VanLawn Section X, Monday Evening February 2, 2026

No overalls in today's game.

Results for Section X, North-South
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X2N 67.86% 57.0010.48Joan Christensen - Carol Linda Ward
X4N 60.81% 51.0820.34Diane O Connor - Valerie Young
X6N 54.26% 45.5830.24Jill Price - Barbara Spitz
X8N 52.98% 44.50Francesco L Piccone - M Piccone
X5N 46.52% 39.08Alexa Allen - Jacquie Brown
X1N 45.14% 37.92Gillian Raphael - Howard Raphael
X7N 37.70% 31.67Marlee Sheinin - Donna Bridgeman
X3N 34.73% 29.17Cathy Brown - Ruth Castellino
East-West had 50.70% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 11.44, a bit below the average of about 11.93.
Results for Section X, East-West
Pair#PercentScoreRankMPtsPlayers
X2E 68.45% 57.5010.48Bob Hodgkinson - Eiler Eis
X3E 58.24% 48.9220.34Niamh Kelly - Johanne Leach
X8E 57.05% 47.9230.24Marcia Smith - Zdenka Buric
X4E 54.56% 45.83Alan Atkins - David Rosenberg
X1E 44.14% 37.08Vicki Torbett - Myrna Halpenny
X5E 42.06% 35.33Kelly Anderson - Mike Bow
X6E 38.00% 31.92Patti Young - Judy Day
X7E 37.50% 31.50Ron Rogers - Patsy Thorpe
East-West had 50.70% of the highcard points in today's deals.
The average freakness rating of today's deals (measuring the amount of distribution in the dealset as a whole) was 11.44, a bit below the average of about 11.93.
Board 1 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N100 6.004003NTs=♠︎4 0.000X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N83 5.001201NTs+1♠︎J 1.0017X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N58 3.503NTs–1♠︎450 2.5042X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N58 3.504♠︎s–1♠︎450 2.5042X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N33 2.004♠︎s–2♥︎A100 4.0067X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N17 1.004♠︎s–3♥︎4150 5.0083X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N0 0.003NTs–4♠︎4200 6.00100X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♠︎sT♣︎= 140
3Ns4♠︎-1 50
4♠︎s3♥︎-1 50
3NsT♣︎-1 50
3Nn6♣︎-2 100
After two passes, South opens 1♠︎ and West passes. North raises to 2♠︎ and East passes. South continues to 3♠︎, inviting game and North decides that 9 points is on the high end of the original 6-10 range for the single raise, so accepts and bids 4♠︎. With 26 combined points and an eight-card fit, what could go wrong? Plenty! Trumps break 4-1, the missing hearts are offside, and even the Q♦︎ is offside. The good news is that this is just as lethal for those who opened the South hand 1NT and were raised to 3NT, so down one in either contract is going to be repeated at other tables. Combined points are a guess at how many tricks can be made; adverse distribution has an effect sometimes as well!
#1 D NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ K82Dealer: N
♥︎ T85 None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ A942N  EAST      
♠︎JT64♣︎ Q32♠︎9
♥︎A43♥︎QJ92
♦︎Q85N SOUTH       ♦︎T73
♣︎T94♠︎AQ753♣︎A8765
9♥︎K760
7HCP7♦︎KJ60FRK4
17♣︎KJ2
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
89787by
E
44556
by
S
89787by
W
44556
Board 2 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N83 5.006303NTs+1♣︎5 1.0017X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N50 3.002001♠︎s+4♥︎Q 3.0050X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N50 3.002003♠︎s+2♣︎A 3.0050X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N50 3.002001♠︎s+4♥︎T 3.0050X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N8 0.501701♠︎s+3♦︎2 5.5092X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N8 0.501702♠︎s+2♣︎A 5.5092X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N50 3.0050-50 -- 3.0050X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎s2♦︎+1 650
3Nn3♥︎+1 630
3♠︎sA♣︎+3 230
2♠︎sQ♥︎+3 200
3♠︎s9♠︎+1 170
This time, with six spades, there is no question but that South should open 1♠︎. West passes and North responds 1NT. East passes and South has nothing but bad options. 2♠︎ and 3♠︎ are all non-forcing, and 4♠︎ gets the pair to game but North may not have any spades at all. 2NT is non-forcing, and 3NT gets the pair to game but denies six spades and relies on North to provide a club stopper. It's a case of which flawed bid is the least worst, and I think 3NT fits the bill: but, when dummy hits with two spades, declarer must strive to make as many tricks as those in 4♠︎ will. With the K♠︎ onside and one heart loser, declarer must get a trick in clubs to get the total to 11 and a good score.
#2 V NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ T8Dealer: E
♥︎ 987 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ A643D  EAST      
♠︎96♣︎ K842♠︎K32
♥︎QT♥︎J6532
♦︎Q852V SOUTH       ♦︎J97
♣︎AT753♠︎AQJ754♣︎Q9
7♥︎AK41
8HCP7♦︎KT3FRK2
18♣︎J64
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
1111999by
E
21444
by
S
1111999by
W
21444
Board 3 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N100 6.001702♥︎s+2♠︎5 0.000X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N83 5.001403♥︎s=♣︎4 1.0017X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N58 3.501102♥︎s=♠︎5 2.5042X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N58 3.501102♥︎s=♦︎8 2.5042X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N33 2.001002♠︎w–1♥︎3 4.0067X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N17 1.003♥︎s–1♠︎K50 5.0083X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N0 0.003NTn–2♠︎4100 6.00100X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♥︎s5♠︎= 110
3♥︎s5♠︎-1 50
3♥︎sT♣︎-2 100
2♠︎wJ♥︎+1 140
3♠︎wJ♥︎= 140
Again South opens one of a major, hearts this time, and after West passes, North responds 1NT. East doubles for takeout and South is happy to rebid 2♥︎ and promise a six-card suit within a minimum-strength opener. West competes to 2♠︎, North to 3♥︎, and East to 3♠︎. Be careful, South! Bidding 4♥︎ could be costly here, even at favourable vulnerability. Defenders will take a diamond, two spades, and two clubs, and if they start with clubs, they may even get a third-round ruff. 3♠︎ makes for 140 and some will escape for less in 3♥︎ or 4♥︎, but the potential is there for -200 and a cold bottom. South should pass 3♠︎ and let partner make the final decision (and take the blame afterwards!).
#3 N NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ 762Dealer: S
♥︎ J3 EW Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ AJT3V  EAST      
♠︎K985♣︎ K632♠︎AJT4
♥︎T76♥︎54
♦︎Q864D SOUTH       ♦︎K72
♣︎T4♠︎Q3♣︎AQ87
9♥︎AKQ9821
5HCP14♦︎951FRK1
12♣︎J954
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
74756by
E
69586
by
S
74756by
W
69586
Board 4 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N92 5.502003NTe–2♥︎6 0.508X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N92 5.502002♦︎e–2♠︎T 0.508X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N67 4.001102♠︎n=♦︎K 2.0033X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N50 3.001003♦︎e–1♥︎2 3.0050X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N33 2.001NTe=♥︎690 4.0067X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N17 1.002♥︎e=♠︎T110 5.0083X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N0 0.002NTe=♥︎K120 6.00100X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
2♥︎e4♦︎-2 200
2♠︎nA♥︎= 110
2♥︎e7♦︎-1 100
3♥︎eT♠︎-1 100
3♥︎eT♠︎-1 100
West passes and North is a bit light for a weak two: bad suit, lots of losers, so it's two passes to East, who opens 1NT. South passes and West transfers with 2♦︎. North passes and East bids 2♥︎ as ordered. South passes and so does West, and now, armed with the information that West is transfer-dropping with a weak hand, North can come in with a 2♠︎ call. East passes and South passes, hoping that West will bid 3♥︎, but West passes and North should go down. The Section A pair that made 2♠︎ got a favourable opening lead (the A♥︎, setting up South's winners), but the defenders should get two trumps, a heart, two diamonds, and eventually a club for down one. (2♥︎ is also one down.)
#4 V NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ AJ7632Dealer: W
♥︎ T3 All Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ 52V  EAST      
♠︎Q98♣︎ Q73♠︎K54
♥︎98542♥︎A7
♦︎AJ8V SOUTH       ♦︎KQ96
♣︎42♠︎T♣︎KT96
7♥︎KQJ64
7HCP15♦︎T7432FRK1
11♣︎AJ853
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
67667by
E
75776
by
S
67656by
W
75776
Board 5 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N100 6.006504♠︎n+1♦︎A 0.000X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N83 5.002003♠︎n+2♦︎A 1.0017X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N67 4.001702♥︎s+2♠︎6 2.0033X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N50 3.00504♣︎e–1♠︎2 3.0050X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N33 2.004♠︎n–1♦︎A100 4.0067X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N17 1.003♣︎e=♥︎4110 5.0083X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N0 0.005♠︎n–3♥︎6300 6.00100X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♠︎n4♥︎= 650
2♠︎n7♥︎+3 200
2♠︎n5♣︎+2 170
4♣︎e3♠︎-1 50
5♠︎n5♣︎-1 100
North opens 1♠︎ and if East passes it is up to South to evaluate well: nine points, a known eight-card fit, a doubleton, and a trump honour, bump the hand up into limit raise territory, but with only three trumps South should find a temporizing bid before raising: 2♥︎ fits the bill. North continues with 3♦︎ (even if West overcalls 3♣︎) and now South can bid 3♠︎ to show limit-raise values with only three trumps. In a modern system, such hands are treated with a forcing 1NT call followed by a jump to 3♠︎. If East does overcall 2♣︎, the North-South game on 21 combined points (and lots of shape) will be outbid by a club sacrifice which nets North-South only 300.
#5 D NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ AT854Dealer: N
♥︎ KQJ NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ QT982N  EAST      
♠︎Q6♣︎ ♠︎K73
♥︎953♥︎76
♦︎765V SOUTH       ♦︎A4
♣︎AQJ98♠︎J92♣︎KT7652
12♥︎AT8427
9HCP10♦︎KJ32FRK4
9♣︎432
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
61110104by
E
72229
by
S
61110104by
W
72229
Board 6 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N100 6.008004♥︎*w–3♠︎4 0.000X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N83 5.001703♠︎s+1♦︎K 1.0017X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N67 4.001403♠︎s=♣︎2 2.0033X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N50 3.001003♥︎w–1♠︎4 3.0050X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N25 1.503♠︎s–1♥︎K50 4.5075X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N25 1.503♠︎n–1♥︎J50 4.5075X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N0 0.003NTn–2♣︎4100 6.00100X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♥︎w*6♦︎-2 500
4♥︎w*4♠︎-2 500
3♥︎w6♦︎-1 100
4♠︎sK♥︎-1 50
3♦︎sK♥︎-2 100
East passes and South opens 1♦︎. West overcalls 2♥︎ and North makes a negative double, showing four spades. It might seem that this is a dangerous call: what if South doesn't have four spades? If South bids 2♣︎ or 2♦︎, North can give 2NT a try next, so it should work out, and here it works magically, finding the 4-4 spade fit. East passes and South jumps to 3♠︎, confirming the fit and promising extras, which in this case is the crucial heart void. North raises to game and it almost makes on a cross-ruff, but not quite. Aces opposite voids often are liabilities: the four points would be better in another suit since you can ruff anyhow.
#6 N NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ Q654Dealer: E
♥︎ AT942 EW Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ 62D  EAST      
♠︎T2♣︎ KT♠︎973
♥︎KQ87653♥︎J
♦︎KN SOUTH       ♦︎AT93
♣︎AQ2♠︎AKJ8♣︎98543
9♥︎3
14HCP5♦︎QJ87547FRK4
12♣︎J767
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
79695by
E
53747
by
S
79695by
W
53747
Board 7 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N100 6.001201NTs+1♦︎2 0.000X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N75 4.501103♣︎s=♥︎3 1.5025X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N75 4.501102♣︎s+1♦︎6 1.5025X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N50 3.001003♦︎e–1♣︎6 3.0050X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N17 1.003♣︎s–1♦︎2100 5.0083X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N17 1.002♣︎s–1♠︎5100 5.0083X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N17 1.003♣︎s–1♦︎2100 5.0083X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♦︎eA♥︎-1 100
1Ns2♦︎-1 100
3♣︎s2♦︎-1 100
2♥︎s2♦︎-1 100
2♦︎eK♣︎+1 110
1♣︎ or 1NT for South as dealer? Either might work on a good day, or vice versa. On this layout 1NT is a loser: everyone passes, West leads a diamond, and five diamonds later South is reduced to six clubs and two aces. East continues with a heart, and when South wins and leads a club, West wins and cashes the K♥︎ for one down. If South opens 1♣︎, West and North pass and East reopens with a takeout double. South's 2♣︎ would be countered by 2♦︎, but passing might get a 1NT call from West, which South can beat on a club lead. There's no right answer on what South should open, and the result of this one hand is not reliable evidence in answering the question!
#7 V NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ QJ8Dealer: S
♥︎ J9864 All Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ J8V  EAST      
♠︎T65♣︎ T52♠︎K972
♥︎K53♥︎T72
♦︎Q632D SOUTH       ♦︎AK975
♣︎A98♠︎A43♣︎J
5♥︎AQ2
9HCP11♦︎T40FRK4
15♣︎KQ76434
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
65748by
E
68594
by
S
65748by
W
68594
Board 8 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N92 5.504003NTs=♥︎7 0.508X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N92 5.504003NTs=♥︎7 0.508X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N50 3.001502NTs+1♣︎5 3.0050X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N50 3.001501NTs+2♥︎7 3.0050X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N50 3.001502NTs+1♥︎7 3.0050X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N8 0.503NTs–1♠︎250 5.5092X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N8 0.503NTs–1♥︎750 5.5092X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Ns5♣︎= 400
3Ns7♥︎= 400
3Ns5♣︎-1 50
3Ns2♦︎-1 50
3Ns7♦︎-2 100
South opens 2NT after three passes, North bids a Stayman 3♣︎, South responds 3♥︎, but that's not the major North has, so they play in 3NT. With 26 combined, 3NT makes far more often with 13 in each hand than with 21 opposite 5, and this is a prime example. With only one entry to dummy, there is no way to establish the diamonds even when they split 3-3. West's lead might help; a club lead to the ten and South's jack might let South lead the Q♣︎ next: if West wins the king, the 9♣︎ is an extra entry and the diamonds can be played for four winners! If West ducks, South has four clubs, two diamonds, two hearts and a spade. (Maybe don't lead low from the unsupported king against notrump!)
#8 N NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ J876Dealer: W
♥︎ 6 None Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ A9854N  EAST      
♠︎Q92♣︎ 963♠︎KT4
♥︎J987♥︎Q532
♦︎J72N SOUTH       ♦︎QT6
♣︎K85♠︎A53♣︎T72
5♥︎AKT44
7HCP7♦︎K30FRK0
21♣︎AQJ41
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
8108910by
E
53543
by
S
8108910by
W
43543
Board 9 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N100 6.004603NTn+2♠︎2 0.000X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N83 5.004303NTn+1♦︎4 1.0017X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N67 4.002003♦︎w–2♣︎2 2.0033X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N42 2.501502NTs+1♦︎T 3.5058X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N42 2.501504♣︎n+1♠︎A 3.5058X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N17 1.006♣︎*n–1♠︎A100 5.0083X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N0 0.002NTn–3♦︎4150 6.00100X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
5♣︎s*9♠︎= 550
3Ns3♦︎+2 460
3♣︎sT♦︎+2 150
3♣︎sT♠︎+1 130
3Nn2♠︎-2 100
North opens 1NT, East doubles showing an equal or better hand, and South bids ... 5♣︎!! West gets off to the best lead of the T♠︎ and North covers, East winning the ace and returning a small spade to the eight and North's queen. North leads the A♥︎, dropping the J♥︎ from hand, West playing the four, and then a low heart from dummy. East's heart begins to thump: if East ducks and South has the T♥︎, that may be the difference between 10 and 11 tricks. Better would be for West to have signalled with the 9♥︎ on the first round. East ducks and South ruffs, and eventually should lose a second spade and the A♦︎ for down one. 3NT would have been easier...
#9 D NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ KQ7Dealer: N
♥︎ AQ765 EW Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ Q72V  EAST      
♠︎T98♣︎ Q2♠︎AJ32
♥︎T94♥︎K832
♦︎T953N SOUTH       ♦︎AJ64
♣︎986♠︎654♣︎K
15♥︎J2
0HCP16♦︎K80FRK3
9♣︎AJT75437
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
1078610by
E
36573
by
S
1067610by
W
26572
Board 10 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N100 6.001003NTe–1♦︎4 0.000X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N67 4.004♣︎e=♦︎A130 2.0033X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N67 4.003♣︎e+1♦︎4130 2.0033X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N67 4.003♣︎e+1♠︎T130 2.0033X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N33 2.002♥︎s–2♣︎5200 4.0067X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N17 1.001NTe+4♥︎6210 5.0083X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N0 0.003NTe+1♥︎3630 6.00100X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3♦︎nA♠︎= 110
3♣︎eT♠︎= 110
3♣︎eT♠︎= 110
3Ne6♥︎+2 660
3Ne6♥︎+2 660
East opens 1NT as dealer and after South passes, West responds 3♣︎. What's this mean? It is a special sort of invite to 3NT. West has a long club suit which will run if East has Ax or three to an honour, but no outside entry. East, with Qxx♣︎ and stoppers in the other suits, has no trouble bidding 3NT. With two or three small clubs it would be an easy pass. With Qxx♣︎ and stoppers in two of the three other suits, it would be a gamble which might fail if the opening lead is that suit. As you can see, here it is vital that East has a third club because smart defenders will duck the ace on the first round. The jump also works with 1NT-3♦︎, jumps to 3♥︎ or 3♠︎ are usually played differently.
#10 V NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ J9543Dealer: E
♥︎ J5 All Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ QT85D  EAST      
♠︎Q7♣︎ A7♠︎AK62
♥︎74♥︎KQT2
♦︎972V SOUTH       ♦︎K6
♣︎KJT542♠︎T8♣︎Q86
8♥︎A98633
6HCP17♦︎AJ434FRK1
9♣︎933
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
67784by
E
76649
by
S
67784by
W
76549
Board 11 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N100 6.001501NTn+2♣︎8 0.000X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N83 5.001402♥︎n+1♣︎J 1.0017X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N67 4.001201NTn+1♣︎8 2.0033X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N50 3.001002♦︎e–2♣︎9 3.0050X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N33 2.00502♠︎w–1♥︎K 4.0067X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N8 0.504♥︎n–2♣︎8100 5.5092X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N8 0.503♥︎n–2♠︎5100 5.5092X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
3Nn8♣︎+1 430
2♥︎s2♠︎= 110
2♥︎n8♣︎= 110
3♥︎s6♠︎-1 50
3♥︎n2♦︎-2 100
After two passes, North opens 1NT. East passes and South bids a Stayman 2♣︎. West passes and North responds 2♦︎, denying a four-card major. East passes and South bids 2♥︎. What might this one mean, Stayman, 2♦︎ - no major, 2♥︎? What if South had instead bid 2♠︎? Both show length in both majors with the suit bid being at least five cards, and both can be quite weak. 2♥︎ allows the 1NT opener to choose hearts or spades, so to bid 2♠︎ responder should have a strong preference for spades. Here North has no trouble passing 2♥︎, which makes easily. (3NT making 4 happened because of a horribly bad blind fourth-best lead, the 8♣︎ from KJT8. When they get too high, don't help them!)
#11 N NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ 97Dealer: S
♥︎ KQJ None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ KJ76N  EAST      
♠︎QJ862♣︎ AQ32♠︎K5
♥︎92♥︎A53
♦︎A53D SOUTH       ♦︎Q842
♣︎764♠︎AT43♣︎KJT8
16♥︎T87641
7HCP13♦︎T92FRK1
4♣︎953
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
65865by
E
78577
by
S
55865by
W
78577
Board 12 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N92 5.501102♠︎s=♥︎2 0.508X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N92 5.501102♠︎s=♣︎7 0.508X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N67 4.00503♥︎w–1♠︎4 2.0033X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N50 3.003♣︎e+1♠︎5130 3.0050X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N33 2.002♣︎e+3♥︎4150 4.0067X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N8 0.503♥︎w+2♠︎Q200 5.5092X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N8 0.503♠︎s–2♣︎4200 5.5092X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♣︎eK♦︎= 130
3♣︎eJ♣︎+1 130
3♣︎eA♠︎+2 150
3♠︎s7♣︎-3 300
4♣︎e*J♣︎+1 610
West and North pass and East opens 1♣︎. South overcalls 1♠︎ and West makes a negative double, promising four hearts. North passes and East rebids 3♣︎, denying a heart fit and showing a hand with more than a minimum and a strong club suit of six or more. (14 and a singleton is pushing it a bit, but I think I prefer 3♣︎ to 2♣︎ here.) South passes and West chooses 3NT, expecting that even if East has nothing in diamonds, the remaining suits will have enough for nine tricks and the defenders will not be able to cash more than four. North leads a spade and West has a spade stopper, two red aces, and six clubs. Easy game; what were the Section A players doing in clubs?
#12 V NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ QT94Dealer: W
♥︎ J86 NS Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ 853N  EAST      
♠︎K86♣︎ T86♠︎2
♥︎AQ32♥︎975
♦︎T764V SOUTH       ♦︎AJ9
♣︎74♠︎AJ753♣︎AKQ952
3♥︎KT40
9HCP14♦︎KQ21FRK5
14♣︎J32
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
37232by
E
106101011
by
S
37232by
W
106101010
Board 13 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N100 6.008005♣︎*w–3♦︎5 0.000X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N83 5.001303♦︎s+1♥︎A 1.0017X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N58 3.501103♦︎s=♣︎2 2.5042X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N58 3.501103♦︎s=♥︎3 2.5042X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N33 2.001003♣︎w–1♦︎5 4.0067X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N17 1.004♣︎e=♦︎A130 5.0083X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N0 0.003♥︎e=♦︎A140 6.00100X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎n4♥︎= 620
3♦︎s2♣︎+1 130
3♥︎eA♦︎-1 100
3♥︎eA♦︎-1 100
3♥︎eA♦︎= 140
North and East pass and South opens 3♦︎. West doubles and after North passes, East has to choose between 4♣︎ (longest suit) and 3♥︎ (preferring a major). Either one should be passed by West and both are likely to fail after South starts with the AK♦︎ and a third one for North to ruff. In 4♣︎ North will get a trump trick as well. In 3♥︎ East will ruff high and try A♠︎ and a spade ruff, then K♥︎, A♥︎, and a second spade ruff, but now a club lead is won by North, who leads a spade that West must ruff with the last trump, and if North gets in again with a second club, a spade trick sets it. South might instead open 1♦︎, and West will overcall 1NT, but a 2♠︎ bid by North or South will force E-W to 3♥︎.
#13 D NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ QT642Dealer: N
♥︎ J87 All Vul
V WEST      ♦︎ 5V  EAST      
♠︎AJ7♣︎ AJ83♠︎8
♥︎AQ32♥︎K964
♦︎J4V SOUTH       ♦︎Q93
♣︎K962♠︎K953♣︎QT754
8♥︎T54
15HCP7♦︎AKT87621FRK4
10♣︎9
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
410383by
E
62949
by
S
410383by
W
62839
Board 14 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N100 6.004204♠︎n=♥︎J 0.000X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N75 4.501702♠︎s+2♥︎5 1.5025X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N75 4.501703♠︎n+1♥︎4 1.5025X1EVicki Torbett &
Myrna Halpenny
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N50 3.001502♥︎e–3♣︎9 3.0050X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N33 2.001202NTn=♥︎J 4.0067X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N17 1.001002♥︎e–2♣︎9 5.0083X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Gillian Raphael &
Howard Raphael
X1N0 0.004♠︎s–1♥︎550 6.00100X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♠︎s5♥︎= 420
4♠︎s5♥︎= 420
4♠︎nQ♣︎-1 50
4♠︎s5♥︎-1 50
4♠︎s5♥︎-2 100
East opens a weak 2♥︎, which is passed around to North, who makes a takeout double. East passes and N-S have the useful Lebensohl convention in their weapons bag, which allows South three ways to show hands with spades of different strengths. 2♠︎ is the weakest, and 3♠︎ is the game-forcing bid, but in the middle is the multi-faceted Lebensohl 2NT call, which asks North to bid 3♣︎ for now (in this variant North can instead bid 3♦︎ to avoid being possibly dropped in 3♣︎). After the relay, South bids 3♠︎, showing a hand of 9-11 points with a spade suit. North happily raises to game, and if West doubles, North might even consider a redouble, for eleven tricks are available!
#14 N NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ J864Dealer: E
♥︎ T6 None Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ AKQD  EAST      
♠︎AK92♣︎ AK75♠︎T
♥︎5♥︎KJ9432
♦︎6542N SOUTH       ♦︎73
♣︎T843♠︎Q753♣︎QJ62
17♥︎AQ871
7HCP7♦︎JT983FRK6
9♣︎93
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
911797by
E
32535
by
S
911797by
W
32535
Board 15 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N92 5.503♥︎e+1♣︎5170 0.508X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N92 5.503♥︎e+1♠︎4170 0.508X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N58 3.503♥︎e+2♠︎4200 2.5042X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N58 3.502♥︎e+3♦︎5200 2.5042X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N25 1.504♥︎e+1♠︎J450 4.5075X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N25 1.504♥︎e+1♠︎J450 4.5075X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N0 0.004♥︎e+2♠︎J480 6.00100X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎eJ♣︎-1 50
5♥︎eA♠︎-1 50
1Nw6♠︎+1 120
3♥︎eJ♣︎+1 170
4♥︎eJ♣︎+1 450
South opens 1♦︎ and West and North pass. (No, North is not obligated to bid over a short minor.) East is too strong for a simple 1♥︎ overcall, and 2♥︎ would be a weak pre-empt, so East begins with a double and South passes. West bids 2♣︎, North passes, and now East, who made the takeout double, bids 2♥︎. Asking for partner's best suit with a takeout double and then rejecting his choice for your own suit shows a very strong overcall in your suit. West has no trouble raising to 4♥︎ and watching East make it. JACK tried a coup here as East: double, then bid 3NT!! Would you be up to leading the ace of spades after this auction? Nothing else beats it!
#15 V NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ 98763Dealer: S
♥︎ 653 NS Vul
N WEST      ♦︎ Q2N  EAST      
♠︎T52♣︎ 982♠︎K
♥︎JT4♥︎AKQ97
♦︎876D SOUTH       ♦︎AJ4
♣︎AKQ6♠︎AQJ4♣︎T743
2♥︎822
10HCP17♦︎KT9530FRK4
11♣︎J53
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
37361by
E
8510612
by
S
37361by
W
8510611
Board 16 Results
North-South Pair#NS
%
NS
MP
NS
Score
Contract
& Result
Op.
Ld.
EW
Score
EW
MP
EW
%
Pair# East-West
Diane O Connor &
Valerie Young
X4N100 6.003003NTe–3♦︎8 0.000X7ERon Rogers &
Patsy Thorpe
Francesco L Piccone &
M Piccone
X8N83 5.002004♥︎w–2♦︎3 1.0017X8EMarcia Smith &
Zdenka Buric
Cathy Brown &
Ruth Castellino
X3N58 3.501003♥︎e–1♦︎3 2.5042X5EKelly Anderson &
Mike Bow
Joan Christensen &
Carol Linda Ward
X2N58 3.501004♥︎w–1♦︎3 2.5042X3ENiamh Kelly &
Johanne Leach
Marlee Sheinin &
Donna Bridgeman
X7N33 2.003♥︎w+1♦︎3170 4.0067X6EPatti Young &
Judy Day
Alexa Allen &
Jacquie Brown
X5N17 1.004♥︎w=♦︎3620 5.0083X2EBob Hodgkinson &
Eiler Eis
Jill Price &
Barbara Spitz
X6N0 0.003NTe+2♦︎8660 6.00100X4EAlan Atkins &
David Rosenberg
Section A Scores (two weeks ago)
ContractLeadResultN-S ScoreE-W Score
4♥︎w3♦︎-3 300
3NeT♦︎-2 200
4♥︎w3♦︎-1 100
4♥︎wQ♠︎-1 100
3NeT♦︎+1 630
Transfers at the two level over 1NT are overloaded: the transfering player may have a five-card suit, a longer major, even two strong suits. To remove the load a bit, Texas Transfers are more direct routes to game: 4♦︎ or 4♥︎ over 1NT, showing a six-card suit and some values, but not nearly enough for a slam. East opens 1NT after two passes, and after South passes, West jumps to 4♦︎. East bids 4♥︎ and it actually does play a trick better from the East hand, because a club lead from North is lethal! South will try a diamond and East must be careful to play A♥︎ and another heart to avoid allowing North in with a diamond ruff, for the killing club lead will follow.
#16 N NORTH       Feb. 2, 2026
♠︎ QJT84Dealer: W
♥︎ 86 EW Vul
D WEST      ♦︎ 3V  EAST      
♠︎A53♣︎ QJ942♠︎K962
♥︎QT9753♥︎A4
♦︎K4N SOUTH       ♦︎AJ72
♣︎85♠︎7♣︎K63
6♥︎KJ26
9HCP15♦︎QT98654FRK1
10♣︎AT75
Tricks Available (best play by both sides)
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
in
NT
in
♠︎
in
♥︎
in
♦︎
in
♣︎
by
N
36358by
E
971085
by
S
36358by
W
97975

Work In Progress! This HTML page with results combines the ACBLscore results, the BridgeMate data, and the actual cards in each hand to make a page that displays nicely on most screens. I'll continue to develop it as I hear about problems from people. So far I have only really had time to test it on the large monitor I have at home. I've done a little bit of work in making it fit on my iPhone 15 screen (turned sideways), but the typical cellphone screen is not wide enough to display the hands alongside the results, so it relocates the hands below the results and you may need to scroll down a bit. The key is in the tabs at the top, which mean you don't need to scroll to get from results to Board 32! Just click or tap on what you want to see next!

Two things that may help: If your browser program is old, some of the tech in this page might not work 100%: the system of tabs at the top of the page requires a recent version. You really aren't doing your computer many favours if you avoid requests to upgrade the programs you use most often, like browsers. If the page works but there are large areas of a monitor unused, you might be able to make it more readable by adjusting the size of things with CTRL + (plus key), which upsizes text and other screen elements a bit. CTRL + (minus key) also works if you go too far, and CTRL + (zero) resets to the default. (This doesn't work on cellphone screens.)

How is a pair's matchpoint score on a board calculated? Your raw score is compared one by one with all of the other raw scores on the board made by pairs sitting in your direction. You get one matchpoint for each score you beat, and a half-point for each score that is the same as yours. The top score on a board is one less than the number of times it is played. If the board was not played as many times as other boards for some reason, the scores may be factored up to compensate, so that each board has the same top score.

How is a pair's total score calculated? The scoring program first checks all boards to see how many times they have been played. Usually this will be the same for all boards, but if there is a sitout or a glitch of some sort in the movement, or an artificially assigned score due to an irregularity, the scoring program must first FACTOR scores on boards played fewer times, so that the top score on every board is the same. Once that is done, the scoring program also checks to see that each pair played the same number of boards: some may have sat out and missed a round: these pairs will have their total matchpoints FACTORED so that they get matchpoints for the boards they missed, based on their percentage on the boards they did play. The total of all this summing and factoring is your final score.

How does this factoring work exactly? There are actually two types of factoring: the most common is to factor a pair's score that has not played as many boards as the other pairs. Their sum of matchpoints on the boards they played, is divided by the number of boards they played, and then multiplied by the number of boards most pairs played. The other type is covered in the next question.

I have the best score on a board but got slightly fewer matchpoints than tops on other boards, why is that? This is the other type of factoring, which happens when a board is played fewer times than other boards for some reason. Maybe a pair didn't get to it, or there was a artificial score assigned after an irregularity. Factoring a board has to take into account the small chance that, had it been played the correct number of times, the extra plays might have produced a score that is better than the current top, or lower than the current bottom. To do so, the ACBL and the World Bridge Federation use the Neuberg formula, which you can read about on Wikipedia if you want the complete details. It has its detractors, but is sort of like Winston Churchill's ranking of democracy as the second-worst system of government ... all the others being tied for first!

HCP and FRK, what on earth are they? HCP stands for highcard points, and the four numbers surrounding it show how many points each player has in a hand. The colour behind the word "HCP" is gray when the 40 points are evenly distributed between North-South and East-West, but turns more and more orange (North-South) or purple (East-West) if one side has a majority. FRK stands for Freakness, a way to describe just how freaky a hand's distribution is, on a scale from 0-20, with average for a hand being just slightly less than 3, and the average for a full deal, the sum of the freakness ratings of the four hands, is about 11.93 on average. A hand gets one freakness point for each card in a suit beyond the fourth, or less than three; plus a bonus if the hand contains at least one void (2 points) or at least one singleton but no void (1 point). The background colour behind the "FRK" shows whether the deal is hot (red), average (gray), or cold (blue) in terms of Freakness! Freakness was created by bridge expert Richard Pavlicek and searching for "pavlicek freakness" will get you quickly to his article on the subject.

What are "tricks available" and how are they calculated? Computers these days can analyze all the possible legal play lines on a deal, given a trump suit (or notrump) and a declarer, and sort all of these lines into successes and failures to come up with an optimum line of play that perfect defenders and a perfect declarer would take. The result of this line of play is the "tricks available" and is sometimes unrealistic, requiring opening leads that few if any would find, or declarer taking only the finesses that work and dropping offside singleton honours where possible. You will very quickly see from the results which deals have unrealistic "tricks available" expectations, and it is often a fun exercise to work out how you can make that many tricks. But for most deals, it is a fairly good guide as to how high a pair should bid.

Why are the masterpoints not the same as what is on ACBL Live for Clubs? This is in my view an own goal by ACBL: they have new rules for club game masterpoints but are not willing to expend the time to upgrade ACBLscore to show the masterpoints under the new rules. Luckily, most masterpoint awards actually get bigger when they go through the "engine" and are reposted on Live. The main effect is to give more masterpoints to games where the non-sitting out pairs play more boards. The problem is that the masterpoint awards that come out of ACBLscore, before being posted online, are not what you eventually get.

How can I contact McBruce to tell him what's not working for me? By e-mail: ooga@shaw.ca