VanLearners Section X Monday Evening May 25, 2026

Results for Section X, North-South
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X1N 63.10% 53.0010.42Joan Christensen - Carol Linda Ward
X6N 58.33% 49.0020.29Pam Tomlins - Tim Tomlins
X5N 57.74% 48.5030.21Francesco L Piccone - M Piccone
X3N 55.95% 47.00Alexa Allen - Jacquie Brown
X4N 42.86% 36.00Eiler Eis - Bob Hodgkinson
X7N 42.26% 35.50Diane O Connor - Valerie Young
X2N 29.76% 25.00John Fraser - Jandi Fraser
East-West had 50.09% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 13.11, a bit above the average of about 11.93.
Results for Section X, East-West
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X4E 63.69% 53.5010.42Alan Atkins - Vicki Torbett
X6E 52.98% 44.5020.29Curtis Ballard - Elizabeth Ballard
X7E 51.19% 43.0030.21Kelly Anderson - Mike Bow
X3E 47.02% 39.50Doug Stewart - Louise Forsyth
X5E 46.43% 39.00Marcia Smith - Zdenka Buric
X1E 45.24% 38.00Ron Rogers - Patsy Thorpe
X2E 43.45% 36.50Lea Stanlake - Lynne Pomfret
East-West had 50.09% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 13.11, a bit above the average of about 11.93.
Board 1 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N100 6.004303NTs+1♣︎2 0.000X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N83 5.004204♠︎s=♣︎A 1.0017X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N67 4.001802NTs+2♣︎3 2.0033X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N50 3.001703♠︎n+1♦︎A 3.0050X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N33 2.001504♦︎e–3♣︎5 4.0067X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N17 1.00503♦︎e–1♠︎Q 5.0083X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N0 0.004♠︎n–1♦︎A50 6.00100X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎s6♥︎+1 450
4♠︎n9♣︎= 420
4♠︎s9♦︎= 420
3♠︎sT♠︎+2 200
2Ns9♦︎= 120
4♠︎n9♣︎-1 50
North passes and East should too. It's OK for a 2♦︎ opener in every sense except that side four-card major. Opening 2♦︎ with side majors is asking for trouble if partner has a decent hand with that major. South opens 2NT and after West passes, North transfers to spades with a 3♥︎ call. Having AKQx of the suit partner is transferring you to is pretty good, but South's minor suit holdings won't be worth a lot opposite nothing, so South bids 3♠︎ rather than some snazzy super-accept, letting North decide how high to go. North's 3NT call shows exactly five spades, and South corrects to 4♠︎, making ten easy tricks even if the defenders find their club ruff.
#1 D NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ 97432Dealer: E
♥︎ T8 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ Q4N  EAST      
♠︎T5♣︎ KT64♠︎J6
♥︎765♥︎QJ42
♦︎932N SOUTH       ♦︎AJT865
♣︎AQ832♠︎AKQ8♣︎9
5♥︎AK933
6HCP9♦︎K72FRK6
20♣︎J751
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
910969by
E
22464
by
S
910969by
W
22464
Board 2 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N100 6.00505♥︎w–1♠︎7 0.000X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N42 2.504♥︎w=♣︎A420 3.5058X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N42 2.504♥︎w=♣︎A420 3.5058X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N42 2.504♥︎w=♠︎T420 3.5058X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N42 2.504♥︎w=♠︎T420 3.5058X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N42 2.504♥︎w=♣︎8420 3.5058X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N42 2.504♥︎w=♣︎9420 3.5058X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎e9♦︎= 420
4♥︎w2♦︎= 420
4♥︎w7♦︎= 420
4♥︎wA♣︎= 420
4♥︎wA♣︎= 420
4♥︎w9♠︎= 420
Have you ever wondered how some boards result in many different results, yet others show everyone doing the same thing? This is one in the latter category. East opens 1♣︎ (1♦︎ is also OK here, since if the opponents come in and declare and partner is on lead, you'd prefer a diamond lead), South passes, West responds 1♥︎, North passes, East rebids 2♥︎ with the minimum hand and support, and with opening bid values West has no trouble setting 4♥︎ as the contract. As soon as dummy hits, West knows that unless the opponents ruff something, ten or eleven tricks, depending on the location of the K♥︎, will be made: two losers in clubs, no tricks possible elsewhere! Average for everybody!
#2 V NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ T987Dealer: S
♥︎ 8 EW Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ T72D  EAST      
♠︎A32♣︎ AJ982♠︎KQ6
♥︎QJT32♥︎A975
♦︎AJ6V SOUTH       ♦︎KQ4
♣︎Q7♠︎J54♣︎T64
5♥︎K644
14HCP14♦︎98532FRK0
7♣︎K530
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
65356by
E
781077
by
S
65356by
W
781077
Board 3 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N100 6.004204♠︎s=♣︎5 0.000X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N83 5.002302♠︎n+4♥︎Q 1.0017X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N67 4.002002♠︎s+3♦︎J 2.0033X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N42 2.501703♠︎n+1♥︎Q 3.5058X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N42 2.501703♠︎n+1♥︎T 3.5058X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N17 1.001402♠︎s+1♣︎5 5.0083X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N0 0.001202NTs=♣︎5 6.00100X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎s5♣︎+1 450
4♠︎nQ♥︎= 420
2♠︎sJ♦︎+3 200
2♠︎nQ♥︎= 110
2♠︎nQ♥︎= 110
2♥︎s5♣︎-1 50
South opens 1♥︎ as dealer, and after West passes North responds 1♠︎. East passes and South must re-evaluate how strong the South hand is in support of spades. A singleton is worth 3 points with strong support, and the two trump honours are worth an extra point or two, so the 14-count on round one is now worth 18-19 in support of spades. This calls for a jump to 3♠︎ and North has no trouble raising to game. Ten tricks are easy with only two trumps and maybe a club to lose (if the Q♣︎ is with East, it can be finessed!) Without the re-evaluation, can North-South get to game on only 22 combined? A few did not.
#3 N NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ T984Dealer: W
♥︎ 2 Both Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ AK963V  EAST      
♠︎A532♣︎ JT3♠︎K
♥︎K7♥︎QJT84
♦︎JT2D SOUTH       ♦︎Q875
♣︎Q765♠︎QJ76♣︎984
8♥︎A96534
10HCP8♦︎41FRK4
14♣︎AK24
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
710688by
E
62755
by
S
710688by
W
62755
Board 4 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N100 6.002003NTw–2♣︎A 0.000X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N75 4.501002NTw–1♣︎A 1.5025X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N75 4.501003NTw–1♣︎5 1.5025X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N50 3.002♣︎w=♦︎J90 3.0050X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N33 2.002♥︎e=♣︎A110 4.0067X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N8 0.502NTw=♣︎5120 5.5092X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N8 0.502NTw=♣︎5120 5.5092X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3NwA♣︎-2 200
3Nw5♣︎-2 200
3NwA♣︎-2 200
2NwJ♦︎-1 100
2NwA♣︎-1 100
2NwT♥︎-1 100
West opens 3NT with the 25 balanced and everyone passes. If North leads a small club it is over before it begins, with five club tricks to the defenders. Even if North begins with the AK♣︎ and a third club to South's queen, West has only seven top tricks, there is no entry to dummy to cash the rest of the diamonds. If South wins the Q♣︎ and switches to spades, West can finesse for eight tricks but nine is out of the question. One way out might be for East to respond 4♣︎ (Stayman), opting to gamble it out in 4♠︎, or 5♦︎, or perhaps 4♦︎ if partner has no major. That's pretty low-probability but works like a charm on this hand!
#4 V NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ 952Dealer: N
♥︎ T4 NS Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ JT9V  EAST      
♠︎AKJ♣︎ AK854♠︎T843
♥︎AK73♥︎52
♦︎AKQV SOUTH       ♦︎76542
♣︎J97♠︎Q76♣︎T2
8♥︎QJ9862
25HCP0♦︎830FRK3
7♣︎Q632
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
52625by
E
7107117
by
S
53626by
W
7107117
Board 5 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N83 5.001303♦︎s+1♥︎A 1.0017X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N83 5.001302♦︎s+2♥︎A 1.0017X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N83 5.001302♦︎s+2♥︎A 1.0017X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N50 3.005♦︎s–1♥︎Q100 3.0050X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N33 2.003♠︎w=♦︎Q140 4.0067X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N17 1.005♦︎*s–1♠︎J200 5.0083X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N0 0.003♥︎*w=♦︎Q530 6.00100X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♦︎s*T♠︎= 710
3♦︎sJ♠︎+1 130
3♠︎wQ♦︎+1 170
4♦︎sJ♠︎-2 200
3♣︎sA♥︎-4 400
4♠︎wQ♦︎= 420
North and East pass and South opens 1♦︎. West has no convenient call: 1NT lacks a diamond stopper, 1♠︎ lacks a fifth spade, double risks a heart response from East, who will expect West to have more than just two of them. West passes for now and so does North. East decides to get in there with a 1♥︎ call rather than let the auction end in 1♦︎. South counters with the masterstroke, a jump to 4♦︎!! West doubles, which must be for penalties since West passed 1♦︎, and to everyone's surprise, 4♦︎ doubled is unbeatable! South loses only two clubs and a heart, as long as South plays the first diamond to North's singleton queen, ruffs a spade back to hand, and pulls the rest. Easy!
#5 D NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ Q8643Dealer: E
♥︎ J8643 EW Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ QN  EAST      
♠︎KJT9♣︎ 86♠︎A752
♥︎AQ♥︎KT975
♦︎T754V SOUTH       ♦︎6
♣︎AQ9♠︎♣︎754
5♥︎26
16HCP7♦︎AKJ98321FRK4
12♣︎KJT3211
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
433106by
E
910935
by
S
433106by
W
910935
Board 6 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N100 6.001102♠︎s=♥︎T 0.000X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N83 5.002♠︎s–1♣︎350 1.0017X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N58 3.504♠︎s–2♦︎Q100 2.5042X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N58 3.504♠︎s–2♦︎Q100 2.5042X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N25 1.502♥︎e+2♣︎T170 4.5075X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N25 1.502♥︎w+2♠︎2170 4.5075X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N0 0.004♥︎w=♣︎Q620 6.00100X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♠︎sQ♠︎= 110
4♠︎sQ♦︎-1 50
3♠︎s3♣︎-1 50
2♥︎wQ♣︎+1 140
2♥︎w5♠︎+2 170
2♥︎wA♦︎+3 200
East opens 1♦︎, South makes a very weak (not vulnerable, so not completely crazy!) jump overcall of 2♠︎, and West makes a negative double. North, with the best hand at the table, wonders how many points are in this deck before jumping to 4♠︎. It might make, or it might go down while the opponents can make something. This time it's the latter, 4♠︎ is routinely two down: two hearts, a diamond and two clubs to lose; but, East-West can make 4♥︎. None of Section A bid 4♥︎, but several were allowed to play 2♥︎ and made 9-11 tricks, so down two undoubled is not too bad.
#6 N NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ AJ62Dealer: S
♥︎ KJ Both Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ A9642D  EAST      
♠︎Q♣︎ QT♠︎98
♥︎T8543♥︎AQ92
♦︎Q5N SOUTH       ♦︎KT87
♣︎K9732♠︎KT7543♣︎A85
15♥︎763
7HCP13♦︎J36FRK1
5♣︎J644
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
68363by
E
6510710
by
S
68363by
W
6510710
Board 7 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N100 6.001003NTw–1♠︎3 0.000X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N83 5.003♥︎e+1♦︎4170 1.0017X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N42 2.504♥︎e=♠︎3620 3.5058X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N42 2.504♥︎e=♠︎4620 3.5058X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N42 2.504♥︎e=♠︎4620 3.5058X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N42 2.504♥︎e=♠︎K620 3.5058X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N0 0.004♥︎w+1♥︎5650 6.00100X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♥︎eK♠︎+1 170
4♥︎e4♦︎= 620
4♥︎eK♠︎= 620
4♥︎w9♦︎= 620
4♥︎eK♠︎= 620
4♥︎eQ♣︎+1 650
South passes and West opens 1♦︎. North passes and East responds 1♥︎. South passes and West counts 12 highcard point plus one for the club doubleton and one more for the trump honour: 14 in support of hearts, not enough to do any more than a minimum raise to 2♥︎. East has opening bid values and has no trouble setting 4♥︎ as the contract. Two spades and a diamond are the only losers, as long as East does not delay pulling trumps. My very first declaring lesson was "first you think, then you pull trumps." As you play more and more, the hands where thinking prompts you to delay pulling trumps for some reason will become apparent, but most of the time that is task one.
#7 V NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ A983Dealer: W
♥︎ J7 None Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ 9V  EAST      
♠︎JT7♣︎ T87653♠︎62
♥︎A842♥︎KQT93
♦︎QT75D SOUTH       ♦︎AJ3
♣︎AJ♠︎KQ54♣︎K94
5♥︎656
12HCP13♦︎K86421FRK2
10♣︎Q23
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
47347by
E
961096
by
S
47347by
W
961096
Board 8 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N100 6.002004♥︎w–4♠︎5 0.000X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N83 5.001003♦︎w–2♣︎3 1.0017X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N67 4.00503NTw–1♦︎8 2.0033X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N50 3.002♣︎s–1♠︎750 3.0050X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N25 1.503♥︎w=♠︎A140 4.5075X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N25 1.502♥︎w+1♣︎6140 4.5075X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N0 0.003♥︎w+1♠︎A170 6.00100X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♥︎w6♣︎-1 50
3♥︎wA♠︎-1 50
4♥︎wA♠︎-1 50
4♥︎w6♣︎-1 50
3♠︎nA♥︎-2 100
2♠︎nJ♦︎-2 100
Tricky for East-West to avoid getting too high on this one. I would pass the West hand as dealer, and North hasn't a good enough spade suit for a second-seat weak two, so East opens 1♦︎. South overcalls 2♣︎ and West bids 2♥︎, showing at least five. North raises to 3♣︎ and East bids 3♥︎. When South bids 4♣︎, West really should pass. JACK's analysis says that bidding 4♥︎ scores +261 average for East-West, while passing only nets +99 on average, after 1000 simulations. But this means that 4♥︎ is only about 50%, while 4♣︎ is likely down two the majority of the time. I'd pass and take the nearly-sure plus as West, rather than shoot for 420 with even odds. Maybe even a double is best!
#8 N NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ AT6542Dealer: N
♥︎ 3 EW Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ 874N  EAST      
♠︎7♣︎ 643♠︎KQJ8
♥︎KJT42♥︎A95
♦︎KQ32N SOUTH       ♦︎JT65
♣︎Q82♠︎93♣︎97
4♥︎Q8765
11HCP11♦︎A94FRK1
14♣︎AKJT53
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
47447by
E
76975
by
S
47447by
W
76975
Board 9 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N100 6.003002NTe–3♦︎4 0.000X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N75 4.502002NTe–2♦︎4 1.5025X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N75 4.502004♠︎w–2♣︎4 1.5025X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N33 2.001002NTe–1♦︎4 4.0067X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N33 2.001003♠︎w–1♦︎A 4.0067X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N33 2.001002NTe–1♦︎4 4.0067X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N0 0.001NTe=♦︎390 6.00100X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ne4♦︎-4 400
3Ne4♦︎-2 200
3Ne4♦︎-2 200
3Ne4♦︎-1 100
2Ne5♥︎-1 100
3Ne4♦︎= 600
North passes and East opens 1♣︎, intending to rebid 1NT to show 12-14 balanced. South passes and West responds 1♠︎. North passes and East rebids 1NT as planned. When West raises to 2NT, East is happy to bid game with a full 14. Making nine tricks is very difficult. South leads the 4♦︎ to the ten and North's ace, a diamond return from North is ducked but South wins and clears the suit, leaving two winners in the South hand. Now East must keep South off lead and somehow make eight tricks from the other three suits. The only slim chance is to play South for the doubleton Q♣︎ (success, four club tricks!), and then lead the J♠︎ so North must win the third round of spades (success, three spade tricks!).
#9 D NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ T93Dealer: E
♥︎ K983 Both Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ A9V  EAST      
♠︎AK75♣︎ T764♠︎J42
♥︎764♥︎AJ2
♦︎JT6N SOUTH       ♦︎K82
♣︎K85♠︎Q86♣︎AJ92
7♥︎QT51
11HCP14♦︎Q75430FRK0
8♣︎Q32
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
44654by
E
99779
by
S
44654by
W
99779
Board 10 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N100 6.003♥︎w=♠︎4140 0.000X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N83 5.002♥︎w+2♠︎4170 1.0017X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N50 3.002♥︎w+3♠︎3200 3.0050X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N50 3.002♥︎w+3♠︎T200 3.0050X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N50 3.003♥︎w+2♠︎3200 3.0050X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N17 1.004♥︎w=♣︎3620 5.0083X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N0 0.004♥︎w+1♠︎3650 6.00100X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♠︎sA♣︎-1 100
3♥︎w4♦︎+1 170
3♥︎w6♠︎+2 200
2♥︎w6♠︎+3 200
2♠︎sA♥︎-2 200
4♥︎w3♠︎+1 650
East passes and South opens 1♠︎. West has a bit too much for a 2♥︎ overcall, so starts with a double, intending to bid hearts next to show instead a strong heart overcall. North passes and East bids 1NT, which in response to a takeout double shows two things: 8 or more points, and a stopper in opener's suit. The stopper requirement seems reasonable; but why do we need eight points? Because a takeout doubler is not usually interested in notrump, so to suggest it you must have some stuff. South passes and West's 2♠︎ cuebid says "really, an actual stopper?" East 2NT says yes, and West bids 3NT. If South leads a spade it might make ten tricks for a top (4♥︎ makes); a diamond lead holds it to nine.
#10 V NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ T643Dealer: S
♥︎ KT3 None Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ J94D  EAST      
♠︎K♣︎ 853♠︎QJ7
♥︎AQJ986♥︎42
♦︎85V SOUTH       ♦︎AT763
♣︎AKJ7♠︎A9852♣︎642
4♥︎750
18HCP7♦︎KQ26FRK2
11♣︎QT92
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
36242by
E
9710910
by
S
36242by
W
9710910
Board 11 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N100 6.001502♠︎w–3♦︎9 0.000X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N75 4.501102♣︎s+1♠︎K 1.5025X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N75 4.501102♣︎s+1♠︎9 1.5025X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N50 3.00701♦︎s=♠︎K 3.0050X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N33 2.003♣︎s–1♠︎K50 4.0067X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N17 1.001NTe=♣︎690 5.0083X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N0 0.001NTe+2♦︎2150 6.00100X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♣︎sK♠︎= 110
2♣︎s2♥︎+1 110
2♣︎sJ♣︎+1 110
3♣︎sK♠︎-1 50
2♦︎eA♥︎+1 110
2Ne6♣︎+1 150
South needs to be careful and open the weaker, higher five-card suit: 1♦︎, not 1♣︎. Either way, West overcalls 1♠︎ and after North passes, East bids 1NT. Wouldn't you prefer to be able to rebid 2♣︎ now, so partner with a weak hand can correct to 2♦︎ or just pass 2♣︎; rather than opening 1♣︎ because it is the better suit, and now having to rebid 2♣︎ with only five, or rebid 2♦︎, forcing partner to the three level to prefer clubs? Care in foreseeing rebid problems like this is a sign of a good player. 2♣︎ makes three, but on another day the K♣︎ or even the KJx♣︎ might be offside, and if you'd opened 1♣︎ and then rebid 2♦︎, forcing partner to 3♣︎, you'd be needlessly down one.
#11 N NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ J643Dealer: W
♥︎ QJ863 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ 9N  EAST      
♠︎KQT95♣︎ 543♠︎A8
♥︎K72♥︎T954
♦︎Q75D SOUTH       ♦︎KJT4
♣︎J7♠︎72♣︎K98
4♥︎A4
11HCP11♦︎A86322FRK1
14♣︎AQT626
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
65769by
E
75574
by
S
45759by
W
75574
Board 12 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N100 6.0013906♣︎s+1♠︎6 0.000X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N42 2.506204♠︎n=♦︎A 3.5058X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N42 2.506204♠︎n=♦︎A 3.5058X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N42 2.506204♠︎n=♦︎A 3.5058X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N42 2.506204♠︎n=♦︎A 3.5058X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N42 2.506204♠︎n=♦︎Q 3.5058X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N42 2.506204♠︎n=♦︎A 3.5058X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ns6♥︎+4 720
4♠︎nA♦︎+2 680
4♠︎nA♦︎= 620
4♠︎nK♦︎= 620
4♠︎nA♦︎= 620
4♠︎nA♦︎= 620
East-West pass throughout on this one and it begins with North's 1♠︎ opener in second seat. South responds 2♣︎, which in standard can be as few as 10 points, but in more modern systems is natural and game forcing. When I learned bridge and some were still using four-card majors (!) a big question was whether this 2♣︎ rebid promised another bid. Today we think that the only passable rebid from opener is 2NT: South promises another call after any other rebid by North: 2♠︎, or 2♦︎ here, both forcing. The normal contract will be 4♠︎ and defenders will get three diamond tricks only, but if North rebids 2♦︎ and South tries 3NT, a non-diamond lead from poor West allows South to make 13 tricks! 
#12 V NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ AQJT32Dealer: N
♥︎ A5 Both Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ 9876N  EAST      
♠︎65♣︎ 3♠︎984
♥︎JT7643♥︎K98
♦︎JTV SOUTH       ♦︎AKQ3
♣︎J72♠︎K7♣︎T94
11♥︎Q26
3HCP12♦︎5424FRK0
14♣︎AKQ8654
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
910589by
E
00650
by
S
910579by
W
00650
Board 13 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N92 5.506003NTs=♥︎9 0.508X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N92 5.506003NTs=♥︎Q 0.508X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N67 4.003003♥︎w–3♣︎A 2.0033X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N42 2.501303♣︎n+1♥︎2 3.5058X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N42 2.501303♣︎s+1♥︎Q 3.5058X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N17 1.001002♥︎w–1♦︎T 5.0083X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N0 0.001♥︎w=♦︎380 6.00100X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3NsQ♥︎+2 660
3NsQ♥︎+1 630
3NsQ♥︎+1 630
3♦︎s2♣︎+1 130
4♣︎n3♥︎= 130
3♣︎n7♠︎+1 130
North opens 1♣︎ and East passes. South bids 2NT, which in standard is forcing to game (usually 13-15) and denies a four-card major. This is quite different from modern systems where the 2NT response to 1♣︎ or 1♦︎ shows 10-12 and invites game only. Players with 13 or more will either bid 3NT or respond 1♦︎ with four or more to see if partner can raise diamonds (which seldom happens....). Anyhow, with South promising at least 13 points, North has no trouble bidding 3NT with 11 and a decent five-card suit. This is passed out and West leads the Q♥︎. South wins in hand and runs the J♣︎ to East's queen, setting up four clubs, two hearts, a spade, and two diamonds, maybe three if West pitches a diamond on clubs.
#13 D NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ A5Dealer: E
♥︎ 876 None Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ T73V  EAST      
♠︎QJ82♣︎ AKT65♠︎K974
♥︎QJT954♥︎32
♦︎Q8V SOUTH       ♦︎J654
♣︎2♠︎T63♣︎Q74
11♥︎AK2
8HCP6♦︎AK926FRK1
15♣︎J9831
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
9771010by
E
46632
by
S
9771010by
W
46632
Board 14 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X1N100 6.004204♠︎s=♦︎4 0.000X2ELea Stanlake &
Lynne Pomfret
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X7N83 5.001402♠︎s+1♣︎3 1.0017X7EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X3N67 4.001005♣︎w–2♠︎A 2.0033X6ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X5N33 2.004♠︎s–1♥︎A50 4.0067X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Pam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
X6N33 2.004♠︎n–1♣︎650 4.0067X5EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X4N33 2.004♠︎s–1♣︎Q50 4.0067X1ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
John Fraser &
Jandi Fraser
X2N0 0.004♠︎s–2♣︎6100 6.00100X4EAlan Atkins &
Vicki Torbett
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎sQ♣︎+1 450
3♠︎sJ♦︎+1 170
3♠︎sQ♣︎= 140
5♣︎w*A♠︎-1 100
5♠︎sA♥︎-1 50
4♠︎s6♣︎-2 100
East passes and South opens 1♠︎. West overcalls 2♣︎ and North has a fine hand in support of spades, worth about 13 points. To keep the bidding low in case South has a big hand worth exploring, North cuebids 3♣︎ to confirm spade support and force to game. East passes and South sees an aceless minimum, so 4♠︎ is the obvious call. (3♠︎ would show a better hand, while denying the A♥︎ or A♦︎ since those could be cuebid at the three level.) South wins the club lead in hand and leads a spade to dummy's ace, West showing out. South can finesse twice, using the A♣︎ as an entry, pull East's last trump and knock out the A♥︎, but now East-West can cash three diamonds for down one before South can ruff with the last trump.
#14 N NORTH       May. 25, 2026
♠︎ A532Dealer: S
♥︎ QT642 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ 73D  EAST      
♠︎♣︎ AT♠︎QT76
♥︎A87♥︎53
♦︎KJT4N SOUTH       ♦︎A865
♣︎QJ7642♠︎KJ984♣︎853
10♥︎KJ93
11HCP6♦︎Q927FRK1
13♣︎K92
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
89853by
E
544710
by
S
89953by
W
544710

Work In Progress! This HTML page with results combines the ACBLscore results, the BridgeMate data, and the actual cards in each hand to make a page that displays nicely on most screens. I'll continue to develop it as I hear about problems from people. So far I have only really had time to test it on the large monitor I have at home. I've done a little bit of work in making it fit on my iPhone 15 screen (turned sideways), but the typical cellphone screen is not wide enough to display the hands alongside the results, so it relocates the hands below the results and you may need to scroll down a bit. The key is in the tabs at the top, which mean you don't need to scroll to get from results to Board 32! Just click or tap on what you want to see next!

Two things that may help: If your browser program is old, some of the tech in this page might not work 100%: the system of tabs at the top of the page requires a recent version. You really aren't doing your computer many favours if you avoid requests to upgrade the programs you use most often, like browsers. If the page works but there are large areas of a monitor unused, you might be able to make it more readable by adjusting the size of things with CTRL + (plus key), which upsizes text and other screen elements a bit. CTRL + (minus key) also works if you go too far, and CTRL + (zero) resets to the default. (This doesn't work on cellphone screens.)

How is a pair's matchpoint score on a board calculated? Your raw score is compared one by one with all of the other raw scores on the board made by pairs sitting in your direction. You get one matchpoint for each score you beat, and a half-point for each score that is the same as yours. The top score on a board is one less than the number of times it is played. If the board was not played as many times as other boards for some reason, the scores may be factored up to compensate, so that each board has the same top score.

How is a pair's total score calculated? The scoring program first checks all boards to see how many times they have been played. Usually this will be the same for all boards, but if there is a sitout or a glitch of some sort in the movement, or an artificially assigned score due to an irregularity, the scoring program must first FACTOR scores on boards played fewer times, so that the top score on every board is the same. Once that is done, the scoring program also checks to see that each pair played the same number of boards: some may have sat out and missed a round: these pairs will have their total matchpoints FACTORED so that they get matchpoints for the boards they missed, based on their percentage on the boards they did play. The total of all this summing and factoring is your final score.

How does this factoring work exactly? There are actually two types of factoring: the most common is to factor a pair's score that has not played as many boards as the other pairs. Their sum of matchpoints on the boards they played, is divided by the number of boards they played, and then multiplied by the number of boards most pairs played. The other type is covered in the next question.

I have the best score on a board but got slightly fewer matchpoints than tops on other boards, why is that? This is the other type of factoring, which happens when a board is played fewer times than other boards for some reason. Maybe a pair didn't get to it, or there was a artificial score assigned after an irregularity. Factoring a board has to take into account the small chance that, had it been played the correct number of times, the extra plays might have produced a score that is better than the current top, or lower than the current bottom. To do so, the ACBL and the World Bridge Federation use the Neuberg formula, which you can read about on Wikipedia if you want the complete details. It has its detractors, but is sort of like Winston Churchill's ranking of democracy as the second-worst system of government ... all the others being tied for first!

HCP and FRK, what on earth are they? HCP stands for highcard points, and the four numbers surrounding it show how many points each player has in a hand. The colour behind the word "HCP" is gray when the 40 points are evenly distributed between North-South and East-West, but turns more and more orange (North-South) or purple (East-West) if one side has a majority. FRK stands for Freakness, a way to describe just how freaky a hand's distribution is, on a scale from 0-20, with average for a hand being just slightly less than 3, and the average for a full deal, the sum of the freakness ratings of the four hands, is about 11.93 on average. A hand gets one freakness point for each card in a suit beyond the fourth, or less than three; plus a bonus if the hand contains at least one void (2 points) or at least one singleton but no void (1 point). The background colour behind the "FRK" shows whether the deal is hot (red), average (gray), or cold (blue) in terms of Freakness! Freakness was created by bridge expert Richard Pavlicek and searching for "pavlicek freakness" will get you quickly to his article on the subject.

Something New! The tabs with the board numbers now indicate which side had the bulk of the high-card points (above the board number: NS: orange, EW: purple, evenly-split: gray), and the freakness rating of the deal as a whole (below the board number: flat: blue, average: gray, freaky: red)! Want to see only the hands where N-S had the points, or the freakiest ones? Check the tabs!

What are "tricks available" and how are they calculated? Computers these days can analyze all the possible legal play lines on a deal, given a trump suit (or notrump) and a declarer, and sort all of these lines into successes and failures to come up with an optimum line of play that perfect defenders and a perfect declarer would take. The result of this line of play is the "tricks available" and is sometimes unrealistic, requiring opening leads that few if any would find, or declarer taking only the finesses that work and dropping offside singleton honours where possible. You will very quickly see from the results which deals have unrealistic "tricks available" expectations, and it is often a fun exercise to work out how you can make that many tricks. But for most deals, it is a fairly good guide as to how high a pair should bid.

Why are the masterpoints not the same as what is on ACBL Live for Clubs? This is in my view an own goal by ACBL: they have new rules for club game masterpoints but are not willing to expend the time to upgrade ACBLscore to show the masterpoints under the new rules. Luckily, most masterpoint awards actually get bigger when they go through the "engine" and are reposted on Live. The main effect is to give more masterpoints to games where the non-sitting out pairs play more boards. The problem is that the masterpoint awards that come out of ACBLscore, before being posted online, are not what you eventually get.

How can I contact McBruce to tell him what's not working for me? By e-mail: oogashawca@gmail.com (the old shaw.ca address is gone)