVicki Torbett &
Doug MacDougall
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N75 3.00503♥︎e–1♦︎K 1.0025X1EDavid Hsu &
Amanda Hill
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N25 1.003♥︎e=♣︎T140 3.0075X5EMike Bow &
Kelly Anderson
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X4N25 1.001♥︎e+2♦︎7140 3.0075X3EBarbara Spitz &
Marlee Sheinin
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X1N25 1.002♥︎e+1♠︎3140 3.0075X2EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♠︎wK♥︎-2 100
3♥︎e*K♦︎-1 100
3♥︎eK♦︎-1 50
3♥︎e7♦︎-1 50
PASSOUT00
2♥︎e2♣︎+1 140
South and West will pass and it's up to third-seat North and a 10-point hand. 2♦︎ is an option in third seat, where weak twos can be frightfully weak, especially in diamonds. But with North-South vulnerable the better call, if North decides not to pass, might be a light 1♦︎. East will overcall 2♥︎ and South will make a negative double. West will raise to 3♥︎ and this will go down one for an average score. If North passes in third seat, East will pass the hand out with ten points and three spades, thanks to the Cansino/Pearson point system (two inventors on either side of the Atlantic), which says: in fourth seat after three passes, count your points, add your spade length; 14 or less, pass it out!
#15 V  NORTH       Jun. 8, 2026
♠︎ 87Dealer: S
♥︎ KQT NS Vul
N  WEST      ♦︎ T9863N  EAST      
♠︎ K642♣︎ AJ3♠︎ QJ9
♥︎ J96♥︎ A87432
♦︎AJ5D SOUTH       ♦︎42
♣︎Q94♠︎AT53♣︎K6
10♥︎52
11HCP10♦︎KQ70FRK4
9♣︎T87524
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
65578by
E
77865
by
S
65578by
W
77865

Work In Progress! This HTML page with results combines the ACBLscore results, the BridgeMate data, and the actual cards in each hand to make a page that displays nicely on most screens. I'll continue to develop it as I hear about problems from people. So far I have only really had time to test it on the large monitor I have at home. I've done a little bit of work in making it fit on my iPhone 15 screen (turned sideways), but the typical cellphone screen is not wide enough to display the hands alongside the results, so it relocates the hands below the results and you may need to scroll down a bit. The key is in the tabs at the top, which mean you don't need to scroll to get from results to Board 32! Just click or tap on what you want to see next!

Two things that may help: If your browser program is old, some of the tech in this page might not work 100%: the system of tabs at the top of the page requires a recent version. You really aren't doing your computer many favours if you avoid requests to upgrade the programs you use most often, like browsers. If the page works but there are large areas of a monitor unused, you might be able to make it more readable by adjusting the size of things with CTRL + (plus key), which upsizes text and other screen elements a bit. CTRL + (minus key) also works if you go too far, and CTRL + (zero) resets to the default. (This doesn't work on cellphone screens.)

How is a pair's matchpoint score on a board calculated? Your raw score is compared one by one with all of the other raw scores on the board made by pairs sitting in your direction. You get one matchpoint for each score you beat, and a half-point for each score that is the same as yours. The top score on a board is one less than the number of times it is played. If the board was not played as many times as other boards for some reason, the scores may be factored up to compensate, so that each board has the same top score.

How is a pair's total score calculated? The scoring program first checks all boards to see how many times they have been played. Usually this will be the same for all boards, but if there is a sitout or a glitch of some sort in the movement, or an artificially assigned score due to an irregularity, the scoring program must first FACTOR scores on boards played fewer times, so that the top score on every board is the same. Once that is done, the scoring program also checks to see that each pair played the same number of boards: some may have sat out and missed a round: these pairs will have their total matchpoints FACTORED so that they get matchpoints for the boards they missed, based on their percentage on the boards they did play. The total of all this summing and factoring is your final score.

How does this factoring work exactly? There are actually two types of factoring: the most common is to factor a pair's score that has not played as many boards as the other pairs. Their sum of matchpoints on the boards they played, is divided by the number of boards they played, and then multiplied by the number of boards most pairs played. The other type is covered in the next question.

I have the best score on a board but got slightly fewer matchpoints than tops on other boards, why is that? This is the other type of factoring, which happens when a board is played fewer times than other boards for some reason. Maybe a pair didn't get to it, or there was a artificial score assigned after an irregularity. Factoring a board has to take into account the small chance that, had it been played the correct number of times, the extra plays might have produced a score that is better than the current top, or lower than the current bottom. To do so, the ACBL and the World Bridge Federation use the Neuberg formula, which you can read about on Wikipedia if you want the complete details. It has its detractors, but is sort of like Winston Churchill's ranking of democracy as the second-worst system of government ... all the others being tied for first!

HCP and FRK, what on earth are they? HCP stands for highcard points, and the four numbers surrounding it show how many points each player has in a hand. The colour behind the word "HCP" is gray when the 40 points are evenly distributed between North-South and East-West, but turns more and more orange (North-South) or purple (East-West) if one side has a majority. FRK stands for Freakness, a way to describe just how freaky a hand's distribution is, on a scale from 0-20, with average for a hand being just slightly less than 3, and the average for a full deal, the sum of the freakness ratings of the four hands, is about 11.93 on average. A hand gets one freakness point for each card in a suit beyond the fourth, or less than three; plus a bonus if the hand contains at least one void (2 points) or at least one singleton but no void (1 point). The background colour behind the "FRK" shows whether the deal is hot (red), average (gray), or cold (blue) in terms of Freakness! Freakness was created by bridge expert Richard Pavlicek and searching for "pavlicek freakness" will get you quickly to his article on the subject.

Something New! The tabs with the board numbers now indicate which side had the bulk of the high-card points (above the board number: NS: orange, EW: purple, evenly-split: gray), and the freakness rating of the deal as a whole (below the board number: flat: blue, average: gray, freaky: red)! Want to see only the hands where N-S had the points, or the freakiest ones? Check the tabs!

What are "tricks available" and how are they calculated? Computers these days can analyze all the possible legal play lines on a deal, given a trump suit (or notrump) and a declarer, and sort all of these lines into successes and failures to come up with an optimum line of play that perfect defenders and a perfect declarer would take. The result of this line of play is the "tricks available" and is sometimes unrealistic, requiring opening leads that few if any would find, or declarer taking only the finesses that work and dropping offside singleton honours where possible. You will very quickly see from the results which deals have unrealistic "tricks available" expectations, and it is often a fun exercise to work out how you can make that many tricks. But for most deals, it is a fairly good guide as to how high a pair should bid.

Why are the masterpoints not the same as what is on ACBL Live for Clubs? This is in my view an own goal by ACBL: they have new rules for club game masterpoints but are not willing to expend the time to upgrade ACBLscore to show the masterpoints under the new rules. Luckily, most masterpoint awards actually get bigger when they go through the "engine" and are reposted on Live. The main effect is to give more masterpoints to games where the non-sitting out pairs play more boards. The problem is that the masterpoint awards that come out of ACBLscore, before being posted online, are not what you eventually get.

How can I contact McBruce to tell him what's not working for me? By e-mail: oogashawca@gmail.com (the old shaw.ca address is gone)