VanLearners Section X Monday Evening April 13, 2026

Results for Section X, North-South
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X2N 58.33% 35.0010.30Jill Price - Barbara Spitz
X3N 55.00% 33.0020.21Eiler Eis - Bob Hodgkinson
X1N 47.50% 28.50Amanda Hill - David Hsu
X5N 47.50% 28.50Diane O Connor - Valerie Young
X4N 41.67% 25.00Joan Christensen - Judy Day
East-West had 50.54% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 10.71, a bit below the average of about 11.93.
Results for Section X, East-West
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X5E 61.67% 37.0010.30Myrna Halpenny - Vicki Torbett
X3E 59.17% 35.5020.21Francesco L Piccone - M Piccone
X2E 47.50% 28.50Doug MacDougall - Niamh Kelly
X4E 41.67% 25.00Pam Tomlins - Tim Tomlins
X1E 40.00% 24.00Alan Atkins - David Rosenberg
East-West had 50.54% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 10.71, a bit below the average of about 11.93.
Board 1 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N100 4.001702♥︎s+2♠︎A 0.000X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N75 3.001403♠︎s=♣︎3 1.0025X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N25 1.004♥︎s–1♠︎250 3.0075X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N25 1.003NTs–1♣︎350 3.0075X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N25 1.004♠︎n–1♥︎A50 3.0075X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎s3♣︎= 420
1Nn5♦︎+3 180
2♥︎s2♣︎+2 170
3♥︎s3♦︎+1 170
2♥︎s3♦︎+2 170
2♥︎s3♣︎+1 140
North and East pass and South opens 1♥︎ in third chair. West passes and North wants to know whether South has a real opener or a light third seat kind. 2♣︎ is the Drury convention, an artificial ask that always promises reasonable trump support and limit raise values. This becomes important when East gets into the auction with a 2♦︎ overcall. South has a full 14 with two doubletons and has no trouble bidding 4♥︎, which makes unless the defenders manage to get a spade ruff. Doug Drury's original idea for survival when facing crazy third seat open-anything partners has advanced in the 60 years since, and promising support and at least 10-11 points is a must have feature. 
#1 D NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ J965Dealer: E
♥︎ T85 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ KJ7N  EAST      
♠︎AT32♣︎ AJ7♠︎8
♥︎97♥︎AK4
♦︎T43N SOUTH       ♦︎Q8652
♣︎K543♠︎KQ74♣︎T982
10♥︎QJ6320
7HCP9♦︎A91FRK4
14♣︎Q63
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
89966by
E
34476
by
S
89966by
W
34476
Board 2 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N100 4.001102♥︎s=♠︎5 0.000X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N63 2.501001NTe–2♥︎8 1.5038X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N63 2.501003NTe–2♥︎3 1.5038X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N25 1.001NTe+1♥︎8120 3.0075X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N0 0.003♣︎n–3♥︎A300 4.00100X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♥︎sJ♣︎+1 140
2♥︎n2♦︎= 110
2♣︎nK♥︎+1 110
2♥︎s4♠︎= 110
2♠︎w2♥︎-2 100
2♥︎s5♠︎-1 100
East opens 1NT and South's 2♥︎ overcall may look a bit light, but the advantage is that defending notrump, South needs to get in at least twice to establish the suit and run it; playing in hearts there are extra entries available by ruffing. Everyone passes 2♥︎ and partner's three aces may seem like the greatest luck in the world for South and that awful overcall, but give East-West any one of those aces and they make 1NT without trouble, possibly more. Decent six-card suits should not let the 1NT opener have free rein! Bid and avoid having to defend 1NT. If you think playing 1NT is hard, defending it is much harder!
#2 V NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ A94Dealer: S
♥︎ 2 EW Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ A963D  EAST      
♠︎Q875♣︎ A8753♠︎KJ3
♥︎74♥︎AKT3
♦︎J754V SOUTH       ♦︎K82
♣︎JT6♠︎T62♣︎Q42
12♥︎QJ98654
4HCP16♦︎QT1FRK0
8♣︎K94
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
66877by
E
66566
by
S
66877by
W
66566
Board 3 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N75 3.003♠︎e+1♣︎5170 1.0025X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N75 3.002♠︎e+2♣︎A170 1.0025X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N75 3.002♠︎e+2♣︎A170 1.0025X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N25 1.002NTe+2♣︎A180 3.0075X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N0 0.004♠︎e=♦︎7620 4.00100X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ne8♥︎-1 100
3Ne6♥︎-1 100
2Ne4♣︎= 120
2Nw3♥︎= 120
3Ne7♦︎= 600
3Ne7♦︎+1 630
Three passes to East who opens 1♠︎. 1NT is within range but 5-2 in the majors is not a good 1NT bid: partner always seems to transfer you into the wrong major and you play 2♥︎ with a 5-2 fit while ogling partner's three spades and wishing you were in spades. On a good day you'll go as far as ruffing something with a spade and leading out of turn before discovering that you've let your wishes become reality! Over 1♠︎, West responds 1NT, and East raises to 3NT. Even a 6-count should have a shot at game with a spade suit this good and a smattering of help elsewhere. West has to lose a spade but four spades and three hearts leave two to establish in the minors, difficult but possible.
#3 N NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ J3Dealer: W
♥︎ J973 Both Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ AT4V  EAST      
♠︎84♣︎ QT64♠︎AKQ96
♥︎AK52♥︎Q4
♦︎K953D SOUTH       ♦︎Q62
♣︎732♠︎T752♣︎KJ8
8♥︎T861
10HCP17♦︎J871FRK2
5♣︎A950
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
44545by
E
89898
by
S
44535by
W
89898
Board 4 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N97 3.886303NTs+1♦︎3 0.123X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N66 2.626003NTn=♥︎5 1.3834X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N19 0.753NTn–1♥︎5100 3.2581X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N19 0.754♠︎n–1♣︎J100 3.2581X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎nJ♣︎= 620
3Nn5♥︎= 600
3Nn8♥︎= 600
2Nn5♥︎= 120
4♠︎n5♥︎-1 100
4♠︎n2♥︎-1 100
West passes and North opens 2NT. East passes and South makes a Stayman 3♣︎ call, asking about majors. West passes and North confirms a four-card major with 3♠︎. Who can blame South for raising to 4♠︎? It seems the best spot, but there are two diamonds and a club to lose, leaving it all up to the location of the Q♠︎, which is unfavourable. At least 4♠︎ should have been better than 3NT, as long as East worked out from the opening heart lead that there was no future in the suit and switched to diamonds when in with the Q♠︎. The ace and then the jack gets five tricks for the defenders in diamonds alone!
#4 V NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ AKT5Dealer: N
♥︎ AQ6 NS Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ T7V  EAST      
♠︎84♣︎ AK87♠︎Q76
♥︎J42♥︎T8753
♦︎K9632V SOUTH       ♦︎AJ4
♣︎QT2♠︎J932♣︎J9
20♥︎K91
6HCP8♦︎Q852FRK2
6♣︎65431
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
79779by
E
64664
by
S
79779by
W
64664
Board 5 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N75 3.007505♣︎*n=♦︎A 1.0025X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N75 3.007505♣︎*n=♠︎A 1.0025X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N75 3.007505♣︎*n=♥︎A 1.0025X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N25 1.006005♣︎n=♦︎A 3.0075X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N0 0.003♥︎e+1♣︎A170 4.00100X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♣︎n*A♥︎= 750
5♣︎n*A♠︎= 750
5♣︎nA♦︎= 600
3♣︎n8♣︎+2 150
4♣︎nA♥︎+1 150
4♥︎eA♣︎-1 50
North opens 1♣︎ and East makes a textbook takeout double: for once East has 4-4-4-1 with support for all unbid suits. South passes and West responds 1♥︎. But then North rebids ... FIVE clubs! The one thing East must not do is double for penalties. There are some hands where North has enough for a 5♣︎ rebid with only one ace, where all three of East's aces will cash, but the vast majority of the time at least one of them will not. And on those occasions you will almost always find that the aces you cashed before one got ruffed set up a king or even a king-queen in declarer's hand. If you must double, lead the 8♣︎ and wait for your tricks.
#5 D NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ KQ5Dealer: E
♥︎ K8 EW Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ N  EAST      
♠︎JT43♣︎ AKJT7652♠︎A976
♥︎QT976♥︎A532
♦︎J82V SOUTH       ♦︎AQT3
♣︎Q♠︎82♣︎8
16♥︎J410
6HCP14♦︎K976544FRK3
4♣︎9434
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
944610by
E
49973
by
S
944610by
W
49973
Board 6 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N100 4.003004♦︎e–3♣︎A 0.000X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N75 3.002♥︎s–1♠︎A50 1.0025X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N38 1.502♥︎s–2♣︎5100 2.5063X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N38 1.503♥︎s–2♣︎5100 2.5063X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N0 0.004♠︎n–3♣︎K150 4.00100X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♣︎wK♠︎-2 200
2♠︎n3♣︎+1 140
3NwK♠︎-1 100
2♥︎s5♣︎-1 50
2♥︎s4♣︎-2 100
3Ne5♥︎+2 660
East passes and South opens a weak 2♥︎. West doubles, North passes, and East responds 2NT. South passes and West bids 3♣︎. North passes and East bids 3NT. This is passed out but South on opening lead wants to know why every bid after the takeout double was alerted. 2NT, explains East, was a relay to 3♣︎, which West can override only with a very long other suit. West's 3♣︎ was virtually forced and might have fewer clubs than expected. East's 3NT showed a stopper in hearts and denied four spades. "Thanks", says South, trying a spade lead, which holds East to nine tricks. Alerts are for your benefit: ask and listen; often they will help you avoid a bad lead (hearts costs a trick). 
#6 N NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ KQJ94Dealer: S
♥︎ T8 Both Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ T864D  EAST      
♠︎A63♣︎ J2♠︎T2
♥︎A2♥︎Q97
♦︎K72N SOUTH       ♦︎AJ53
♣︎Q9754♠︎875♣︎KT63
7♥︎KJ65433
13HCP10♦︎Q92FRK1
10♣︎A84
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
47743by
E
966910
by
S
47743by
W
966910
Board 7 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N88 3.506204♠︎n=♥︎A 0.5013X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N88 3.506204♠︎n=♥︎A 0.5013X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N38 1.501703♠︎n+1♥︎J 2.5063X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N38 1.501702♠︎n+2♦︎8 2.5063X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N0 0.001403♠︎n=♥︎9 4.00100X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎s4♦︎= 620
4♠︎nA♥︎= 620
3♠︎nA♥︎+1 170
2♠︎s6♥︎+1 140
2♠︎n8♦︎+1 140
2♥︎eA♦︎= 110
South opens 1♣︎ and West passes. North responds 1♠︎ and East overcalls 2♥︎. South jumps to 3♠︎ and after West passes, North thinks a bit and then bids 4♠︎, and this is the final contract. East is on lead. North's pause for thought might mean this is close, or it might mean North was considering 3NT. Either way, the A♥︎ opening lead is a giveaway; if it's close or 3NT is an option, partner may get in to lead them through declarer's K♥︎ and leading the ace will cost a trick. Better to start with a diamond, hoping for a ruff, or a club, hoping to get partner in to lead hearts. Opening leads don't always have to be from your strongest suit!
#7 V NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ Q974Dealer: W
♥︎ K7 None Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ KJ92V  EAST      
♠︎53♣︎ J76♠︎A82
♥︎6543♥︎AQJT9
♦︎Q764D SOUTH       ♦︎83
♣︎K92♠︎KJT6♣︎854
10♥︎821
5HCP11♦︎AT51FRK2
14♣︎AQT31
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
69588by
E
53854
by
S
69588by
W
53854
Board 8 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N100 4.004♠︎w=♣︎Q420 0.000X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N63 2.503NTe+1♦︎J430 1.5038X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N63 2.503NTe+1♥︎3430 1.5038X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N25 1.003NTw+2♣︎6460 3.0075X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N0 0.004♠︎w+2♣︎Q480 4.00100X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎w3♠︎-1 50
2♠︎wJ♥︎+3 200
3Ne5♦︎= 400
4♠︎wJ♥︎+1 450
3Ne9♥︎+2 460
3Ne5♦︎+2 460
5-5 in the blacks used to be debated, but with most now open 1♠︎ on these hands, whatever the strength. Here East will respond 1NT and West jump rebids 3♣︎ to show a strong two-suiter, passing when partner chooses 3NT. If West instead opens 1♣︎, East responds 1♥︎ and West's 2♠︎ jump will get the point across, but the vital information that West has five spades, clear enough on the first auction, is less certain here; West could have only four. If East had three spades, the fit might be missed. If South leads the 5♦︎ against 3NT to East's queen and East finesses to the Q♣︎, North needs to be brilliant and lead the saved TEN♦︎ for three tricks: otherwise East ducks, South wins, and East gets one more.
#8 N NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ 643Dealer: N
♥︎ JT64 EW Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ T876N  EAST      
♠︎AQ987♣︎ Q6♠︎K2
♥︎AK♥︎Q752
♦︎4N SOUTH       ♦︎KQ32
♣︎KJ852♠︎JT5♣︎T74
3♥︎9831
17HCP10♦︎AJ956FRK1
10♣︎A930
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
32342by
E
10119810
by
S
32352by
W
9109810
Board 9 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N100 4.001801NTn+3♥︎6 0.000X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N75 3.001502NTn+1♥︎6 1.0025X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N50 2.001202NTn=♠︎Q 2.0050X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N13 0.503NTn–2♠︎Q100 3.5088X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N13 0.504♥︎*s–1♠︎4100 3.5088X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nn6♥︎= 400
2Nn2♦︎+1 150
2Nn6♥︎+1 150
1Nn9♥︎+1 120
2NnQ♠︎-1 50
3NnQ♠︎-1 50
North opens 1♦︎ intending to rebid 2NT with the 18-count. East passes and South responds 1♥︎. West overcalls 1♠︎ and North chooses the 2NT rebid anyhow. East passes and South bids 3♣︎ in search of a safe fit. West passes and North tries 3NT, which seems a bit reckless to me, but in clubs North would need ten tricks to outscore those in 2NT and eleven to tie those in 2NT making three. So maybe 3NT is the best shot. East leads the Q♠︎ and another, South winning the second. Three hearts ending in dummy and the club finesse to East's Q♣︎ leaves East without a spade to lead, but after cashing two hearts East leads a club and South has the rest, with the T♣︎ as an entry to take the diamond finesse! 
#9 D NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ AT7Dealer: E
♥︎ K4 Both Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ AQT9V  EAST      
♠︎KJ943♣︎ AJ32♠︎Q2
♥︎T5♥︎J9763
♦︎K875N SOUTH       ♦︎J62
♣︎K7♠︎865♣︎Q84
18♥︎AQ821
10HCP6♦︎433FRK2
6♣︎T9651
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
989810by
E
45452
by
S
989810by
W
45453
Board 10 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N100 4.002003♦︎e–2♣︎A 0.000X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N63 2.501001NTe–1♣︎A 1.5038X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N63 2.501001NTe–1♣︎A 1.5038X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N25 1.003♣︎s–1♦︎2100 3.0075X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N0 0.002♦︎e+1♣︎A110 4.00100X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1NeA♣︎-2 200
1NeT♣︎-2 200
2♦︎e5♦︎-1 100
2♦︎eA♣︎-1 100
3♣︎s2♦︎-1 100
3♣︎sQ♦︎-1 100
East opens 1NT and at two tables that was the only bid. South begins with the A♣︎ and Q♣︎ and waits for the A♠︎ and four more clubs; North's A♦︎ is the seventh trick for the defenders, who may get more if they can lead spades through East's ♠︎Kx. At the other tables South overcalled 2♣︎ or 3♣︎, and some East competed to 2♦︎ when the overcall was 2♣︎ only. The South hand is good enough for a jump to 3♣︎ here, I think. But in terms of tricks available, nothing biddable on normal lines is making on this layout, 3♣︎ and 2♦︎ both fail by a trick. Sometimes the right bid is a little too much!
#10 V NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ QJ63Dealer: S
♥︎ 75432 None Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ A93D  EAST      
♠︎T942♣︎ 7♠︎K5
♥︎K9♥︎AQJ
♦︎QJ62V SOUTH       ♦︎KT874
♣︎843♠︎A87♣︎K65
7♥︎T864
6HCP16♦︎51FRK2
11♣︎AQJT925
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
58958by
E
55475
by
S
58958by
W
55475
Board 11 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N88 3.501403♥︎n=♦︎A 0.5013X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N88 3.501401♥︎n+2♦︎A 0.5013X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N38 1.501303♣︎n+1♦︎A 2.5063X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N38 1.501303♣︎n+1♠︎J 2.5063X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N0 0.00801♠︎n=♣︎5 4.00100X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♣︎nA♦︎+2 150
2♣︎nT♥︎+3 150
3♣︎nT♥︎+2 150
3♠︎e3♣︎-2 100
3♠︎e3♣︎-2 100
3Nn5♠︎-1 50
South and West pass and North opens 1♣︎. East overcalls 1♠︎ and South responds 2♣︎. West passes and North raises to 3♣︎. East passes and you can almost feel in the air the North-South pair seeking a spade stopper to have an excuse to bid 3NT. South finally passes and West decides to raise to 3♠︎. It might make, or it might go down less than the value of North-Souths's club contract, or it might induce one of them to try 3NT. North passes and East does too and South bids 4♣︎. This ends the auction and the defenders get two spades and a diamond unless they are silly enough to lead the A♦︎ or T♥︎ as Section A somehow did, allowing North to make eleven tricks!
#11 N NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ Q7Dealer: W
♥︎ AKQ5 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ 652N  EAST      
♠︎KT42♣︎ AKT2♠︎AJ853
♥︎J62♥︎T983
♦︎JT8D SOUTH       ♦︎A4
♣︎754♠︎96♣︎J9
18♥︎741
5HCP10♦︎KQ9730FRK3
7♣︎Q8633
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
7691010by
E
57422
by
S
7691010by
W
57422
Board 12 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N100 4.006303NTs+1♥︎3 0.000X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N75 3.006204♠︎s=♣︎2 1.0025X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N25 1.001702♠︎s+2♣︎2 3.0075X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N25 1.001702♠︎s+2♣︎2 3.0075X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N25 1.001702♠︎s+2♥︎3 3.0075X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎s9♣︎= 620
4♠︎s3♥︎= 620
4♠︎s2♣︎= 620
2♠︎s3♥︎+2 170
2♠︎s2♣︎+2 170
3♦︎n2♠︎= 110
RONF used to be seen on many convention cards in the weak two area, spanning the space between 2♦︎ and 2♠︎. It stands for ♥︎R♠︎aise ♥︎O♠︎nly ♥︎N♠︎on ♥︎F♠︎orce, meaning that any bid other than a raise of the weak two by partner is forcing. Here West passes and North opens a weak 2♦︎. East passes and South bids 2♠︎. 100% forcing unless South has previously passed. North rebids 3♦︎, South 3♠︎ to confirm a six-card suit, and North raises to 4♠︎ voluntarily, with a good suit and two-card support. Tough to beat this one, but possible if defenders remove two rounds of trumps early on. South now cannot ruff the third round of hearts and may lose the fourth, along with the three aces East-West have.
#12 V NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ J2Dealer: N
♥︎ J2 Both Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ AQJT83N  EAST      
♠︎A5♣︎ 863♠︎T64
♥︎T743♥︎A98
♦︎K52V SOUTH       ♦︎9764
♣︎J952♠︎KQ9873♣︎AT4
9♥︎KQ654
8HCP8♦︎1FRK0
15♣︎KQ77
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
99898by
E
44445
by
S
99897by
W
43445
Board 13 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N100 4.003003♠︎w–3♦︎A 0.000X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N75 3.002002NTw–2♦︎6 1.0025X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N50 2.001102♦︎n+1♥︎2 2.0050X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N13 0.501♠︎w=♥︎680 3.5088X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N13 0.501♥︎e=♠︎380 3.5088X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♥︎e*3♠︎-2 500
1NsA♥︎+1 120
2NsA♥︎= 120
1Ns7♣︎+1 120
2♦︎s5♠︎+1 110
3♦︎n4♥︎-1 100
North opens 1♦︎ and East might overcall 1♥︎ if there is a light blinding him to the vulnerability. East should pass and South will respond 1NT. West isn't coming in at the two level with only 12 and no long suit, so 1NT it is, and with the points divided 20-20 it should be a good battle. West leads the T♠︎, won by South's king, and a finesse loses to East's Q♦︎. East attacks hearts with a small one to West's ace and another back, but South has two stoppers, and a second diamond finesse to East's king gets a heart back, clearing the suit, but East has no further entry and South makes eight tricks, two in each suit, for a good score.
#13 D NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ Q84Dealer: E
♥︎ 76 None Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ AT62V  EAST      
♠︎AT92♣︎ AQ62♠︎J75
♥︎A5♥︎Q98432
♦︎943V SOUTH       ♦︎KQ
♣︎KJ97♠︎K63♣︎54
12♥︎KJT1
12HCP8♦︎J8751FRK4
8♣︎T830
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
86687by
E
47745
by
S
86698by
W
47745
Board 14 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N100 4.001402♥︎n+1♠︎8 0.000X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N75 3.001201NTn+1♠︎8 1.0025X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N50 2.001♠︎w+1♣︎4110 2.0050X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N25 1.002♠︎w+1♣︎4140 3.0075X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N0 0.003♥︎s–3♣︎A150 4.00100X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♠︎w6♥︎-1 50
3♠︎w6♥︎-1 50
1Ns3♠︎-1 50
3♥︎s3♠︎-2 100
3♠︎w6♥︎= 140
2♠︎wT♣︎+1 140
Another closely divided deck, with the contact going to the side that has 21 total points, and spades, the ranking suit. East passes and South opens 1♣︎. West overcalls 1♠︎ and North makes a negative double. East raises to 2♠︎ and South competes to 3♥︎ on the almost-known eight-card fit. West's singleton heart convinces him to compete to 3♠︎, ending the auction. West has two trump losers but might manage nine tricks if a second diamond trick can be established. It's tricky because there are so few entries to dummy and the defenders will probably prevail by leading hearts every time they are in.
#14 N NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ 974Dealer: S
♥︎ K976 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ KT7D  EAST      
♠︎T6532♣︎ T94♠︎KJ8
♥︎T♥︎A832
♦︎AJ84N SOUTH       ♦︎963
♣︎AKJ♠︎AQ♣︎752
6♥︎QJ540
13HCP8♦︎Q524FRK0
13♣︎Q8631
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
54868by
E
69575
by
S
54868by
W
69575
Board 15 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Judy Day
X4N100 4.002NTw+3♣︎3210 0.000X3EFrancesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N75 3.003NTw=♣︎2400 1.0025X1EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X5N38 1.503NTw+1♠︎4430 2.5063X5EMyrna Halpenny &
Vicki Torbett
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X1N38 1.503NTw+1♣︎2430 2.5063X2EDoug MacDougall &
Niamh Kelly
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X2N0 0.003NTw+2♣︎2460 4.00100X4EPam Tomlins &
Tim Tomlins
Section A Scores (three weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3NwT♠︎+1 430
3NwT♠︎+1 430
3Nw9♠︎+2 460
3NwT♠︎+2 460
3Nw4♠︎+2 460
3NwT♠︎+3 490
South opens 1♠︎ and West makes a takeout double. North passes and East must avoid bidding 2♥︎, which would be the bid East would make with a five card heart suit and zero points! Eight points or more is usually enough to make a jump response after partner's takeout double, so East instead bids 3♥︎. West recognizes the extra strength, but doesn't have heart support, and bids 3NT. East needs to be careful: don't assume West has hearts and 'correct' to 4♥︎! Sometimes a takeout double has to be made on a strong off-shape hand. Both 4♥︎ and 3NT make eleven tricks, but 3NT scores ten points better!
#15 V NORTH       Apr. 13, 2026
♠︎ T94Dealer: W
♥︎ J85 EW Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ T32N  EAST      
♠︎AJ3♣︎ T952♠︎72
♥︎K92♥︎QT43
♦︎AK75D SOUTH       ♦︎Q864
♣︎K87♠︎KQ865♣︎AQ6
1♥︎A760
18HCP10♦︎J90FRK1
11♣︎J432
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
24223by
E
119111110
by
S
24223by
W
119111110

Work In Progress! This HTML page with results combines the ACBLscore results, the BridgeMate data, and the actual cards in each hand to make a page that displays nicely on most screens. I'll continue to develop it as I hear about problems from people. So far I have only really had time to test it on the large monitor I have at home. I've done a little bit of work in making it fit on my iPhone 15 screen (turned sideways), but the typical cellphone screen is not wide enough to display the hands alongside the results, so it relocates the hands below the results and you may need to scroll down a bit. The key is in the tabs at the top, which mean you don't need to scroll to get from results to Board 32! Just click or tap on what you want to see next!

Two things that may help: If your browser program is old, some of the tech in this page might not work 100%: the system of tabs at the top of the page requires a recent version. You really aren't doing your computer many favours if you avoid requests to upgrade the programs you use most often, like browsers. If the page works but there are large areas of a monitor unused, you might be able to make it more readable by adjusting the size of things with CTRL + (plus key), which upsizes text and other screen elements a bit. CTRL + (minus key) also works if you go too far, and CTRL + (zero) resets to the default. (This doesn't work on cellphone screens.)

How is a pair's matchpoint score on a board calculated? Your raw score is compared one by one with all of the other raw scores on the board made by pairs sitting in your direction. You get one matchpoint for each score you beat, and a half-point for each score that is the same as yours. The top score on a board is one less than the number of times it is played. If the board was not played as many times as other boards for some reason, the scores may be factored up to compensate, so that each board has the same top score.

How is a pair's total score calculated? The scoring program first checks all boards to see how many times they have been played. Usually this will be the same for all boards, but if there is a sitout or a glitch of some sort in the movement, or an artificially assigned score due to an irregularity, the scoring program must first FACTOR scores on boards played fewer times, so that the top score on every board is the same. Once that is done, the scoring program also checks to see that each pair played the same number of boards: some may have sat out and missed a round: these pairs will have their total matchpoints FACTORED so that they get matchpoints for the boards they missed, based on their percentage on the boards they did play. The total of all this summing and factoring is your final score.

How does this factoring work exactly? There are actually two types of factoring: the most common is to factor a pair's score that has not played as many boards as the other pairs. Their sum of matchpoints on the boards they played, is divided by the number of boards they played, and then multiplied by the number of boards most pairs played. The other type is covered in the next question.

I have the best score on a board but got slightly fewer matchpoints than tops on other boards, why is that? This is the other type of factoring, which happens when a board is played fewer times than other boards for some reason. Maybe a pair didn't get to it, or there was a artificial score assigned after an irregularity. Factoring a board has to take into account the small chance that, had it been played the correct number of times, the extra plays might have produced a score that is better than the current top, or lower than the current bottom. To do so, the ACBL and the World Bridge Federation use the Neuberg formula, which you can read about on Wikipedia if you want the complete details. It has its detractors, but is sort of like Winston Churchill's ranking of democracy as the second-worst system of government ... all the others being tied for first!

HCP and FRK, what on earth are they? HCP stands for highcard points, and the four numbers surrounding it show how many points each player has in a hand. The colour behind the word "HCP" is gray when the 40 points are evenly distributed between North-South and East-West, but turns more and more orange (North-South) or purple (East-West) if one side has a majority. FRK stands for Freakness, a way to describe just how freaky a hand's distribution is, on a scale from 0-20, with average for a hand being just slightly less than 3, and the average for a full deal, the sum of the freakness ratings of the four hands, is about 11.93 on average. A hand gets one freakness point for each card in a suit beyond the fourth, or less than three; plus a bonus if the hand contains at least one void (2 points) or at least one singleton but no void (1 point). The background colour behind the "FRK" shows whether the deal is hot (red), average (gray), or cold (blue) in terms of Freakness! Freakness was created by bridge expert Richard Pavlicek and searching for "pavlicek freakness" will get you quickly to his article on the subject.

Something New! The tabs with the board numbers now indicate which side had the bulk of the high-card points (above the board number: NS: orange, EW: purple, evenly-split: gray), and the freakness rating of the deal as a whole (below the board number: flat: blue, average: gray, freaky: red)! Want to see only the hands where N-S had the points, or the freakiest ones? Check the tabs!

What are "tricks available" and how are they calculated? Computers these days can analyze all the possible legal play lines on a deal, given a trump suit (or notrump) and a declarer, and sort all of these lines into successes and failures to come up with an optimum line of play that perfect defenders and a perfect declarer would take. The result of this line of play is the "tricks available" and is sometimes unrealistic, requiring opening leads that few if any would find, or declarer taking only the finesses that work and dropping offside singleton honours where possible. You will very quickly see from the results which deals have unrealistic "tricks available" expectations, and it is often a fun exercise to work out how you can make that many tricks. But for most deals, it is a fairly good guide as to how high a pair should bid.

Why are the masterpoints not the same as what is on ACBL Live for Clubs? This is in my view an own goal by ACBL: they have new rules for club game masterpoints but are not willing to expend the time to upgrade ACBLscore to show the masterpoints under the new rules. Luckily, most masterpoint awards actually get bigger when they go through the "engine" and are reposted on Live. The main effect is to give more masterpoints to games where the non-sitting out pairs play more boards. The problem is that the masterpoint awards that come out of ACBLscore, before being posted online, are not what you eventually get.

How can I contact McBruce to tell him what's not working for me? By e-mail: ooga@shaw.ca