VanLawn Bridge After Dark, Section X, Monday Evening, February 23, 2026

No overalls in today's game.

Results for Section X, North-South
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X2N 72.62% 61.0010.49John Fraser - Johanne Leach
X4N 57.14% 48.0020.34Vicki Torbett - Cathy Brown
X3N 51.79% 43.5030.25Eiler Eis - Bob Hodgkinson
X1N 50.00% 42.00Kelly Anderson - Mike Bow
X5N 49.40% 41.50Amanda Hill - David Hsu
X7N 35.12% 29.50Gillian Raphael - Howard Raphael
X6N 33.93% 28.50Francesco L Piccone - M Piccone
North-South had 52.71% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 13.46, a bit above the average of about 11.93.
Results for Section X, East-West
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X2E 58.93% 49.5010.49Alan Atkins - Carol Linda Ward
X5E 54.17% 45.5020.34Ron Rogers - Patsy Thorpe
X4E 52.98% 44.5030.25Niamh Kelly - Doug MacDougall
X1E 50.00% 42.00Curtis Ballard - Elizabeth Ballard
X7E 50.00% 42.00Barbara Spitz - Jill Price
X3E 47.62% 40.00Doug Stewart - Louise Forsyth
X6E 36.31% 30.50Gaye Ballantyne - Patti Young
North-South had 52.71% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 13.46, a bit above the average of about 11.93.
Board 1 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N100 6.001101♥︎n+1♦︎K 0.000X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N67 4.00504♠︎w–1♥︎A 2.0033X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N67 4.00504♦︎e–1♥︎7 2.0033X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N67 4.00502♠︎w–1♥︎A 2.0033X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N33 2.002♠︎w=♥︎A110 4.0067X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N17 1.001NTe+1♥︎7120 5.0083X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N0 0.003♦︎e+1♥︎J130 6.00100X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♥︎nA♦︎= 140
4♥︎nA♦︎-2 100
2♦︎eJ♥︎+2 130
3♦︎eJ♥︎+2 150
4♦︎eJ♥︎+2 170
North opens 1♥︎ and East overcalls 2♦︎. Most South players would consider the South hand too weak to bid, but modern players recognize such hands need to be able to pre-empt to 3♥︎ to make it difficult for the opponents. If South can bid 3♥︎ as a non-forcing pre-emptive raise AND trust North to recognize that the hand could be this weak and not bid on with hands like the North hand, that's the way to go, and 3♥︎ goes down one for a good score. If South passes, East-West will find their way to some number of diamonds and make 130 instead of the 50 they get defending 3♥︎. A good Wikipedia article on the value of a good fit is "Law of Total Tricks."
#1 D NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ K843Dealer: N
♥︎ AKQ64 None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ 942N  EAST      
♠︎Q9765♣︎ Q♠︎AT
♥︎32♥︎95
♦︎Q83N SOUTH       ♦︎AK765
♣︎AK3♠︎J2♣︎J974
14♥︎JT874
11HCP12♦︎JT2FRK3
3♣︎T86523
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
44834by
E
885109
by
S
44834by
W
885109
Board 2 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N92 5.5014406NTs=♣︎3 0.508X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N92 5.5014406NTn=♣︎6 0.508X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N58 3.5014306♥︎s=♦︎9 2.5042X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N58 3.5014306♥︎n=♠︎9 2.5042X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N33 2.007203NTs+4♣︎5 4.0067X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N8 0.506903NTs+3♣︎5 5.5092X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N8 0.506903NTs+3♣︎5 5.5092X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
6Nn4♣︎+1 1470
6♥︎n8♦︎= 1430
6♥︎n9♠︎= 1430
4♥︎n7♦︎+2 680
4♠︎sJ♦︎+2 680
East passes and South opens 2NT, and after West passes, North is surprised to have 12 points opposite partner's 20-21. With 4-5 in the majors, North's first move is 3♣︎, to find out if partner has a four-card major; 3♦︎ denies one and North continues with 3♥︎ to show more than four hearts. This gets a raise to 4♥︎ by South and North launches into Blackwood with 4NT. South shows three aces but South's limit of 21 points means the opponents must have at least seven, so a grand slam is out of the question, and South settles for 6♥︎. It makes, but so does 6NT. Maybe 5NT, guaranteeing all four aces, would be a better move, making 6NT easier to bid.
#2 V NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ AQT6Dealer: E
♥︎ K9843 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ K3D  EAST      
♠︎J873♣︎ 92♠︎95
♥︎J2♥︎T75
♦︎J9V SOUTH       ♦︎QT8754
♣︎K8753♠︎K42♣︎64
12♥︎AQ63
6HCP2♦︎A623FRK4
20♣︎AQJT0
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
121212811by
E
11152
by
S
121212811by
W
11152
Board 3 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N92 5.504♥︎s–3♠︎A150 0.508X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N92 5.504♥︎s–3♠︎Q150 0.508X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N67 4.004♠︎w=♥︎7620 2.0033X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N50 3.004♠︎w+1♥︎5650 3.0050X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N25 1.504♠︎w+2♥︎5680 4.5075X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N25 1.505♠︎w+1♥︎7680 4.5075X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N0 0.005♥︎*s–4♣︎A800 6.00100X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♠︎w9♥︎-1 100
3♠︎wK♣︎+2 200
4♠︎eK♥︎+1 650
4♠︎eK♥︎+1 650
5♠︎w5♥︎+1 680
Pre-empts in duplicate work well. They minimize the minus scores you get with bad hands. Here, South opens 3♥︎, West makes a takeout double, and North raises to 4♥︎. It's not so much the pre-empt that makes things difficult for poor East, it is the raise: North can raise with good hands, bad hands with good fits, and middlish hands like this one. East passes and leaves West to gamble a 4♠︎ bid. If South passes, East-West will bid to 4♠︎ easily and may even get to 6♠︎, which makes when North leads a club to declarer's ace and after trumps are pulled, the A♥︎ and another throws South in to lead away from diamonds, or a heart for a ruff and discard!
#3 N NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ 54Dealer: S
♥︎ 75 EW Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ T3V  EAST      
♠︎AKQT3♣︎ KQJT965♠︎98762
♥︎82♥︎A9
♦︎KJ85D SOUTH       ♦︎A96
♣︎A3♠︎J♣︎872
6♥︎KQJT6436
17HCP8♦︎Q7423FRK2
9♣︎48
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
21627by
E
11127116
by
S
21627by
W
11127116
Board 4 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N92 5.501103♣︎s=♠︎6 0.508X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N92 5.501102♣︎s+1♠︎6 0.508X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N67 4.001NTe=♣︎K90 2.0033X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N50 3.002♥︎w=♣︎A110 3.0050X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N25 1.502♦︎s–2♣︎4200 4.5075X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N25 1.503NTs–2♠︎2200 4.5075X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N0 0.003♥︎n–3♠︎A300 6.00100X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♠︎w2♥︎-2 200
1NeK♣︎-1 100
2♥︎wA♣︎-1 100
1NeK♣︎-1 100
1NeK♣︎= 90
West and North pass and East opens 1♣︎. South passes and West responds 1♠︎. North passes and East rebids 1NT. South gets into the auction with a 2♣︎ call which must be natural: if South had a strong hand, South would have bid on the first round. West ends the auction with 2♥︎ and South's bid gets North to lead the A♣︎ and another. West ruffs, but realizes that more club ruffs risk being overruffed on this auction, so changes course and leads a spade, hoping for eventual spade ruffs. North's jack is taken by East's ace and with the spades now nearly set up, best is to abandon ruffs and lead trumps. West should emerge with eight or nine tricks for a good score.
#4 V NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ KJ73Dealer: W
♥︎ J972 All Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ J62V  EAST      
♠︎QT862♣︎ A3♠︎A9
♥︎QT53♥︎K864
♦︎K87V SOUTH       ♦︎AT9
♣︎4♠︎54♣︎J852
10♥︎A1
7HCP12♦︎Q5434FRK1
11♣︎KQT9766
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
85479by
E
58954
by
S
85479by
W
58954
Board 5 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N100 6.006204♠︎n=♣︎7 0.000X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N58 3.501403♠︎n=♣︎7 2.5042X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N58 3.501403♠︎n=♥︎3 2.5042X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N58 3.501403♠︎n=♦︎4 2.5042X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N58 3.501403♠︎n=♥︎3 2.5042X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N17 1.00504♣︎w–1♠︎A 5.0083X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N0 0.004♠︎n–1♣︎4100 6.00100X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♠︎n7♣︎= 140
3♠︎n7♣︎= 140
3♠︎n7♣︎= 140
4♣︎wA♠︎-2 100
3♣︎wA♠︎= 110
Is the North hand an opening bid? If North passes, East does as well and South opens 1♦︎ in third chair. West overcalls 2♣︎ and North bids 2♠︎. South will raise to 3♠︎ and it will be difficult for North to refrain from raising to game, which goes down one on two club and two heart losers. If North opens 1♠︎, East will pass and South will raise: 2NT and 3♠︎ are possible, but 4♠︎ is best, putting maximum pressure on West, who might try 5♣︎ and end up three down! Don't let the vulnerability prevent you from bidding 4♠︎ on this hand: being vulnerable only matters when you are stretching so much for a game that you might end up two down. Here it seems that down two in spades is unlikely.
#5 D NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ AK542Dealer: N
♥︎ J2 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ Q98N  EAST      
♠︎J87♣︎ J96♠︎3
♥︎A9♥︎K6543
♦︎JTV SOUTH       ♦︎75432
♣︎AKQ853♠︎QT96♣︎74
11♥︎QT872
15HCP3♦︎AK64FRK6
11♣︎T21
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
59564by
E
54778
by
S
59564by
W
54778
Board 6 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N100 6.001303♦︎n+1♠︎5 0.000X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N83 5.003♦︎s–1♣︎A50 1.0017X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N67 4.005♦︎n–2♠︎A100 2.0033X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N50 3.003♠︎w+2♦︎A200 3.0050X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N33 2.005♦︎*s–3♣︎A500 4.0067X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N8 0.505♠︎w=♦︎A650 5.5092X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N8 0.504♠︎w+1♦︎A650 5.5092X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♦︎sA♣︎= 110
5♠︎wA♦︎-1 100
5♦︎n7♣︎-3 150
4♠︎wA♦︎+1 650
4♠︎wA♦︎+1 650
East opens 1♣︎, South passes, West responds 1♠︎, and North bids 1NT. This is a good case for asking what the partnership agreements are about 1NT, and East should ask South about 1NT. Having not bid before, North may have a full 1NT opener type of hand with a spade stopper, or it may be some sort of takeout double. JACK's system is that 1NT shows four hearts and five diamonds (with 5-5 JACK overcalls 2NT, with five hearts JACK bids 2♥︎). East's hand actually gets better on this explanation, in support of spades East has 12 points plus extras for the diamond void and the good trumps, plus the K♥︎ seems to be well-placed. 4♠︎ would not be a stretch even opposite a minimum, and 4♠︎ makes!
#6 N NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ JDealer: E
♥︎ AJ42 EW Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ AKJ42D  EAST      
♠︎T97643♣︎ QJ2♠︎AQ52
♥︎Q65♥︎K983
♦︎T5N SOUTH       ♦︎
♣︎A5♠︎K8♣︎KT876
17♥︎T74
6HCP12♦︎Q987634FRK6
5♣︎9434
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
82584by
E
511749
by
S
82584by
W
511749
Board 7 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N92 5.501402♠︎n+1♥︎A 0.508X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N92 5.501402♠︎n+1♦︎T 0.508X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N67 4.00801♥︎n=♠︎J 2.0033X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N33 2.003♠︎n–1♣︎9100 4.0067X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N33 2.004♠︎n–1♥︎J100 4.0067X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N33 2.003♠︎s–1♥︎8100 4.0067X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N0 0.002NTn–3♠︎J300 6.00100X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2Nn6♥︎= 120
2♦︎e8♠︎-1 100
1Nn6♥︎= 90
4♠︎s9♥︎-2 200
3♠︎s9♥︎-2 200
South and West pass and North opens 1NT. East overcalls a natural 2♥︎, and this hand is a good one for the Lebensohl convention, where South has three ways to bid hands with five or more spades: a jump to 3♠︎ is game forcing, an immediate 2♠︎ is the weakest, and a 2NT bid forces North to bid 3♣︎ next so South can continue to 3♠︎ to show an invitational hand. Is this one enough, with the singleton in the opponent's suit, for an invite? I don't think so; North will be forced to ruff several times and may lose trump control; 2♠︎ is enough. More optimistic South's will get into trouble bidding more when spades break 4-1.
#7 V NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ AQ3Dealer: S
♥︎ KT753 All Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ K8V  EAST      
♠︎KT42♣︎ AJ8♠︎J
♥︎98♥︎AQJ62
♦︎AJ52D SOUTH       ♦︎T943
♣︎754♠︎98765♣︎QT9
17♥︎42
8HCP10♦︎Q761FRK4
5♣︎K6324
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
68657by
E
75785
by
S
68657by
W
75786
Board 8 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N75 4.501502♦︎n+3♣︎6 1.5025X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N75 4.501503NTe–3♦︎A 1.5025X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N75 4.501504♦︎s+1♥︎A 1.5025X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N75 4.501504♦︎n+1♥︎Q 1.5025X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N33 2.001304♦︎n=♥︎Q 4.0067X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N17 1.005♦︎n–1♥︎Q50 5.0083X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N0 0.003♠︎e+1♦︎A170 6.00100X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎e*A♦︎-4 800
3Ns8♥︎+1 430
4♦︎sA♥︎+1 150
4♦︎nQ♥︎= 130
4♥︎w7♥︎-2 100
West opens 2♥︎ and North overcalls 3♦︎. East raises to 3♥︎ and South decides to try 3NT. West leads the 8♥︎ and East plays the jack. South can win the K♥︎ and cash six diamonds and two black aces, but even better is to duck. A second heart from East can also be ducked, knowing East cannot have any more (West's opening promised six hearts). East switches to a spade which looks dangerous, but now South can still take the club finesse after cashing all the diamonds for nine tricks. If West instead leads the K♠︎, South ducks twice before winning the ace, and finesses East for the K♣︎, knowing that if it loses, West will not have another spade.
#8 N NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ A82Dealer: W
♥︎ 7 None Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ KQT432N  EAST      
♠︎KQ4♣︎ Q53♠︎J9653
♥︎AT8542♥︎QJ
♦︎95N SOUTH       ♦︎J
♣︎T9♠︎T7♣︎K8764
11♥︎K9635
9HCP8♦︎A8764FRK6
12♣︎AJ21
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
956106by
E
38737
by
S
956106by
W
38737
Board 9 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N92 5.504003NTn=♦︎5 0.508X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N92 5.504003NTn=♥︎9 0.508X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N67 4.001801NTn+3♥︎9 2.0033X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N50 3.001501NTn+2♥︎9 3.0050X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N33 2.001201NTn+1♥︎9 4.0067X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N17 1.001102♣︎n+1♥︎K 5.0083X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N0 0.002♠︎s–1♣︎250 6.00100X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1NnK♥︎+2 150
1Nn9♥︎+2 150
2Ns6♥︎= 120
1Nn9♥︎= 90
3NnT♥︎-3 150
North passes and East opens 1♣︎. South overcalls 1♠︎ and West passes. North bids 1NT, warning South of the lack of a spade fit, but does South have enough to invite game? JACK thinks not, expecting 2NT to have a much greater chance at going down than 1NT. Mostly I think this is because of the lack of a heart stopper in the South hand. North shows stuff in all suits but spades, and may well have hearts stopped, but East is likely to have the missing high cards, which may make East's hearts well-placed over North's. However, you would never get me to lead the T♥︎ or the 9♥︎ against 3NT from this holding. Lead the K♥︎ and avoid giving North the jack as a free trick!
#9 D NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ 6Dealer: N
♥︎ AJ53 EW Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ QT8V  EAST      
♠︎JT93♣︎ QJ987♠︎K82
♥︎642♥︎KQT9
♦︎KJ94N SOUTH       ♦︎753
♣︎52♠︎AQ754♣︎AT4
10♥︎874
5HCP12♦︎A621FRK0
13♣︎K632
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
987710by
E
45653
by
S
887810by
W
45653
Board 10 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N99 5.921003♥︎w–1♠︎6 0.081X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N79 4.753♠︎s–1♥︎A100 1.2521X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N40 2.422♥︎w+1♠︎6140 3.5860X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N40 2.423♥︎w=♠︎6140 3.5860X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N40 2.422♥︎w+1♠︎6140 3.5860X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N1 0.083♠︎*s–2♥︎A500 5.9299X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎wJ♦︎-1 100
4♣︎sK♦︎-1 100
3♥︎w6♠︎= 140
2♥︎eA♠︎+1 140
3♥︎w6♠︎= 140
Nine-card fits are so powerful it can get the auction moving even when the 40 points are evenly split between the two sides. East passes and South opens 1♠︎. West overcalls 2♥︎ and North stretches a bit to make a Negative Double, showing diamonds and clubs. East raises to 3♥︎ on just six points, knowing that the Law of Total Tricks will protect East-West from harm with their nine-card fit. South decides to try 4♣︎, knowing that it is at least an eight-card fit, and this gives West the Last Guess: double 4♣︎? Pass and try to beat it? Or bid on to 4♥︎? With much of the field in 3♥︎ making, West's choice is crucial: this time, double is right. Next time, who knows?
#10 V NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ 6Dealer: E
♥︎ K65 All Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ 7632D  EAST      
♠︎T8♣︎ KQ874♠︎Q9542
♥︎A8742♥︎QJ93
♦︎KQ5V SOUTH       ♦︎J98
♣︎A65♠︎AKJ73♣︎2
8♥︎T4
13HCP6♦︎AT42FRK4
13♣︎JT934
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
87479by
E
46953
by
S
87479by
W
46953
Board 11 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N92 5.504603NTs+2♥︎3 0.508X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N92 5.504603NTs+2♣︎5 0.508X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N58 3.504505♥︎s=♣︎9 2.5042X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N58 3.504504♥︎s+1♠︎J 2.5042X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N33 2.004204♥︎s=♦︎8 4.0067X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N17 1.004005♦︎n=♥︎9 5.0083X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N0 0.004♥︎s–1♠︎J50 6.00100X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ns5♣︎+2 460
4♥︎sJ♠︎+1 450
4♥︎sJ♠︎+1 450
4♥︎sJ♠︎= 420
4♥︎s8♦︎= 420
South opens 1NT, West passes, North makes a Stayman 2♣︎ enquiry, and East overcalls 2♠︎. Do you know what double means in your partnership here? Does 3♥︎ promise a good hand or can it be bid on any hand with four hearts, or does it require five or more? This is the hidden cost of many matchpoints: not the skill difference between good and expert pairs, but the knowledge-of-system gap: experienced pairs know their agreements, and seldom flub questions like this. I think double in this specific auction is the best way to show four hearts, but over a 2♥︎ overcall it might be completely different. (4♥︎ is the best spot for North-South: the pair in 3NT got off to the wrong lead.)
#11 N NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ 3Dealer: S
♥︎ AJ54 None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ QT9642N  EAST      
♠︎JT6♣︎ J8♠︎AQ7542
♥︎Q73♥︎98
♦︎83D SOUTH       ♦︎A5
♣︎Q9652♠︎K98♣︎T43
8♥︎KT626
5HCP10♦︎KJ72FRK4
17♣︎AK70
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
7611117by
E
26226
by
S
7611117by
W
26226
Board 12 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N100 6.00504♥︎e–1♣︎7 0.000X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N83 5.001NTe+3♦︎6180 1.0017X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N67 4.003NTe=♣︎7400 2.0033X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N33 2.004♥︎e=♣︎7420 4.0067X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N33 2.004♥︎e=♣︎9420 4.0067X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N33 2.004♥︎e=♣︎J420 4.0067X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N0 0.003NTe+1♥︎6430 6.00100X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
1♥︎eJ♣︎+3 170
3Ne7♣︎= 400
3NeT♠︎= 400
4♥︎eJ♣︎+1 450
3NeJ♣︎+2 460
North-South pass throughout and East opens 1♥︎ in third seat. West responds 2♣︎, the Reverse Drury query asking if East has a real opener or some third-seat junk. East rebids 3NT to show a good balanced hand with five hearts. This gives West a difficult choice: leave 3NT in, or convert to 4♥︎? The case for leaving 3NT in is that 10 points plus partner's 18 or so (shown by the jump to 3NT) is in the high 20s where notrump usually makes the same number of tricks and is ten points better. The case for 4♥︎ is the two aces and, in some partnerships, the small chance that East's third seat 1♥︎ may be on a four-card suit. JACK, who always has five, chooses 4♥︎, but I think I would prefer 3NT. Close choice!
#12 V NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ Q87Dealer: W
♥︎ AT43 NS Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ KJ8N  EAST      
♠︎A63♣︎ Q96♠︎KJ4
♥︎Q95♥︎KJ872
♦︎542V SOUTH       ♦︎AQ3
♣︎A532♠︎T952♣︎K4
12♥︎60
10HCP17♦︎T9760FRK2
1♣︎JT873
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
23244by
E
1191199
by
S
23244by
W
1191199
Board 13 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N83 5.006804♥︎s+2♣︎A 1.0017X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N83 5.006804♥︎s+2♣︎A 1.0017X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N83 5.006804♥︎s+2♣︎A 1.0017X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N50 3.006603NTs+2♠︎2 3.0050X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N33 2.006504♥︎s+1♣︎7 4.0067X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N17 1.006204♥︎s=♦︎2 5.0083X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N0 0.001703♥︎s+1♣︎J 6.00100X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎s2♦︎+2 680
4♥︎s2♦︎+2 680
4♥︎n2♦︎+2 680
4♥︎s2♠︎+2 680
4♥︎s2♦︎+1 650
Splinter bids are double jumps to a new suit that show a singleton (rarely a void) in that suit and excellent support for partner, guaranteeing enough for game and inviting slam if partner's values are not wasted in the splinter suit. With one loser in the splinter suit and most of the other 30 points working in the other three, slam chances are excellent. But on this hand we have a rare chance to go one better: North opens 1♦︎, and after South's 1♥︎ response, North leaps to ... 4♦︎!! This is called the Impossible Splinter, since North opened 1♦︎. It shows good four-card heart support and a strong six-card diamond suit. South should get to 6♥︎ easily after this rare gem is perfectly used.
#13 D NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ 64Dealer: N
♥︎ KQ72 All Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ AKT743V  EAST      
♠︎J852♣︎ 2♠︎KQT7
♥︎T86♥︎54
♦︎2V SOUTH       ♦︎Q9
♣︎AJT73♠︎A93♣︎Q9864
12♥︎AJ936
6HCP9♦︎J8654FRK3
13♣︎K51
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
8412114by
E
28129
by
S
11412114by
W
28129
Board 14 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Kelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
X1N100 6.002003♠︎n+2♥︎A 0.000X2EAlan Atkins &
Carol Linda Ward
Vicki Torbett &
Cathy Brown
X4N75 4.501304♦︎n=♣︎T 1.5025X1ECurtis Ballard &
Elizabeth Ballard
John Fraser &
Johanne Leach
X2N75 4.501304♦︎n=♣︎T 1.5025X4ENiamh Kelly &
Doug MacDougall
Amanda Hill &
David Hsu
X5N25 1.504♠︎s–1♣︎A50 4.5075X3EDoug Stewart &
Louise Forsyth
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X7N25 1.505♦︎s–1♣︎A50 4.5075X7EBarbara Spitz &
Jill Price
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X6N25 1.505♦︎s–1♣︎A50 4.5075X5ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Eiler Eis &
Bob Hodgkinson
X3N25 1.504♠︎n–1♣︎750 4.5075X6EGaye Ballantyne &
Patti Young
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♣︎w*A♦︎-2 300
4♦︎sA♣︎= 130
4♦︎sA♣︎= 130
5♦︎sJ♥︎-1 50
5♣︎w*A♦︎+1 650
East and South pass and West opens 3♣︎. North has a textbook takeout double, East passes, and South naturally bids 3♦︎. West passes and North is quite aware that partner may have nothing and bidding on is risky. Pass gets 130 but a post-hand argument about how North-South can get to spades, where ten tricks are equally easy. Maybe it should be South bidding 3♠︎: seven points is a good number over a takeout double and the risk of being in spades when diamonds is better is minimal. East may even make things more difficult with a raise to 4♣︎ and even sacrifice in 5♣︎ if North-South get to 4♠︎. The A♦︎ lead followed by the king against 5♣︎ is disastrous; West finesses in hearts and clubs, making the rest!!
#14 N NORTH       Feb. 23, 2026
♠︎ AQJ2Dealer: E
♥︎ K765 None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ AKQ4D  EAST      
♠︎T76♣︎ 9♠︎83
♥︎JT♥︎AQ843
♦︎5N SOUTH       ♦︎983
♣︎AQJ6543♠︎K954♣︎T72
19♥︎923
8HCP6♦︎JT7627FRK2
7♣︎K83
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
3106102by
E
437310
by
S
3106103by
W
437310

Work In Progress! This HTML page with results combines the ACBLscore results, the BridgeMate data, and the actual cards in each hand to make a page that displays nicely on most screens. I'll continue to develop it as I hear about problems from people. So far I have only really had time to test it on the large monitor I have at home. I've done a little bit of work in making it fit on my iPhone 15 screen (turned sideways), but the typical cellphone screen is not wide enough to display the hands alongside the results, so it relocates the hands below the results and you may need to scroll down a bit. The key is in the tabs at the top, which mean you don't need to scroll to get from results to Board 32! Just click or tap on what you want to see next!

Two things that may help: If your browser program is old, some of the tech in this page might not work 100%: the system of tabs at the top of the page requires a recent version. You really aren't doing your computer many favours if you avoid requests to upgrade the programs you use most often, like browsers. If the page works but there are large areas of a monitor unused, you might be able to make it more readable by adjusting the size of things with CTRL + (plus key), which upsizes text and other screen elements a bit. CTRL + (minus key) also works if you go too far, and CTRL + (zero) resets to the default. (This doesn't work on cellphone screens.)

How is a pair's matchpoint score on a board calculated? Your raw score is compared one by one with all of the other raw scores on the board made by pairs sitting in your direction. You get one matchpoint for each score you beat, and a half-point for each score that is the same as yours. The top score on a board is one less than the number of times it is played. If the board was not played as many times as other boards for some reason, the scores may be factored up to compensate, so that each board has the same top score.

How is a pair's total score calculated? The scoring program first checks all boards to see how many times they have been played. Usually this will be the same for all boards, but if there is a sitout or a glitch of some sort in the movement, or an artificially assigned score due to an irregularity, the scoring program must first FACTOR scores on boards played fewer times, so that the top score on every board is the same. Once that is done, the scoring program also checks to see that each pair played the same number of boards: some may have sat out and missed a round: these pairs will have their total matchpoints FACTORED so that they get matchpoints for the boards they missed, based on their percentage on the boards they did play. The total of all this summing and factoring is your final score.

How does this factoring work exactly? There are actually two types of factoring: the most common is to factor a pair's score that has not played as many boards as the other pairs. Their sum of matchpoints on the boards they played, is divided by the number of boards they played, and then multiplied by the number of boards most pairs played. The other type is covered in the next question.

I have the best score on a board but got slightly fewer matchpoints than tops on other boards, why is that? This is the other type of factoring, which happens when a board is played fewer times than other boards for some reason. Maybe a pair didn't get to it, or there was a artificial score assigned after an irregularity. Factoring a board has to take into account the small chance that, had it been played the correct number of times, the extra plays might have produced a score that is better than the current top, or lower than the current bottom. To do so, the ACBL and the World Bridge Federation use the Neuberg formula, which you can read about on Wikipedia if you want the complete details. It has its detractors, but is sort of like Winston Churchill's ranking of democracy as the second-worst system of government ... all the others being tied for first!

HCP and FRK, what on earth are they? HCP stands for highcard points, and the four numbers surrounding it show how many points each player has in a hand. The colour behind the word "HCP" is gray when the 40 points are evenly distributed between North-South and East-West, but turns more and more orange (North-South) or purple (East-West) if one side has a majority. FRK stands for Freakness, a way to describe just how freaky a hand's distribution is, on a scale from 0-20, with average for a hand being just slightly less than 3, and the average for a full deal, the sum of the freakness ratings of the four hands, is about 11.93 on average. A hand gets one freakness point for each card in a suit beyond the fourth, or less than three; plus a bonus if the hand contains at least one void (2 points) or at least one singleton but no void (1 point). The background colour behind the "FRK" shows whether the deal is hot (red), average (gray), or cold (blue) in terms of Freakness! Freakness was created by bridge expert Richard Pavlicek and searching for "pavlicek freakness" will get you quickly to his article on the subject.

What are "tricks available" and how are they calculated? Computers these days can analyze all the possible legal play lines on a deal, given a trump suit (or notrump) and a declarer, and sort all of these lines into successes and failures to come up with an optimum line of play that perfect defenders and a perfect declarer would take. The result of this line of play is the "tricks available" and is sometimes unrealistic, requiring opening leads that few if any would find, or declarer taking only the finesses that work and dropping offside singleton honours where possible. You will very quickly see from the results which deals have unrealistic "tricks available" expectations, and it is often a fun exercise to work out how you can make that many tricks. But for most deals, it is a fairly good guide as to how high a pair should bid.

Why are the masterpoints not the same as what is on ACBL Live for Clubs? This is in my view an own goal by ACBL: they have new rules for club game masterpoints but are not willing to expend the time to upgrade ACBLscore to show the masterpoints under the new rules. Luckily, most masterpoint awards actually get bigger when they go through the "engine" and are reposted on Live. The main effect is to give more masterpoints to games where the non-sitting out pairs play more boards. The problem is that the masterpoint awards that come out of ACBLscore, before being posted online, are not what you eventually get.

How can I contact McBruce to tell him what's not working for me? By e-mail: ooga@shaw.ca